Treatment Outcomes of Venlafaxine and Duloxetine in Refractory Burning Mouth Syndrome Patients

Moon-Jong Kim, H. Kho
{"title":"Treatment Outcomes of Venlafaxine and Duloxetine in Refractory Burning Mouth Syndrome Patients","authors":"Moon-Jong Kim, H. Kho","doi":"10.14476/JOMP.2019.44.3.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Received July 31, 2019 Revised August 30, 2019 Accepted August 30, 2019 Purpose: Venlafaxine and duloxetine have been shown to be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain disorders. However, knowledge about the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine on burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is still insufficient. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine on refractory BMS patients. Methods: Twelve refractory BMS patients who were prescribed venlafaxine or duloxetine were included in this study. These patients did not respond to previous administration of clonazepam, alpha-lipoic acid, gabapentin, and nortriptyline. All participants were the primary type of BMS patients who had no local and systemic factors related to the oral burning sensation. The intensities of oral symptoms following venlafaxine or duloxetine administration were compared with those before administration and at baseline. Results: Venlafaxine and duloxetine were prescribed to four and nine patients, respectively. One patient was prescribed both medications in turn. Among them, only two patients showed improvement of oral symptoms without side effects. In the other ten patients, symptoms failed to improve. Six of them reported that the drug was ineffective, and four of them stopped taking the medications on their own due to intolerable side effects, such as insomnia, constipation, drowsiness, dizziness, and xerostomia. Conclusions: Venlafaxine and duloxetine may only relieve oral symptoms in a minority of refractory BMS patients. Further large-scale studies are needed to determine the potential clinical factors that could predict the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine.","PeriodicalId":91332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral medicine and pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral medicine and pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14476/JOMP.2019.44.3.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Received July 31, 2019 Revised August 30, 2019 Accepted August 30, 2019 Purpose: Venlafaxine and duloxetine have been shown to be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain disorders. However, knowledge about the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine on burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is still insufficient. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine on refractory BMS patients. Methods: Twelve refractory BMS patients who were prescribed venlafaxine or duloxetine were included in this study. These patients did not respond to previous administration of clonazepam, alpha-lipoic acid, gabapentin, and nortriptyline. All participants were the primary type of BMS patients who had no local and systemic factors related to the oral burning sensation. The intensities of oral symptoms following venlafaxine or duloxetine administration were compared with those before administration and at baseline. Results: Venlafaxine and duloxetine were prescribed to four and nine patients, respectively. One patient was prescribed both medications in turn. Among them, only two patients showed improvement of oral symptoms without side effects. In the other ten patients, symptoms failed to improve. Six of them reported that the drug was ineffective, and four of them stopped taking the medications on their own due to intolerable side effects, such as insomnia, constipation, drowsiness, dizziness, and xerostomia. Conclusions: Venlafaxine and duloxetine may only relieve oral symptoms in a minority of refractory BMS patients. Further large-scale studies are needed to determine the potential clinical factors that could predict the efficacy of venlafaxine and duloxetine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文拉法辛和度洛西汀治疗难治性灼口综合征的疗效
目的:文拉法辛和度洛西汀已被证明可有效治疗神经性疼痛疾病。然而,关于文拉法辛和度洛西汀治疗灼口综合征(BMS)的疗效的知识仍然不足。本研究的目的是探讨文拉法辛和度洛西汀对难治性BMS患者的疗效。方法:选取12例服用文拉法辛或度洛西汀的难治性BMS患者作为研究对象。这些患者对先前给予氯硝西泮、α -硫辛酸、加巴喷丁和去甲替林没有反应。所有的参与者都是BMS患者的主要类型,没有与口腔烧灼感相关的局部和全身因素。将文拉法辛或度洛西汀给药后的口腔症状强度与给药前和基线时进行比较。结果:文拉法辛处方4例,度洛西汀处方9例。一名患者轮流服用这两种药物。其中,仅有2例患者口腔症状改善且无副作用。另外10名患者的症状没有改善。其中6人报告说药物无效,其中4人因失眠、便秘、嗜睡、头晕、口干等难以忍受的副作用而自行停止服用。结论:文拉法辛和度洛西汀仅能缓解少数难治性BMS患者的口腔症状。需要进一步的大规模研究来确定可能预测文拉法辛和度洛西汀疗效的潜在临床因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma of the Labial Minor Salivary Glands: Case Report Orofacial Pain and Nonodotogenic Toothache of Cardiac Origin: Case Report Reflecting on the Evolution and Future of the Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain Standardized Protocols for Measuring Volatile Sulfur Compounds: Scientific Foundations and Methodologies Application of Fluoride for Dental Caries Prevention in Older Adults with Dry Mouth: a Clinical Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1