Special Issue “More Expendable than ‘Essential’: Black Workers’ Rights and Racial Class Struggles Under the COVID Crisis”

Q2 Arts and Humanities Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1177/0160449x221121361
J. Trotter
{"title":"Special Issue “More Expendable than ‘Essential’: Black Workers’ Rights and Racial Class Struggles Under the COVID Crisis”","authors":"J. Trotter","doi":"10.1177/0160449x221121361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African American labor and working-class history is a key fi eld of research, knowl-edge, and inspiration for building a stronger and more viable contemporary labor movement within and beyond the borders of the United States today. But Black labor history as an intellectual discipline is deeply rooted in the early twentieth-century struggle against the emergence of the White supremacist order in American society. Both lay and professional Jim Crow era White writers treated Black workers as intel-lectually “ inferior ” and incapable of adapting to the labor requirements of the industrial machine. Accordingly, they de fi ned Black workers as “ expendable ” and justi fi ed the employment of Black workers in the most precarious bottom rungs of the nation ’ s expanding urban industrial economy. The fi rst generation of African American labor historians — including Charles Abram L. Harris, Spiro, W. E. B. Du Bois, and others countered such racist perspectives on African American workers and prepared the groundwork for the rise of anti-racist treatments of Black workers during the mid to late twentieth century. Building upon but moving well beyond the insights of their early twentieth-century counterparts, recent scholars of Black labor history not only demonstrate how Black workers labored under the “ special handicaps of race and color, ” in addition to the prevailing obstacles that hampered the lives of all wage earners in capitalist America. They also address the challenges that Black workers encountered in building their own communities in the face of rising class, gender, and ideological divisions and con fl icts within their own ranks: fi rst during the transition from slavery to freedom and later during the Great Migration and the rise of the urban industrial working class.","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x221121361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

African American labor and working-class history is a key fi eld of research, knowl-edge, and inspiration for building a stronger and more viable contemporary labor movement within and beyond the borders of the United States today. But Black labor history as an intellectual discipline is deeply rooted in the early twentieth-century struggle against the emergence of the White supremacist order in American society. Both lay and professional Jim Crow era White writers treated Black workers as intel-lectually “ inferior ” and incapable of adapting to the labor requirements of the industrial machine. Accordingly, they de fi ned Black workers as “ expendable ” and justi fi ed the employment of Black workers in the most precarious bottom rungs of the nation ’ s expanding urban industrial economy. The fi rst generation of African American labor historians — including Charles Abram L. Harris, Spiro, W. E. B. Du Bois, and others countered such racist perspectives on African American workers and prepared the groundwork for the rise of anti-racist treatments of Black workers during the mid to late twentieth century. Building upon but moving well beyond the insights of their early twentieth-century counterparts, recent scholars of Black labor history not only demonstrate how Black workers labored under the “ special handicaps of race and color, ” in addition to the prevailing obstacles that hampered the lives of all wage earners in capitalist America. They also address the challenges that Black workers encountered in building their own communities in the face of rising class, gender, and ideological divisions and con fl icts within their own ranks: fi rst during the transition from slavery to freedom and later during the Great Migration and the rise of the urban industrial working class.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特刊“比‘本质’更容易消耗:新冠肺炎危机下的黑人工人权利和种族阶级斗争”
非裔美国人的劳工和工人阶级历史是研究、知识和灵感的关键领域,有助于在当今美国境内外建立一个更强大、更可行的当代劳工运动。但黑人劳工史作为一门知识学科,深深植根于20世纪初反对白人至上主义秩序在美国社会出现的斗争。吉姆·克劳时代的非专业和专业白人作家都认为黑人工人在理论上“低人一等”,无法适应工业机器的劳动要求。因此,他们将黑人工人定义为“可消耗的”,并将黑人工人的就业定义为国家不断扩张的城市工业经济中最不稳定的底层。第一代非裔美国劳工历史学家——包括Charles Abram L.Harris、Spiro、W.E.B.Du Bois和其他人——反驳了对非裔美国工人的种族主义观点,并为20世纪中后期黑人工人反种族主义待遇的兴起奠定了基础。最近的黑人劳工史学者在20世纪初同行的见解的基础上,不仅展示了黑人工人是如何在“种族和肤色的特殊障碍”下工作的,而且还展示了资本主义美国所有工薪阶层生活中普遍存在的障碍。他们还解决了黑人工人在建设自己的社区时遇到的挑战,面对他们自己队伍中不断上升的阶级、性别和意识形态分歧和冲突:首先是在从奴隶制向自由的过渡期间,后来是在大移民和城市工业工人阶级的崛起期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Benefits and Limitations of Non-Degree Credentials: The Case of Apprenticeship in Oregon The Potential and Limits of Spontaneous Labor Activism on Social Media: The Search for Justice among Chinese Restaurant Workers Book Review: The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor by Nolan, Hamilton Book Review: Our Veterans: Winners, Losers, Friends and Enemies on the New Terrain of Veterans Affairs by Gordon, Suzanne, Steve Early and Jasper Craven Opening the Ballot Box: Examining the Union Voting Behavior of Scholarship Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1