The Trend of Omnichannel Trade Fairs. Are B2B Exhibitors Open to This Challenge? A Study on Portuguese Exhibitors

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1051712X.2023.2174825
Pedro Mendonça Silva, Arminda Paço, V. Moutinho
{"title":"The Trend of Omnichannel Trade Fairs. Are B2B Exhibitors Open to This Challenge? A Study on Portuguese Exhibitors","authors":"Pedro Mendonça Silva, Arminda Paço, V. Moutinho","doi":"10.1080/1051712X.2023.2174825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose Omnichannel is a trend also reaching events and their participants. So naturally, the trade fairs will be confronted with this reality of digital transformation. Given that exhibitors generally have the primacy of deciding to participate or not in a trade fair, this study aims to take this further, developing a representative model of exhibitors’ perception of an omnichannel trade fair. Design/methodology/approach This study used a quantitative approach through a survey. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used on the data collected from 306 Portuguese B2B exhibitors. Within the SEM method, the multi-group causal analysis was also used to analyze the moderating role of the type of exhibitors (between industries and B2B service). Findings A new model is described, incorporating the causal relationships between exhibitors’ perceived compatibility with omnichannel trade fairs and consequent engagement and loyalty. The model reveals the exhibitors’ understanding of omnichannel compatibility with the trade fair’s context, positively influencing their engagement and loyalty. The results also reveal no significant differences between the types of exhibitors (industries and B2B service). Research implications Trade fairs continue to be excellent business-to-business (B2B) marketing tools, and the intensity of the use of digital technologies at events will lead to new challenges and opportunities. But few studies have investigated this topic. Thus, this research investigated the exhibitors’ perception of omnichannel trade fairs and their consequences on engagement and loyalty. Therefore, this research is a relevant contribution to the literature on B2B trade fairs and raises new research lights Practical implications The great differential of omnichannel is precisely in integrating online and offline channels. This positive opening of exhibitors to omnichannel trade fairs extends multiple opportunities and challenges for exhibitors, organizers, and visitors. “Omnicanalization” of trade fairs will imply a convergence strategy that integrates all connectivity channels between the three parties. Originality/value This study’s findings address the gap in trade fair literature concerning the lack of an omnichannel approach, which is a fresh and pertinent perspective.","PeriodicalId":46235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","volume":"30 1","pages":"15 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2023.2174825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Omnichannel is a trend also reaching events and their participants. So naturally, the trade fairs will be confronted with this reality of digital transformation. Given that exhibitors generally have the primacy of deciding to participate or not in a trade fair, this study aims to take this further, developing a representative model of exhibitors’ perception of an omnichannel trade fair. Design/methodology/approach This study used a quantitative approach through a survey. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used on the data collected from 306 Portuguese B2B exhibitors. Within the SEM method, the multi-group causal analysis was also used to analyze the moderating role of the type of exhibitors (between industries and B2B service). Findings A new model is described, incorporating the causal relationships between exhibitors’ perceived compatibility with omnichannel trade fairs and consequent engagement and loyalty. The model reveals the exhibitors’ understanding of omnichannel compatibility with the trade fair’s context, positively influencing their engagement and loyalty. The results also reveal no significant differences between the types of exhibitors (industries and B2B service). Research implications Trade fairs continue to be excellent business-to-business (B2B) marketing tools, and the intensity of the use of digital technologies at events will lead to new challenges and opportunities. But few studies have investigated this topic. Thus, this research investigated the exhibitors’ perception of omnichannel trade fairs and their consequences on engagement and loyalty. Therefore, this research is a relevant contribution to the literature on B2B trade fairs and raises new research lights Practical implications The great differential of omnichannel is precisely in integrating online and offline channels. This positive opening of exhibitors to omnichannel trade fairs extends multiple opportunities and challenges for exhibitors, organizers, and visitors. “Omnicanalization” of trade fairs will imply a convergence strategy that integrates all connectivity channels between the three parties. Originality/value This study’s findings address the gap in trade fair literature concerning the lack of an omnichannel approach, which is a fresh and pertinent perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全渠道展会的发展趋势。B2B参展商对这一挑战持开放态度吗?葡萄牙参展商研究
摘要目的全渠道是一种趋势,也影响到活动及其参与者。因此,展会自然会面临数字化转型的现实。鉴于参展商通常在决定是否参加交易会方面具有首要地位,本研究旨在进一步推动这一点,开发一个参展商对全渠道交易会看法的代表性模型。设计/方法论/方法本研究通过调查采用了定量方法。结构方程建模(SEM)用于从306家葡萄牙B2B参展商收集的数据。在SEM方法中,还使用了多组因果分析来分析参展商类型(在行业和B2B服务之间)的调节作用。研究结果描述了一个新的模型,结合了参展商对全渠道贸易博览会的感知兼容性与随之而来的参与度和忠诚度之间的因果关系。该模型揭示了参展商对全渠道兼容性的理解,并对他们的参与度和忠诚度产生了积极影响。结果还显示,参展商类型(行业和B2B服务)之间没有显著差异。研究意义交易会仍然是优秀的企业对企业(B2B)营销工具,活动中数字技术的密集使用将带来新的挑战和机遇。但很少有研究对这个话题进行调查。因此,本研究调查了参展商对全渠道交易会的看法及其对参与度和忠诚度的影响。因此,本研究对B2B交易会的文献做出了相关贡献,并提出了新的研究思路。实际意义。全渠道的巨大差异正是在于整合了线上和线下渠道。参展商对全渠道贸易博览会的积极开放为参展商、组织者和观众带来了多重机遇和挑战。交易会的“全渠道化”将意味着融合三方之间所有连接渠道的融合战略。原创性/价值这项研究的发现解决了贸易博览会文献中关于缺乏全渠道方法的空白,这是一个新鲜而中肯的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
35.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing® encourages diversity in approaches to business marketing theory development, research methods, and managerial problem solving. An editorial board comprised of outstanding, internationally recognized scholars and practitioners ensures that the journal maintains impeccable standards of relevance and rigorous scholarship. The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing features: •basic and applied research that reflects current business marketing theory, methodology, and practice •articles from leading researchers covering topics of mutual interest for the business and academic communities
期刊最新文献
Examining Buyers’ Attitudes Toward Climate Change Policy and Their firms’ Corporate Reputation: The Serial Mediation Effect of Suppliers’ Engagement and Commitment Collaborating with Public Research Institutions: Using Strategic Intent and Co-Created Value to Gain Strategic Opportunities in New Product Development The Role of Digital Communication Technologies Through Customer and Market Knowledge in B2B on Sales Performance and Satisfaction Delving into the Architecture of International B2B Relationship Marketing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Business Convergence to Partnership Effectiveness “Business-to-Business-to-Brain?” Reviewing Neuroscience Research in B2B-Marketing Using TCCM Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1