Decentring the ‘resilient teacher’: exploring interactions between individuals and their social ecologies

IF 1.5 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cambridge Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2021.2011139
J. Oldfield, S. Ainsworth
{"title":"Decentring the ‘resilient teacher’: exploring interactions between individuals and their social ecologies","authors":"J. Oldfield, S. Ainsworth","doi":"10.1080/0305764X.2021.2011139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The teacher retention crisis has led to a strong discourse around the need for teachers to ‘build their resilience’, which places the responsibility for coping at the feet of the individual teacher. Contemporary research, however, supports a social-ecological approach, which takes account of environmental influences within the resilience process. This study draws upon five focus groups (28 teachers) to present evidence for complex interdependencies between risk and protective factors within the resilience process. The authors demonstrate the prevalence of indirect (mediation and moderation) effects operating primarily between rather than within ecological levels, characterised by contextual factors predominately influencing individual factors, rather than the other way round. These findings provide support for the notion of equifinality – the idea that there are multiple routes to resilience – and advocate a flexible approach to promoting teacher resilience, involving experimentation and collaboration across ecological levels.","PeriodicalId":47730,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"409 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.2011139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The teacher retention crisis has led to a strong discourse around the need for teachers to ‘build their resilience’, which places the responsibility for coping at the feet of the individual teacher. Contemporary research, however, supports a social-ecological approach, which takes account of environmental influences within the resilience process. This study draws upon five focus groups (28 teachers) to present evidence for complex interdependencies between risk and protective factors within the resilience process. The authors demonstrate the prevalence of indirect (mediation and moderation) effects operating primarily between rather than within ecological levels, characterised by contextual factors predominately influencing individual factors, rather than the other way round. These findings provide support for the notion of equifinality – the idea that there are multiple routes to resilience – and advocate a flexible approach to promoting teacher resilience, involving experimentation and collaboration across ecological levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“有弹性的老师”:探索个人与其社会生态之间的互动
摘要:教师留任危机引发了一场关于教师“建立韧性”的强烈讨论,这将应对责任置于教师个人的脚下。然而,当代研究支持社会生态学方法,该方法在恢复过程中考虑了环境影响。这项研究利用了五个重点小组(28名教师),为恢复力过程中风险和保护因素之间的复杂相互依存关系提供了证据。作者证明了间接(中介和适度)效应的普遍性,这种效应主要在生态水平之间而不是在生态水平内发挥作用,其特征是背景因素主要影响个体因素,而不是反过来。这些发现支持了公平性的概念,即有多种途径可以提高教师的适应力,并倡导一种灵活的方法来提高教师的应变能力,包括跨生态层面的实验和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cambridge Journal of Education
Cambridge Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Cambridge Journal of Education publishes original refereed articles on all aspects of education, with a particular emphasis on work that contributes to a shared understanding amongst academic researchers, theorists, practising teachers, policy-makers and educational administrators. The journal also welcomes the submission of systematic review articles that summarise and offer new insights into specific areas of educational concern. With a wide international readership, Cambridge Journal of Education publishes contributions drawn from different educational systems and cultures enabling continued in-depth discussion of global educational theory, policy and practice. The journal’s Special Issue programme encourages and stimulates focused discussion and engagement with significant themes and responses to topics raised by readers and contributors. Cambridge Journal of Education welcomes proposals for future editions.
期刊最新文献
Academisation, neoliberal technologies of governance and the rapid growth of multi-academy trusts (MATs) in England “Sometimes it feels like we are puppets, here to listen to but not speak”: listening to the voices of young Bangladeshi students about barriers to well-being at school Funds of courage: advancing social justice in children’s reading for pleasure Indigenous youth wellbeing in higher education: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies Adolescents’ and teachers’ experience of shared education: a small-scale qualitative study in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1