Phase 5 (Naqada IIIb–IIIc1) in Tell El-Farkha. The Peak of Development or the Beginning of Decline?

Q2 Arts and Humanities Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization Pub Date : 2022-12-18 DOI:10.12797/saac.26.2022.26.01
K. Ciałowicz
{"title":"Phase 5 (Naqada IIIb–IIIc1) in Tell El-Farkha. The Peak of Development or the Beginning of Decline?","authors":"K. Ciałowicz","doi":"10.12797/saac.26.2022.26.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research at Tell el-Farkha provides new opportunities to reconstruct the processes of Egyptian state formation. Seven main chronological phases are distinguished. One of the most important periods in the city’s history is phase 4 (Naqada IIIA–Naqada IIIB; ca. 3350–3200 BC). An administrative-cultic centre, a monumental warehouse, and the oldest Egyptian mastaba were created during this time. The inhabitants of Tell el- Farkha owed their prosperity to the trade with the Southern Levant. During phase 5 (Naqada IIIB to Naqada IIIC1; ca. 3200–3000 BC) several phenomena are evident that portended the gradual decline of the city, eventually leading to its abandonment. No evidence of major storage facilities has so far been discovered at Tell el-Farkha from phase 5, and imported pottery is also absent in this period. It seems that at the beginning of the Protodynastic period the Egyptians gradually abandoned the trade routes running through the eastern Delta and used new ones leading via Wadi Tumilat or across the Red Sea. The engravings in Wadi Ameyra (Sinai) with the names of Iry-Hor, Ka, and Narmer suggest that exploration of the natural resources of the Sinai and the maritime routes to Egypt were highly important. In this situation only a few imported products would have reached cities like Tell el-Farkha, which may explain the lack of both central warehouses and imported ceramics. Natural disasters also contributed significantly to the decline of Tell el-Farkha. The abandonment of the Western Kom, at the end of phase 5, clearly followed a major catastrophe caused by natural forces. The collapsed walls may be the result of this cataclysm. Evidence of a natural catastrophe that struck the settlement at the turn of our phases 5 and 6 can be found at the Eastern Kom as well.","PeriodicalId":36852,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/saac.26.2022.26.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research at Tell el-Farkha provides new opportunities to reconstruct the processes of Egyptian state formation. Seven main chronological phases are distinguished. One of the most important periods in the city’s history is phase 4 (Naqada IIIA–Naqada IIIB; ca. 3350–3200 BC). An administrative-cultic centre, a monumental warehouse, and the oldest Egyptian mastaba were created during this time. The inhabitants of Tell el- Farkha owed their prosperity to the trade with the Southern Levant. During phase 5 (Naqada IIIB to Naqada IIIC1; ca. 3200–3000 BC) several phenomena are evident that portended the gradual decline of the city, eventually leading to its abandonment. No evidence of major storage facilities has so far been discovered at Tell el-Farkha from phase 5, and imported pottery is also absent in this period. It seems that at the beginning of the Protodynastic period the Egyptians gradually abandoned the trade routes running through the eastern Delta and used new ones leading via Wadi Tumilat or across the Red Sea. The engravings in Wadi Ameyra (Sinai) with the names of Iry-Hor, Ka, and Narmer suggest that exploration of the natural resources of the Sinai and the maritime routes to Egypt were highly important. In this situation only a few imported products would have reached cities like Tell el-Farkha, which may explain the lack of both central warehouses and imported ceramics. Natural disasters also contributed significantly to the decline of Tell el-Farkha. The abandonment of the Western Kom, at the end of phase 5, clearly followed a major catastrophe caused by natural forces. The collapsed walls may be the result of this cataclysm. Evidence of a natural catastrophe that struck the settlement at the turn of our phases 5 and 6 can be found at the Eastern Kom as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tell El Farkha的第5阶段(Naqada IIIb–IIIc1)。发展的顶峰还是衰落的开端?
Tell el Farkha的研究为重建埃及国家形成过程提供了新的机会。区分了七个主要的时间阶段。该市历史上最重要的时期之一是第四阶段(Naqada IIIA–Naqada III B;约公元前3350–3200年)。一个行政邪教中心、一个纪念性仓库和最古老的埃及马斯塔巴都是在这段时间创建的。Tell el-Farkha的居民将他们的繁荣归功于与南黎凡特的贸易。在第五阶段(Naqada IIIB至Naqada III C1;约公元前3200年至3000年),有几个明显的现象预示着城市的逐渐衰落,最终导致其废弃。到目前为止,在Tell el Farkha还没有发现第五阶段主要储存设施的证据,这一时期也没有进口陶器。似乎在原始王朝时期开始时,埃及人逐渐放弃了穿过东部三角洲的贸易路线,转而使用经由瓦迪·图米拉特或穿越红海的新路线。Wadi Ameyra(西奈)刻有Iry Hor、Ka和Narmer的名字,这表明对西奈自然资源和通往埃及的海上路线的勘探非常重要。在这种情况下,只有少数进口产品会到达Tell el Farkha这样的城市,这可能解释了缺乏中央仓库和进口陶瓷的原因。自然灾害也对Tell el Farkha的衰落起到了重要作用。在第五阶段结束时,西科姆河被遗弃,显然是在自然力造成重大灾难之后。倒塌的墙壁可能是这场灾难的结果。在我们的第5阶段和第6阶段之交,可以在东科姆找到自然灾害袭击定居点的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization
Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Construction of Ancient Houses in Marina El-Alamein. Analysis of the Demand for Building Stone Représenter l’égyptologue, rendre hommage au Boulonnais. Le portrait d’Auguste Mariette par Florent Buret Evidence from a Nabataean Inscription Regarding Water and Cult in Nabataea, with Some Remarks on the Nabataean Royal Family La prime testimonianze della metallurgia nei colli albani (Roma, Italia Centrale) An investigation into the Pottery Flasks at the Sanandaj Archaeological Museum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1