Applying a Multiple Comparison Control to IRT Item-fit Testing

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2020.1789138
D. Sauder, Christine E. DeMars
{"title":"Applying a Multiple Comparison Control to IRT Item-fit Testing","authors":"D. Sauder, Christine E. DeMars","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2020.1789138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We used simulation techniques to assess the item-level and familywise Type I error control and power of an IRT item-fit statistic, the S-X2 . Previous research indicated that the S-X2 has good Type I error control and decent power, but no previous research examined familywise Type I error control. We varied percentage of misfitting items, sample size, and test length, and computed familywise Type I error with no correction, a Bonferroni correction, and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction. The S-X2 controlled item-level and familywise Type I errors when corrections were applied to conditions with no misfitting items. In the presence of misfitting items, the S-X2 exhibited inflated item-level and familywise false hit rates in many conditions, even with familywise Type I error corrections. Lastly, power was low and negatively impacted when either of the familywise Type I error corrections was applied. We suggest using the S-X2 with no familywise Type I error control in conjunction with other methods of assessing item fit (e.g., visual analysis).","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"362 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08957347.2020.1789138","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1789138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT We used simulation techniques to assess the item-level and familywise Type I error control and power of an IRT item-fit statistic, the S-X2 . Previous research indicated that the S-X2 has good Type I error control and decent power, but no previous research examined familywise Type I error control. We varied percentage of misfitting items, sample size, and test length, and computed familywise Type I error with no correction, a Bonferroni correction, and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction. The S-X2 controlled item-level and familywise Type I errors when corrections were applied to conditions with no misfitting items. In the presence of misfitting items, the S-X2 exhibited inflated item-level and familywise false hit rates in many conditions, even with familywise Type I error corrections. Lastly, power was low and negatively impacted when either of the familywise Type I error corrections was applied. We suggest using the S-X2 with no familywise Type I error control in conjunction with other methods of assessing item fit (e.g., visual analysis).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重比较控制在IRT项目拟合测试中的应用
摘要:我们使用模拟技术来评估IRT项目拟合统计量S-X2的项目级别和家庭I型误差控制和能力。先前的研究表明S-X2具有良好的I型误差控制和良好的功率,但先前没有研究对家庭I型误差进行检验。我们改变了不匹配项目的百分比、样本量和测试长度,并计算了无校正、Bonferroni校正和Benjamini Hochberg校正的家族I型误差。S-X2控制的项目级别和在没有不匹配项目的情况下进行校正时的系列I型错误。在存在不匹配项目的情况下,S-X2在许多情况下表现出夸大的项目水平和家庭错误命中率,即使有家庭I型错误校正。最后,当应用任何一种家庭I型纠错时,功率较低并受到负面影响。我们建议将S-X2与其他评估项目匹配度的方法(如视觉分析)结合使用,而不进行家族I型误差控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1