Challenges of Distance Learning at Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Georgia

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Learning for Development Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.56059/jl4d.v10i1.726
T. Verulava, Kakha Shengelia, Giorgi Makharashvili
{"title":"Challenges of Distance Learning at Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Georgia","authors":"T. Verulava, Kakha Shengelia, Giorgi Makharashvili","doi":"10.56059/jl4d.v10i1.726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptation to distance learning, which is one of the most effective ways of fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic, presented numerous challenges to society and the economy. The study aims to assess the consequences of distance learning as a result of the pandemic from the perspective of students and teachers. Quantitative research was conducted. The students (n = 417) and teachers (n = 47) of all disciplines from Tbilisi universities (Republic of Georgia) participated in the research. Non-probability convenience sampling technique was used for the study. Respondents evaluated the process of distance learning positively since they had the opportunity to attend lectures from any location, thus, saving costs, learning new skills, gaining valuable experience, and having more free time left than before. Using a Likert scale, the distance learning process was positively assessed by students (3.2 points out of 5) and teachers (3 points out of 5). The majority of students (n = 288, 69%) preferred the synthesis of distance and auditory learning methods as they consider the student’s own choices in a superior way. Respondents pointed out some deficiencies, such as limited communication, technical access difficulties, low quality and malfunction of internet access, an inconvenient environment, students’ involvement process and complicated social relationships. The crisis caused by the COVID-19 epidemic has identified the need to advance the methods of high-quality acquisition of knowledge. It is preferable to equip university auditoriums with the necessary technical capabilities and to develop curricula that allow students to decide whether to attend lectures in the classroom or to participate online.","PeriodicalId":36056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning for Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v10i1.726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptation to distance learning, which is one of the most effective ways of fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic, presented numerous challenges to society and the economy. The study aims to assess the consequences of distance learning as a result of the pandemic from the perspective of students and teachers. Quantitative research was conducted. The students (n = 417) and teachers (n = 47) of all disciplines from Tbilisi universities (Republic of Georgia) participated in the research. Non-probability convenience sampling technique was used for the study. Respondents evaluated the process of distance learning positively since they had the opportunity to attend lectures from any location, thus, saving costs, learning new skills, gaining valuable experience, and having more free time left than before. Using a Likert scale, the distance learning process was positively assessed by students (3.2 points out of 5) and teachers (3 points out of 5). The majority of students (n = 288, 69%) preferred the synthesis of distance and auditory learning methods as they consider the student’s own choices in a superior way. Respondents pointed out some deficiencies, such as limited communication, technical access difficulties, low quality and malfunction of internet access, an inconvenient environment, students’ involvement process and complicated social relationships. The crisis caused by the COVID-19 epidemic has identified the need to advance the methods of high-quality acquisition of knowledge. It is preferable to equip university auditoriums with the necessary technical capabilities and to develop curricula that allow students to decide whether to attend lectures in the classroom or to participate online.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚2019冠状病毒病大流行期间大学远程学习面临的挑战
适应远程学习是应对新冠肺炎疫情最有效的方式之一,但也给社会和经济带来了诸多挑战。这项研究旨在从学生和教师的角度评估疫情对远程教育的影响。进行了定量研究。来自第比利斯大学(格鲁吉亚共和国)各学科的学生(n = 417)和教师(n = 47)参与了研究。本研究采用非概率方便抽样技术。受访者对远程学习过程的评价是积极的,因为他们有机会从任何地点参加讲座,因此节省了成本,学习了新技能,获得了宝贵的经验,并且比以前有更多的空闲时间。使用李克特量表,远程学习过程得到了学生(3.2分,满分5分)和教师(3分,满分5分)的积极评价。大多数学生(n = 288, 69%)更喜欢远程和听觉学习方法的综合,因为他们以更好的方式考虑学生自己的选择。受访者指出了一些不足之处,如交流有限、技术接入困难、上网质量低和故障、环境不方便、学生参与过程和复杂的社会关系。COVID-19疫情引发的危机表明,有必要推进高质量获取知识的方法。最好是为大学礼堂配备必要的技术能力,并制定课程,让学生决定是在课堂上听课还是在网上参加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Learning for Development
Journal of Learning for Development Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preparedness and Competencies of Higher Education Teachers to Teach Online: A Study in North-East India Publication Trends of Online Assessment in Physical Education Teacher Professional Development @scale: Achieving Quality and Sustainability in Zambia Teacher Participation in Online Collaborative Learning: Does It Improve Their Teaching Competency? Preferences and Views of School Students on the Integration of MOOCs in Performance Tasks of EFL Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1