A New Dawn: The Supreme Court Upholds Religious Liberty in Education

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541
C. Russo, William E. Thro
{"title":"A New Dawn: The Supreme Court Upholds Religious Liberty in Education","authors":"C. Russo, William E. Thro","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Near the end of its 2021–2022 term the Supreme Court ushered in a new dawn by upholding religious freedom in educational environments in two different types of disputes with far-reaching implications. In light of the Supreme Court decisions in Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, this article reflects on their significance, the most important point of which is the latter’s having invalidated its longstanding measure for reviewing disputes under the First Amendment, the tripartite Lemon v. Kurtzman test as well as the endorsement test it enunciated in Lynch v. Donnelly for public schools.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Near the end of its 2021–2022 term the Supreme Court ushered in a new dawn by upholding religious freedom in educational environments in two different types of disputes with far-reaching implications. In light of the Supreme Court decisions in Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, this article reflects on their significance, the most important point of which is the latter’s having invalidated its longstanding measure for reviewing disputes under the First Amendment, the tripartite Lemon v. Kurtzman test as well as the endorsement test it enunciated in Lynch v. Donnelly for public schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的黎明:最高法院维护教育中的宗教自由
摘要在2021-2022年任期即将结束之际,最高法院在两种具有深远影响的不同类型的纠纷中维护了教育环境中的宗教自由,从而迎来了新的曙光。根据最高法院在Carson诉Makin和Kennedy诉Bremerton学区案中的裁决,本文反思了它们的重要性,其中最重要的一点是后者宣布其根据第一修正案审查争议的长期措施无效,Lemon诉Kurtzman三方测试以及其在Lynch诉。唐纳利为公立学校服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1