Enforcement Quandary in Maritime Crimes: Espousing the Tangle of Prescriptive Jurisdiction

A. O. Abdulkadir
{"title":"Enforcement Quandary in Maritime Crimes: Espousing the Tangle of Prescriptive Jurisdiction","authors":"A. O. Abdulkadir","doi":"10.25041/plr.v4i1.2773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is inconceivable to have crimes without laws created prescribing or enforcing them. There must also be in existence a concomitant authority, either a state or an institution vested with the capacity to enforce these laws. In cases those crimes that occur on land, it is usually straightforward to determine the body vested with the legal power to prescribe and enforce these claims. Through qualitative and quantitative sampling, this study argues that for crimes that occur on the sea; territorial, internal or high seas, determining the state with jurisdiction is not so clear. This is because there is the possibility that various states could have competing rights to prescribe, adjudicate and enforce criminal laws in relation to a criminal offense. It is therefore important that a survey of these competing/concurrent rights of states be carried out. This research also investigates whether, by international law, these rights are actually concurrent or whether one is superior to the other. It also carried out an assessment of how the concurrent rights of states are exercised and how conflicts are resolved when they occur. The research founds that in real terms, one should be superior to the others and not so concurrent.","PeriodicalId":52575,"journal":{"name":"Pancasila and Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancasila and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v4i1.2773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is inconceivable to have crimes without laws created prescribing or enforcing them. There must also be in existence a concomitant authority, either a state or an institution vested with the capacity to enforce these laws. In cases those crimes that occur on land, it is usually straightforward to determine the body vested with the legal power to prescribe and enforce these claims. Through qualitative and quantitative sampling, this study argues that for crimes that occur on the sea; territorial, internal or high seas, determining the state with jurisdiction is not so clear. This is because there is the possibility that various states could have competing rights to prescribe, adjudicate and enforce criminal laws in relation to a criminal offense. It is therefore important that a survey of these competing/concurrent rights of states be carried out. This research also investigates whether, by international law, these rights are actually concurrent or whether one is superior to the other. It also carried out an assessment of how the concurrent rights of states are exercised and how conflicts are resolved when they occur. The research founds that in real terms, one should be superior to the others and not so concurrent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海事犯罪的执行困境:支持规定性管辖权的纠缠
如果没有法律的规定或执行,犯罪是不可想象的。还必须有一个相应的权力机构,无论是一个国家还是一个机构,都有能力执行这些法律。在发生在陆地上的犯罪案件中,通常很容易确定被赋予规定和执行这些索赔的法律权力的机构。通过定性和定量抽样,本研究认为,对于发生在海上的犯罪;领海、内海或公海,确定具有管辖权的国家并不那么清楚。这是因为各州有可能在制定、裁决和执行与刑事犯罪有关的刑法方面拥有相互竞争的权利。因此,对国家的这些相互竞争/同时存在的权利进行调查是很重要的。本研究还调查了根据国际法,这些权利是否实际上是并行的,或者一项权利是否优于另一项权利。它还对国家并行权利的行使方式以及冲突发生时如何解决进行了评估。研究发现,实际上,一个人应该优于其他人,而不是同时存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reflecting Pancasila in Environmental Crimes Enforcement: Diffusing Values to Indonesia’s Laws Re-evaluating the Legal and Institutional Complications Affecting the Protection of Women's Rights in Cameroon: The Need to Remedying the Odds Equity Crowdfunding: The Secondary Market’s Implementation and Legal Protection for Investors Using Technology-Based Crowdfunding Global Minimum Tax Implementation: Vietnam's Policy Recommendations Rethinking The Feasibility of Pancasila as a Scientific Paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1