The effect of social pension on consumption among older adults in Korea

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of the Economics of Ageing Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100364
Ji Young Kang , Sojung Park , Seoyeon Ahn
{"title":"The effect of social pension on consumption among older adults in Korea","authors":"Ji Young Kang ,&nbsp;Sojung Park ,&nbsp;Seoyeon Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Focusing on the Korean case of social pensions, we evaluated the extent to which the basic pension scheme (BPS), a means-tested public assistance program, affects consumption. Data came from two years (2013 and 2015) of the Korea Welfare Panel Study (KoWePS) (N = 3615 households). Applying the Propensity Score Matching (PSM), </span>Difference in Difference<span> (DiD), and triple difference (DDD) approach, we used linear regression models with the fixed-effect model to estimate the effects of BPS. We found a significant increase in the expenditure ratio in absolute and relative poverty levels and total expenditure. BPS led to increased spending on essential living items (food, clothing) and health care, but not leisure. The results also supported that the social pension positively affects spending among the more disadvantaged population as the beneficial effects were more prominent among those living alone than those living with other household members. However, we did not find a significant effect among the poor, likely because the Korean policies reduce the benefits obtained from other public assistance programs if the poor old adult receives BPS benefits. Our findings provide useful insights for economies that encounter challenges associated with rapid population aging.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":45848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X21000578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Focusing on the Korean case of social pensions, we evaluated the extent to which the basic pension scheme (BPS), a means-tested public assistance program, affects consumption. Data came from two years (2013 and 2015) of the Korea Welfare Panel Study (KoWePS) (N = 3615 households). Applying the Propensity Score Matching (PSM), Difference in Difference (DiD), and triple difference (DDD) approach, we used linear regression models with the fixed-effect model to estimate the effects of BPS. We found a significant increase in the expenditure ratio in absolute and relative poverty levels and total expenditure. BPS led to increased spending on essential living items (food, clothing) and health care, but not leisure. The results also supported that the social pension positively affects spending among the more disadvantaged population as the beneficial effects were more prominent among those living alone than those living with other household members. However, we did not find a significant effect among the poor, likely because the Korean policies reduce the benefits obtained from other public assistance programs if the poor old adult receives BPS benefits. Our findings provide useful insights for economies that encounter challenges associated with rapid population aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会养老金对韩国老年人消费的影响
以韩国的社会养老金为例,我们评估了基本养老金计划(BPS)对消费的影响程度,这是一项经过经济状况调查的公共援助计划。数据是根据韩国福利委员会(KoWePS)的2013年和2015年(N = 3615个家庭)进行的。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)、差中差(DiD)和三差(DDD)方法,采用线性回归模型和固定效应模型来估计BPS的效果。我们发现,绝对贫困水平和相对贫困水平的支出比例以及总支出比例显著上升。BPS导致了基本生活用品(食物、衣服)和医疗保健支出的增加,但没有导致休闲支出的增加。结果还支持社会养老金对弱势群体的消费产生积极影响,因为独居者的有益影响比与其他家庭成员一起生活的人更为突出。然而,我们在穷人中没有发现显著的影响,可能是因为韩国的政策减少了从其他公共援助项目中获得的好处,如果贫穷的老年人获得BPS福利。我们的研究结果为面临人口快速老龄化挑战的经济体提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing (JEoA) is an international academic journal that publishes original theoretical and empirical research dealing with the interaction between demographic change and the economy. JEoA encompasses both microeconomic and macroeconomic perspectives and offers a platform for the discussion of topics including labour, health, and family economics, social security, income distribution, social mobility, immigration, productivity, structural change, economic growth and development. JEoA also solicits papers that have a policy focus.
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational redistribution in a pay-as-you-go pension system Understanding the heterogeneous health effect of retirement by tracking daily activities Retirement consumption puzzle in Japan: Insights from pension and senior worker employment policy changes An empirical investigation of health dynamics of elders in China Regressivity in public pension systems: The case of Peru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1