Men's Gender Norms and Gender-Hierarchy-Legitimizing Ideologies: The Effect of Priming Traditional Masculinity Versus a Feminization of Men's Norms.

IF 1.4 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Gender Issues Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s12147-022-09308-8
Giulia Valsecchi, Vincenzo Iacoviello, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, Juan M Falomir-Pichastor
{"title":"Men's Gender Norms and Gender-Hierarchy-Legitimizing Ideologies: The Effect of Priming Traditional Masculinity Versus a Feminization of Men's Norms.","authors":"Giulia Valsecchi, Vincenzo Iacoviello, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, Juan M Falomir-Pichastor","doi":"10.1007/s12147-022-09308-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary evidence suggests that masculinity is changing, adopting perceived feminine traits in the process. Implications of this new masculine norm on gender relations remain unclear. Our research aims to better understand the influence of changing masculine norms on men's endorsement of gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies. Based on Precarious Manhood Theory and Social Role Theory, we conducted two quasi-experimental studies (<i>N</i> = 412) in which we first assessed heterosexual men's motivation to protect traditional masculinity. Then, we informed them that men's gender norms are becoming more feminine (feminization norm condition) or are remaining masculine in a traditional sense (traditional norm condition). In the third (baseline-control) condition, participants received no information about men's gender norms. Finally, we assessed the extent to which participants endorsed gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies, namely sexism (Study 1) and masculinist beliefs (Study 2). Results showed that men who were less motivated to protect traditional masculinity were less likely to endorse gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies when exposed to the feminization and control conditions compared to the traditional norm condition. The implications of these findings for gender equality and gender relations are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45643,"journal":{"name":"Gender Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":"145-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689301/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-022-09308-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Contemporary evidence suggests that masculinity is changing, adopting perceived feminine traits in the process. Implications of this new masculine norm on gender relations remain unclear. Our research aims to better understand the influence of changing masculine norms on men's endorsement of gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies. Based on Precarious Manhood Theory and Social Role Theory, we conducted two quasi-experimental studies (N = 412) in which we first assessed heterosexual men's motivation to protect traditional masculinity. Then, we informed them that men's gender norms are becoming more feminine (feminization norm condition) or are remaining masculine in a traditional sense (traditional norm condition). In the third (baseline-control) condition, participants received no information about men's gender norms. Finally, we assessed the extent to which participants endorsed gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies, namely sexism (Study 1) and masculinist beliefs (Study 2). Results showed that men who were less motivated to protect traditional masculinity were less likely to endorse gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies when exposed to the feminization and control conditions compared to the traditional norm condition. The implications of these findings for gender equality and gender relations are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性的性别规范与性别等级合法化的意识形态:传统男性气质与男性规范的女性化的影响
当代证据表明,男性气质正在发生变化,在这一过程中,人们逐渐接受了女性特征。这种新的男性规范对两性关系的影响尚不清楚。我们的研究旨在更好地理解男性规范的变化对男性认可性别等级合法化意识形态的影响。基于岌岌可危的男子气概理论和社会角色理论,我们进行了两项准实验研究(N = 412),首先评估了异性恋男性保护传统男子气概的动机。然后,我们告诉他们,男性的性别规范正在变得更加女性化(女性化规范条件),或者在传统意义上保持男性化(传统规范条件)。在第三个(基线对照)条件下,参与者没有收到关于男性性别规范的信息。最后,我们评估了参与者支持性别等级合法化意识形态的程度,即性别歧视(研究1)和男性主义信仰(研究2)。结果表明,在女性化和控制条件下,与传统规范条件相比,保护传统男性气质的动机较低的男性更不可能支持性别等级合法化意识形态。讨论了这些发现对两性平等和两性关系的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Issues
Gender Issues SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Gender Issues is interdisciplinary and cross-national in scope focusing on gender and gender equity.  The journal publishes basic and applied research examining gender relationships as well as the impact of economic, legal, political, and social forces on those relationships across four domains: 1.  Understanding gender socialization, personality, and behavior in a gendered context.2.  Exploring the wide range of relationships within the gender spectrum, such as acquaintances, friendships, romantic, and professional relationships. 3.  Assessing the impact of economic, legal, political, and social changes on gender identity, expression, and gender relations.4.  Interpreting the impact of economic, legal, political, and social changes on the aspirations, status and roles of people internationally.
期刊最新文献
Patriarchal Masculinities and Cyberbullying on Facebook: Unraveling Interconnections and Implications in the Context of Bangladesh Responding to the Pandemic: Missed Opportunities in Gender and Health Gender or Gendered Demand of Care? Migration Decision-Making Processes of Nepali Care Workers Examining the Role of Childhood Experiences in Gender Identity and Expression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Using Social Learning Theory Gender-Differentiated Labor and Adaptation Effects of Climate Change in Rural Areas: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1