Halving nitrogen waste in the European Union food systems requires both dietary shifts and farm level actions

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100648
Adrian Leip , Carla Caldeira , Sara Corrado , Nicholas J. Hutchings , Jan Peter Lesschen , Martijn Schaap , Wim de Vries , Henk Westhoek , Hans JM. van Grinsven
{"title":"Halving nitrogen waste in the European Union food systems requires both dietary shifts and farm level actions","authors":"Adrian Leip ,&nbsp;Carla Caldeira ,&nbsp;Sara Corrado ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Hutchings ,&nbsp;Jan Peter Lesschen ,&nbsp;Martijn Schaap ,&nbsp;Wim de Vries ,&nbsp;Henk Westhoek ,&nbsp;Hans JM. van Grinsven","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The pivotal role of nitrogen to achieve environmental sustainable development goals and transform our food system is recognized in an ambitious nitrogen waste reduction target in the Farm to Fork Strategy of the European Commission. But is this a realistic objective and if so, what are the pathways that lead to success? To answer these questions, we first established, as a baseline, an updated food system nitrogen budget for the EU for the year 2015. The EU used 20 Tg of virgin (new) N to deliver 2.5 Tg N in food and 1.2 Tg N in fibres to consumers, yielding a food-system nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of 18%. We then built a simple model to combine intervention options that (a) increase farm level nitrogen use efficiencies, (b) reduce food waste increase recycling of waste and improve waste treatment, or (c) achieve a dietary shift towards healthier dietary patterns. The largest potential to increase N efficiency of the current agro-food system was found to lie in the livestock sector. From 144 possible combinations of intervention options analysed, we found that 12 combinations of interventions would reduce nitrogen losses by about 50%, 11 involving diet change. We further carried out an assessment of the societal appreciation of combinations of interventions considering private and public costs of the intervention measures, public benefit through effects on health and increased biodiversity of ecosystems, and public costs for overcoming socio-cultural barriers. Results show that a combination of moderate intervention options achieve halving of N losses at lowest societal costs. We conclude that systemic approaches are paramount to achieve deep nitrogen reduction targets and diet change appears to be an essential condition for success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000384/pdfft?md5=7b89030cab084c79d198a4370c3c6742&pid=1-s2.0-S2211912422000384-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The pivotal role of nitrogen to achieve environmental sustainable development goals and transform our food system is recognized in an ambitious nitrogen waste reduction target in the Farm to Fork Strategy of the European Commission. But is this a realistic objective and if so, what are the pathways that lead to success? To answer these questions, we first established, as a baseline, an updated food system nitrogen budget for the EU for the year 2015. The EU used 20 Tg of virgin (new) N to deliver 2.5 Tg N in food and 1.2 Tg N in fibres to consumers, yielding a food-system nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of 18%. We then built a simple model to combine intervention options that (a) increase farm level nitrogen use efficiencies, (b) reduce food waste increase recycling of waste and improve waste treatment, or (c) achieve a dietary shift towards healthier dietary patterns. The largest potential to increase N efficiency of the current agro-food system was found to lie in the livestock sector. From 144 possible combinations of intervention options analysed, we found that 12 combinations of interventions would reduce nitrogen losses by about 50%, 11 involving diet change. We further carried out an assessment of the societal appreciation of combinations of interventions considering private and public costs of the intervention measures, public benefit through effects on health and increased biodiversity of ecosystems, and public costs for overcoming socio-cultural barriers. Results show that a combination of moderate intervention options achieve halving of N losses at lowest societal costs. We conclude that systemic approaches are paramount to achieve deep nitrogen reduction targets and diet change appears to be an essential condition for success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要将欧盟粮食系统中的氮废物减少一半,既需要改变饮食习惯,也需要农场层面的行动
欧盟委员会“从农场到餐桌”战略中雄心勃勃的氮废物减少目标认识到氮在实现环境可持续发展目标和改变我们的粮食系统方面的关键作用。但这是一个现实的目标吗?如果是,通向成功的途径是什么?为了回答这些问题,我们首先建立了欧盟2015年最新的粮食系统氮预算作为基准。欧盟使用20 Tg的原生(新)氮向消费者提供食物中的2.5 Tg氮和纤维中的1.2 Tg氮,使食品系统氮利用效率(NUE)达到18%。然后,我们建立了一个简单的模型,将干预方案结合起来(a)提高农场氮的使用效率,(b)减少食物浪费,增加废物的回收利用并改善废物处理,或(c)实现饮食向更健康的饮食模式转变。研究发现,提高当前农业粮食系统氮素利用率的最大潜力在于畜牧业。从分析的144种可能的干预方案组合中,我们发现12种干预组合将减少约50%的氮损失,其中11种涉及饮食改变。我们进一步评估了社会对干预措施组合的评价,考虑了干预措施的私人和公共成本、对健康和增加生态系统生物多样性的影响带来的公共利益,以及克服社会文化障碍的公共成本。结果表明,适度干预方案的组合可以以最低的社会成本将氮损失减少一半。我们的结论是,系统方法对于实现深层氮减少目标至关重要,饮食改变似乎是成功的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the power of green leafy vegetables: Cultivating diversity for health, environmental benefits, and sustainability Do diverse crops or diverse market purchases matter more for women's diet quality in farm households of Mali? How to monitor the ‘success’ of agricultural sustainability: A perspective Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1