Live and direct? Censorship and racialised public morality in grime and drill music

IF 0.7 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Popular Music Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1017/S0261143022000551
Alex de Lacey
{"title":"Live and direct? Censorship and racialised public morality in grime and drill music","authors":"Alex de Lacey","doi":"10.1017/S0261143022000551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses the linguistic policing of grime and UK drill music. Existing studies often focus on the immediacy of the penal system. This article will instead explore the extent to which institutional bodies uphold and maintain a programme of racialised censorship across radio broadcasts, seeking to understand how these value judgements impact upon creative practice. It presents an ethnographic study of three radio shows that aired on BBC 1Xtra, demonstrating through interviews and analysis how the broadcaster's censorship practice unfairly renders Black artists as dangerous with criminal associations. Lyrical assertions of musical skill are misread as direct threats, while evocations of the quotidian are seen to cause violence rather than reflect artists’ surroundings. Importantly, it will show how artists’ work and words are adversely discriminated against owing to a legacy of racialised public morality that imposes greater sanctions and restrictions on artistic output: radio personalities must strike a balance between presenting voyeuristic excitement about a genre, and the need to meet (racialised) editorial standards; producers assiduously monitor new slang to make sure that it is censored; and artists are encouraged to self-censor and alter their musical output, to protect themselves from unwanted ramifications.","PeriodicalId":46171,"journal":{"name":"Popular Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143022000551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses the linguistic policing of grime and UK drill music. Existing studies often focus on the immediacy of the penal system. This article will instead explore the extent to which institutional bodies uphold and maintain a programme of racialised censorship across radio broadcasts, seeking to understand how these value judgements impact upon creative practice. It presents an ethnographic study of three radio shows that aired on BBC 1Xtra, demonstrating through interviews and analysis how the broadcaster's censorship practice unfairly renders Black artists as dangerous with criminal associations. Lyrical assertions of musical skill are misread as direct threats, while evocations of the quotidian are seen to cause violence rather than reflect artists’ surroundings. Importantly, it will show how artists’ work and words are adversely discriminated against owing to a legacy of racialised public morality that imposes greater sanctions and restrictions on artistic output: radio personalities must strike a balance between presenting voyeuristic excitement about a genre, and the need to meet (racialised) editorial standards; producers assiduously monitor new slang to make sure that it is censored; and artists are encouraged to self-censor and alter their musical output, to protect themselves from unwanted ramifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直播和导演?grime和drill音乐中的审查制度和种族化的公共道德
摘要本文论述了格里姆和英国钻井音乐的语言监管。现有的研究往往侧重于刑罚制度的直接性。相反,本文将探讨机构在多大程度上支持和维持广播中的种族化审查计划,试图了解这些价值判断如何影响创造性实践。它对英国广播公司1Xtra播出的三个广播节目进行了民族志研究,通过采访和分析展示了该广播公司的审查做法如何不公平地使黑人艺术家与犯罪团伙有危险。对音乐技巧的抒情断言被误读为直接威胁,而对日常生活的唤起被视为引发暴力,而不是反映艺术家的周围环境。重要的是,它将展示艺术家的作品和文字是如何因种族化的公共道德遗产而受到不利歧视的,这种道德遗产对艺术输出施加了更大的制裁和限制:电台名人必须在呈现对一种类型的偷窥兴奋感和满足(种族化)编辑标准的必要性之间取得平衡;制片方不遗余力地监视新的俚语,以确保它受到审查;艺术家们被鼓励自我审查和改变他们的音乐输出,以保护自己免受不必要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Music
Popular Music MUSIC-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Popular Music is an international multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of the subject - from the formation of social group identities through popular music, to the workings of the global music industry, to how particular pieces of music are put together. The journal includes all kinds of popular music, whether rap or rai, jazz or rock, from any historical era and any geographical location. Popular Music carries articles by scholars from a variety of disciplines and theoretical perspectives. Each issue contains substantial, authoritative and influential articles, topical pieces, and reviews of a wide range of books.
期刊最新文献
Fluid revivals: retouring popular songs to restore a hydrological imaginary in the trans-Danube Celtic music, Shakespeare and fandom The Greatest Rock and Soul Band in the World? The Rolling Stones, genre and race Listening to Mapuche sound in Illapu Kardeş Türküler as ‘art action’: The multiple cultural heritages of Anatolia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1