Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language, Culture and Curriculum Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124
Weiqing Wang, Shaofeng Li
{"title":"Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study","authors":"Weiqing Wang, Shaofeng Li","doi":"10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.","PeriodicalId":17945,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","volume":"34 1","pages":"35 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美英语课堂中纠正反馈与学习者吸收的比较研究
摘要教学语境在外语学习中起着至关重要的作用。本研究比较了在美国英语作为第二语言(ESL)和中国英语作为外语(EFL)这两种高等教育背景下,纠正反馈(CF)的发生率和学习者的吸收率。分析36 h的观察数据表明:(1)重铸在两种情况下都是最受欢迎的反馈类型,但在EFL课程中的比例远高于ESL课程;(2) CF在重音方面的分布相似,但在语言焦点方面有显著差异;和(3)两种环境下的吸收和修复的总体频率接近,但在明确纠正后,EFL课程中的吸收和恢复率显著高于ESL课程。这些发现表明,尽管ESL和EFL环境中的师生互动呈现出一种共同的趋势,但CF和吸收并不是无上下文的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language, Culture and Curriculum is a well-established journal that seeks to enhance the understanding of the relations between the three dimensions of its title. It welcomes work dealing with a wide range of languages (mother tongues, global English, foreign, minority, immigrant, heritage, or endangered languages) in the context of bilingual and multilingual education and first, second or additional language learning. It focuses on research into cultural content, literacy or intercultural and transnational studies, usually related to curriculum development, organisation or implementation. The journal also includes studies of language instruction, teacher training, teaching methods and language-in-education policy. It is open to investigations of language attitudes, beliefs and identities as well as to contributions dealing with language learning processes and language practices inside and outside of the classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum encourages submissions from a variety of disciplinary approaches. Since its inception in 1988 the journal has tried to cover a wide range of topics and it has disseminated articles from authors from all continents.
期刊最新文献
“It’s exactly how I pictured it!”: the construction and impact of the tourist gaze in study abroad Affordances, challenges, and possibilities of Hallyu in the classroom: Korean language instructors’ perspectives Agency, authority and universality in the promotion of global ELT textbook series Examining the resilience of two early career world language teachers: a two-year case study Localising international schools in multilingual Switzerland: from parental strategies to institutional dual-language programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1