Another Hole in China’s ‘Great Wall of Money’? Conceptualizing the Involvement of Foreign Investments in the Chinese Non-performing Loans Market Under the US-China Trade Deal

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2022031
W. Shen, Beibei Zhang
{"title":"Another Hole in China’s ‘Great Wall of Money’? Conceptualizing the Involvement of Foreign Investments in the Chinese Non-performing Loans Market Under the US-China Trade Deal","authors":"W. Shen, Beibei Zhang","doi":"10.54648/trad2022031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In early 2020, the world economy plunged into a major recession due to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and non-performing loans (NPLs) went back on the agenda for banks and regulators in many countries. This is a timely article as it focuses on an attention-drawing regulatory catalyst for changes to the position of foreign investors in the Chinese NPLs disposal market. It uses the Phase One Trade Deal between the United States (US) and China as an opportunity to assess whether or not China is ready to shift towards a new approach for foreign investors trading in the primary NPLs market. Existing studies have been quick to conclude that the US–China Phase One Trade Deal will lead to a policy shift in the Chinese NPLs market through Article 4.5 contained therein. If the US– China Phase One Trade Deal is reviewed in its entirety and if China’s concepts of stability, its state ownership policy and its recent treaty practice are all carefully considered, however, the involvement of foreign investment in the NPLs market may be viewed less optimistically. Using the US–China Phase One Trade Deal as a prism, it can be seen that bilateralism in trade policy may have its own limitations. China’s perception of and policy towards international institutions and regimes show its willingness to integrate into the existing multilateral trade order even though its policy is still obscure and hesitant. Washington should be prepared to soften its decoupling stance to promote cooperation and coordination of the two countries in multilateral institutions.\nChina, United States, US–China Phase One Trade Deal, US–China Trade Tensions, Non-Performing Loans, Foreign Investment, State-Ownership, Financial Stability, Bilateralism, Multilateralism","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2022031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early 2020, the world economy plunged into a major recession due to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and non-performing loans (NPLs) went back on the agenda for banks and regulators in many countries. This is a timely article as it focuses on an attention-drawing regulatory catalyst for changes to the position of foreign investors in the Chinese NPLs disposal market. It uses the Phase One Trade Deal between the United States (US) and China as an opportunity to assess whether or not China is ready to shift towards a new approach for foreign investors trading in the primary NPLs market. Existing studies have been quick to conclude that the US–China Phase One Trade Deal will lead to a policy shift in the Chinese NPLs market through Article 4.5 contained therein. If the US– China Phase One Trade Deal is reviewed in its entirety and if China’s concepts of stability, its state ownership policy and its recent treaty practice are all carefully considered, however, the involvement of foreign investment in the NPLs market may be viewed less optimistically. Using the US–China Phase One Trade Deal as a prism, it can be seen that bilateralism in trade policy may have its own limitations. China’s perception of and policy towards international institutions and regimes show its willingness to integrate into the existing multilateral trade order even though its policy is still obscure and hesitant. Washington should be prepared to soften its decoupling stance to promote cooperation and coordination of the two countries in multilateral institutions. China, United States, US–China Phase One Trade Deal, US–China Trade Tensions, Non-Performing Loans, Foreign Investment, State-Ownership, Financial Stability, Bilateralism, Multilateralism
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国“金钱长城”又出了一个洞?在中美贸易协定下,外国投资参与中国不良贷款市场的概念
2020年初,由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,世界经济陷入严重衰退,不良贷款(NPLs)重新回到许多国家银行和监管机构的议程上。这是一篇及时的文章,因为它关注的是外国投资者在中国不良贷款处置市场地位变化的监管催化剂。本文以中美第一阶段贸易协议为契机,评估中国是否准备向外国投资者在初级不良贷款市场交易的新方式转变。现有的研究很快得出结论,美中第一阶段贸易协议将通过其中包含的第4.5条导致中国不良贷款市场的政策转变。然而,如果全面审查美中第一阶段贸易协议,如果仔细考虑中国的稳定概念、国有制政策和最近的条约实践,那么外国投资参与不良贷款市场可能就不那么乐观了。以中美第一阶段贸易协议为棱镜,可以看出贸易政策的双边主义可能有其局限性。中国对国际机构和制度的看法和政策表明,中国愿意融入现有的多边贸易秩序,尽管其政策仍然模糊不清和犹豫不决。为了促进两国在多边机构中的合作与协调,美国应该准备好软化脱钩立场。中国,美国,中美第一阶段贸易协议,中美贸易紧张局势,不良贷款,外国投资,国有,金融稳定,双边主义,多边主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
The Recent Development On The Discipline Of Services Domestic Regulation And The Debate On The Necessity Test: From The Perspective Of The CPTPP, RCEP, And SDR Reference Paper Giving Meaning To Limitations How Can International Trade Law Discipline Nudging Through Ecolabels? Korea’s Trade Policy Beyond Free Trade Agreements Exogenous Shocks And The Dynamics Between Geopolitics And Global Trade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1