Theater History in 3D: The Digital Early Modern in the Age of the Interface

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1086/706213
G. Bloom
{"title":"Theater History in 3D: The Digital Early Modern in the Age of the Interface","authors":"G. Bloom","doi":"10.1086/706213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n her essay for the twenty-fifth anniversary special issue of English Literary Renaissance (1995), Leah Marcus took the risk I take in my contribution to this fiftieth anniversary issue: writing about how early modern studies has been transformed by and has in turn impacted the computer age. The topic is tricky because digital technology changes so rapidly, quickly dating or disproving the kind of speculative or visionary claims that the anniversary essay genre expects. For instance, Marcus’ 1995 essay remarked on the conversion of literary and critical texts into CD-ROM format, a format that turned out to be so short-lived that many of today’s students have never even heard of it, let alone considered using it for their digital scholarly projects. The essay also conjectured that scholars would be “slow to surrender the familiar tactile and visual elements of book reading to the very different demands of the computer” (396), which “cannot be held comfortably in the hand” (397). Who could have anticipated that about 15 years later, Apple would release the iPad, the hand-held device on which I readMarcus’ essay recently, using my Apple “pencil” to make notes on the screen in just the way I would have were I reading a printed version of her text. The experience of reading computer-generated texts today has come closer to the experience of reading printed texts than anyone could have suspected it would become twenty-five years ago. Marcus hardly could have known what was around the corner in 1995, but the value of her essay is that its primary focus is not prognostication about technological unknowns. Instead, it takes stock of how changes in digital technology were intersecting in the mid-nineties with more traditional areas of scholarly inquiry, explaining why early modernists were","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/706213","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

I n her essay for the twenty-fifth anniversary special issue of English Literary Renaissance (1995), Leah Marcus took the risk I take in my contribution to this fiftieth anniversary issue: writing about how early modern studies has been transformed by and has in turn impacted the computer age. The topic is tricky because digital technology changes so rapidly, quickly dating or disproving the kind of speculative or visionary claims that the anniversary essay genre expects. For instance, Marcus’ 1995 essay remarked on the conversion of literary and critical texts into CD-ROM format, a format that turned out to be so short-lived that many of today’s students have never even heard of it, let alone considered using it for their digital scholarly projects. The essay also conjectured that scholars would be “slow to surrender the familiar tactile and visual elements of book reading to the very different demands of the computer” (396), which “cannot be held comfortably in the hand” (397). Who could have anticipated that about 15 years later, Apple would release the iPad, the hand-held device on which I readMarcus’ essay recently, using my Apple “pencil” to make notes on the screen in just the way I would have were I reading a printed version of her text. The experience of reading computer-generated texts today has come closer to the experience of reading printed texts than anyone could have suspected it would become twenty-five years ago. Marcus hardly could have known what was around the corner in 1995, but the value of her essay is that its primary focus is not prognostication about technological unknowns. Instead, it takes stock of how changes in digital technology were intersecting in the mid-nineties with more traditional areas of scholarly inquiry, explaining why early modernists were
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D剧场史:界面时代的数字早期现代
Leah Marcus在她为《英国文学复兴》(1995)二十五周年特刊撰写的文章中,冒着我为五十周年特刊所做贡献的风险:写早期现代研究如何被计算机时代所改变,并反过来影响了计算机时代。这个话题很棘手,因为数字技术变化如此之快,很快就过时了,或者反驳了周年纪念文章类型所期望的那种推测性或前瞻性的说法。例如,Marcus 1995年的文章评论了将文学和评论文本转换为CD-ROM格式,这种格式非常短暂,以至于今天的许多学生甚至从未听说过,更不用说考虑将其用于数字学术项目了。这篇文章还推测,学者们会“慢慢地将书籍阅读中熟悉的触觉和视觉元素屈服于电脑的不同需求”(396),而电脑“无法舒适地握在手中”(397)。谁能想到,大约15年后,苹果公司会发布iPad,这是我最近阅读马库斯文章的手持设备,我用苹果“铅笔”在屏幕上做笔记,就像我阅读她的文本打印版一样。今天阅读计算机生成文本的体验比25年前任何人都能想象的更接近阅读印刷文本的体验。Marcus很难知道1995年会发生什么,但她的文章的价值在于,它的主要关注点不是对技术未知的预测。相反,它评估了数字技术的变化在90年代中期是如何与更传统的学术研究领域交叉的,解释了为什么早期的现代主义者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1