Do patterns of intra-specific variability and community weighted-means of leaf traits correspond? An example from alpine plants

Q3 Environmental Science Botanica Pacifica Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.17581/bp.2020.09109
V. Onipchenko, A. Rozhin, V. Smirnov, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, T. Elumeeva, O. P. Khubieva, K. V. Dudova, N. A. Soudzilovskaia, J. Cornelissen
{"title":"Do patterns of intra-specific variability and community weighted-means of leaf traits correspond? An example from alpine plants","authors":"V. Onipchenko, A. Rozhin, V. Smirnov, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, T. Elumeeva, O. P. Khubieva, K. V. Dudova, N. A. Soudzilovskaia, J. Cornelissen","doi":"10.17581/bp.2020.09109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intraspecific variability of the traits is usually less than interspecific, but directions of inter-and intraspecific variation along environmental gradients are not well studied. For 17 alpine species we test a hypothesis that the direction of intraspecific variation in leaf traits among different communities along an environmental gradient coincides consistently with community weighted mean (CWM) trait variation at the community level along the same gradient. We obtained two groups of leaf traits according to their response to CWM and topographic (snow depth and snow melt) gradients. For leaf mass and area intraspecific variation corresponded to CWM variation among communities. SLA, water content and leaf thickness patterns within species changed directly among communities according to the toposequence (snowmelt gradient). These results are well expressed for forbs, but mostly they were not significant for graminoids. For leaf area we obtained opposite response of forbs and graminoids to snowmelt gradient. Forbs increased, but graminoids decreased leaf area when snow depth increased. Intraspecific trait variation across natural gradients does not necessarily follow that for interspecific or community-level variation.","PeriodicalId":37724,"journal":{"name":"Botanica Pacifica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanica Pacifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2020.09109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Intraspecific variability of the traits is usually less than interspecific, but directions of inter-and intraspecific variation along environmental gradients are not well studied. For 17 alpine species we test a hypothesis that the direction of intraspecific variation in leaf traits among different communities along an environmental gradient coincides consistently with community weighted mean (CWM) trait variation at the community level along the same gradient. We obtained two groups of leaf traits according to their response to CWM and topographic (snow depth and snow melt) gradients. For leaf mass and area intraspecific variation corresponded to CWM variation among communities. SLA, water content and leaf thickness patterns within species changed directly among communities according to the toposequence (snowmelt gradient). These results are well expressed for forbs, but mostly they were not significant for graminoids. For leaf area we obtained opposite response of forbs and graminoids to snowmelt gradient. Forbs increased, but graminoids decreased leaf area when snow depth increased. Intraspecific trait variation across natural gradients does not necessarily follow that for interspecific or community-level variation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种内变异模式和群落叶片性状加权平均值相对应吗?以高山植物为例
性状的种内变异通常小于种间变异,但沿环境梯度的种间和种内变异方向没有得到很好的研究。对于17个高山物种,我们检验了一个假设,即沿环境梯度的不同群落之间叶片性状的种内变异方向与沿同一梯度的群落水平上的群落加权平均(CWM)性状变异一致。根据叶片对CWM和地形(雪深和融雪)梯度的响应,我们获得了两组叶片性状。对于叶质量和面积,种内变异对应于群落间CWM的变异。物种内SLA、含水量和叶片厚度模式根据地形序列(融雪梯度)在群落间直接变化。这些结果在forbs中得到了很好的表达,但在大多数情况下,它们对禾本科植物来说并不显著。就叶面积而言,我们获得了forbs和Graminoid对融雪梯度的相反响应。随着积雪深度的增加,牧草增加,但类禾本科的叶面积减少。跨自然梯度的种内性状变异并不一定遵循种间或群落水平的变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Botanica Pacifica
Botanica Pacifica Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Botanica Pacifica (BP) publishes peer-reviewed, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, fungi, and lichens). BP requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of contemporary problems of plant biology. While the geographic focus of the journal is the Pacific region, research submissions that demonstrate clear linkages with other regions are welcome. BP aims to foster the exchange of research ideas between countries with diverse cultures and languages.
期刊最新文献
Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of the Tolmachev reservoir (Kamchatka, Russia) New varieties of Elymus ciliaris (Poaceae: Triticeae) from the Russian Far East The CSR strategies of alpine plants and community functional diversity in the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan mountains Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani – a new class of zonal tundra vegetation New syntaxa of tundra vegetation in the Siberian sector of the Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1