{"title":"Phase 5 (Naqada IIIb–IIIc1) in Tell El-Farkha. The Peak of Development or the Beginning of Decline?","authors":"K. Ciałowicz","doi":"10.12797/saac.26.2022.26.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research at Tell el-Farkha provides new opportunities to reconstruct the processes of Egyptian state formation. Seven main chronological phases are distinguished. One of the most important periods in the city’s history is phase 4 (Naqada IIIA–Naqada IIIB; ca. 3350–3200 BC). An administrative-cultic centre, a monumental warehouse, and the oldest Egyptian mastaba were created during this time. The inhabitants of Tell el- Farkha owed their prosperity to the trade with the Southern Levant. During phase 5 (Naqada IIIB to Naqada IIIC1; ca. 3200–3000 BC) several phenomena are evident that portended the gradual decline of the city, eventually leading to its abandonment. No evidence of major storage facilities has so far been discovered at Tell el-Farkha from phase 5, and imported pottery is also absent in this period. It seems that at the beginning of the Protodynastic period the Egyptians gradually abandoned the trade routes running through the eastern Delta and used new ones leading via Wadi Tumilat or across the Red Sea. The engravings in Wadi Ameyra (Sinai) with the names of Iry-Hor, Ka, and Narmer suggest that exploration of the natural resources of the Sinai and the maritime routes to Egypt were highly important. In this situation only a few imported products would have reached cities like Tell el-Farkha, which may explain the lack of both central warehouses and imported ceramics. Natural disasters also contributed significantly to the decline of Tell el-Farkha. The abandonment of the Western Kom, at the end of phase 5, clearly followed a major catastrophe caused by natural forces. The collapsed walls may be the result of this cataclysm. Evidence of a natural catastrophe that struck the settlement at the turn of our phases 5 and 6 can be found at the Eastern Kom as well.","PeriodicalId":36852,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/saac.26.2022.26.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The research at Tell el-Farkha provides new opportunities to reconstruct the processes of Egyptian state formation. Seven main chronological phases are distinguished. One of the most important periods in the city’s history is phase 4 (Naqada IIIA–Naqada IIIB; ca. 3350–3200 BC). An administrative-cultic centre, a monumental warehouse, and the oldest Egyptian mastaba were created during this time. The inhabitants of Tell el- Farkha owed their prosperity to the trade with the Southern Levant. During phase 5 (Naqada IIIB to Naqada IIIC1; ca. 3200–3000 BC) several phenomena are evident that portended the gradual decline of the city, eventually leading to its abandonment. No evidence of major storage facilities has so far been discovered at Tell el-Farkha from phase 5, and imported pottery is also absent in this period. It seems that at the beginning of the Protodynastic period the Egyptians gradually abandoned the trade routes running through the eastern Delta and used new ones leading via Wadi Tumilat or across the Red Sea. The engravings in Wadi Ameyra (Sinai) with the names of Iry-Hor, Ka, and Narmer suggest that exploration of the natural resources of the Sinai and the maritime routes to Egypt were highly important. In this situation only a few imported products would have reached cities like Tell el-Farkha, which may explain the lack of both central warehouses and imported ceramics. Natural disasters also contributed significantly to the decline of Tell el-Farkha. The abandonment of the Western Kom, at the end of phase 5, clearly followed a major catastrophe caused by natural forces. The collapsed walls may be the result of this cataclysm. Evidence of a natural catastrophe that struck the settlement at the turn of our phases 5 and 6 can be found at the Eastern Kom as well.
Tell El Farkha的第5阶段(Naqada IIIb–IIIc1)。发展的顶峰还是衰落的开端?
Tell el Farkha的研究为重建埃及国家形成过程提供了新的机会。区分了七个主要的时间阶段。该市历史上最重要的时期之一是第四阶段(Naqada IIIA–Naqada III B;约公元前3350–3200年)。一个行政邪教中心、一个纪念性仓库和最古老的埃及马斯塔巴都是在这段时间创建的。Tell el-Farkha的居民将他们的繁荣归功于与南黎凡特的贸易。在第五阶段(Naqada IIIB至Naqada III C1;约公元前3200年至3000年),有几个明显的现象预示着城市的逐渐衰落,最终导致其废弃。到目前为止,在Tell el Farkha还没有发现第五阶段主要储存设施的证据,这一时期也没有进口陶器。似乎在原始王朝时期开始时,埃及人逐渐放弃了穿过东部三角洲的贸易路线,转而使用经由瓦迪·图米拉特或穿越红海的新路线。Wadi Ameyra(西奈)刻有Iry Hor、Ka和Narmer的名字,这表明对西奈自然资源和通往埃及的海上路线的勘探非常重要。在这种情况下,只有少数进口产品会到达Tell el Farkha这样的城市,这可能解释了缺乏中央仓库和进口陶瓷的原因。自然灾害也对Tell el Farkha的衰落起到了重要作用。在第五阶段结束时,西科姆河被遗弃,显然是在自然力造成重大灾难之后。倒塌的墙壁可能是这场灾难的结果。在我们的第5阶段和第6阶段之交,可以在东科姆找到自然灾害袭击定居点的证据。