Andalusi Populations at La Dehesilla Cave (Sierra de Cádiz, Southern Iberia): An Interdisciplinary Approach to their Rural Economic Systems

IF 0.7 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Islamic Archaeology Pub Date : 2019-01-14 DOI:10.1558/JIA.36443
Daniel García-Rivero, Ruth Taylor, Luis G. Pérez-Aguilar, Guillem Pérez-Jordà, Esteban García-Viñas, J. López‐Sáez, D. Zurro, L. Peña-Chocarro, Eloísa Bernáldez-Sánchez
{"title":"Andalusi Populations at La Dehesilla Cave (Sierra de Cádiz, Southern Iberia): An Interdisciplinary Approach to their Rural Economic Systems","authors":"Daniel García-Rivero, Ruth Taylor, Luis G. Pérez-Aguilar, Guillem Pérez-Jordà, Esteban García-Viñas, J. López‐Sáez, D. Zurro, L. Peña-Chocarro, Eloísa Bernáldez-Sánchez","doi":"10.1558/JIA.36443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few studies have dealt with the occupation of caves during the Andalusi period in Southern Iberia. This may be explained by the attention placed traditionally on the trinomial mudun (cities), ?us?n (fortresses) and qura (farmsteads), in which other forms of rural occupation have been generally overlooked. In this paper we explore the sequence at La Dehesilla Cave –based on the analysis of animal skeleton remains, pollen, seeds and fruits, and phytoliths- with the aim to define the economic systems of its Andalusi inhabitants. Because the sequence displays two different occupation phases, the first during the Taifa Period in the second half of the 11th century and the second during the Almohad Period in the second half of the 12th century, this study characterises the ecological and economic systems of the two periods and highlights the differences between them. The data suggest that the economy of both periods was mainly based on livestock, and especially on sheep herds. Nevertheless, the comparison between them enables us to observe a few significant differences that indicate dissimilar behavioural and economic patterns. Plant macro-remains show a larger amount of cereals and leguminous seeds, as well as of domestic fruits, in the Taifa Period than in the Almohad Period. The zoological record displays clear differences between the two periods. The Taifa Period shows a greater proportion of herds while the input from hunting increased in the Almohad Period. Also, there are proportionally opposite patterns in the age of sacrifice of sheep. The earlier period may correspond to a more sedentary herding and partly farming population, while the second period to a mainly herding, perhaps mobile, population. These results are discussed within the political dynamics of the historical framework of the surrounding territory, and contribute to the knowledge of the rural economic dynamics of the Andalusi period.","PeriodicalId":41225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JIA.36443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Few studies have dealt with the occupation of caves during the Andalusi period in Southern Iberia. This may be explained by the attention placed traditionally on the trinomial mudun (cities), ?us?n (fortresses) and qura (farmsteads), in which other forms of rural occupation have been generally overlooked. In this paper we explore the sequence at La Dehesilla Cave –based on the analysis of animal skeleton remains, pollen, seeds and fruits, and phytoliths- with the aim to define the economic systems of its Andalusi inhabitants. Because the sequence displays two different occupation phases, the first during the Taifa Period in the second half of the 11th century and the second during the Almohad Period in the second half of the 12th century, this study characterises the ecological and economic systems of the two periods and highlights the differences between them. The data suggest that the economy of both periods was mainly based on livestock, and especially on sheep herds. Nevertheless, the comparison between them enables us to observe a few significant differences that indicate dissimilar behavioural and economic patterns. Plant macro-remains show a larger amount of cereals and leguminous seeds, as well as of domestic fruits, in the Taifa Period than in the Almohad Period. The zoological record displays clear differences between the two periods. The Taifa Period shows a greater proportion of herds while the input from hunting increased in the Almohad Period. Also, there are proportionally opposite patterns in the age of sacrifice of sheep. The earlier period may correspond to a more sedentary herding and partly farming population, while the second period to a mainly herding, perhaps mobile, population. These results are discussed within the political dynamics of the historical framework of the surrounding territory, and contribute to the knowledge of the rural economic dynamics of the Andalusi period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La Dehesilla洞穴(塞拉利昂,伊比利亚南部)的安达卢西亚人口:对其农村经济系统的跨学科方法
很少有研究涉及伊比利亚南部安达卢西时期对洞穴的占领。这可以通过传统上对三项mudun(城市)的关注来解释?我们n(堡垒)和qura(农场),其中其他形式的农村占领通常被忽视。在本文中,我们根据对动物骨骼遗骸、花粉、种子和果实以及植石的分析,探索了La Dehesilla洞穴的序列,目的是确定其安达卢西亚居民的经济系统。由于该序列显示了两个不同的占领阶段,第一个阶段是11世纪下半叶的太法时期,第二个阶段是12世纪下半叶的阿尔莫哈德时期,因此本研究对这两个时期的生态和经济系统进行了表征,并强调了它们之间的差异。数据表明,这两个时期的经济主要以牲畜为基础,尤其是以羊群为基础。然而,它们之间的比较使我们能够观察到一些显著的差异,这些差异表明不同的行为和经济模式。植物宏观遗迹显示,太发时期的谷物和豆科种子以及国内水果的数量比杏仁时期更多。动物学记录显示了这两个时期之间的明显差异。太法时期的畜群比例更高,而阿尔莫哈德时期的狩猎投入增加。此外,在绵羊献祭的年龄上也存在着比例相反的模式。早期可能对应于更为定居的放牧和部分务农的人口,而第二阶段则对应于主要放牧,可能是流动的人口。这些结果在周边地区历史框架的政治动态中进行了讨论,并有助于了解安达卢西时期的农村经济动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Islamic Archaeology is the only journal today devoted to the field of Islamic archaeology on a global scale. In the context of this journal, “Islamic archaeology” refers neither to a specific time period, nor to a particular geographical region, as Islam is global and the center of the “Islamic world” has shifted many times over the centuries. Likewise, it is not defined by a single methodology or theoretical construct (for example; it is not the “Islamic” equivalent of “Biblical archaeology”, with an emphasis on the study of places and peoples mentioned in religious texts). The term refers to the archaeological study of Islamic societies, polities, and communities, wherever they are found. It may be considered a type of “historical” archaeology, in which the study of historically (textually) known societies can be studied through a combination of “texts and tell”.
期刊最新文献
The “Halep Arki” (Aleppo Channel), a Mamluk Era Water System for Aleppo Imported Table Wares in the Palestinian Countryside in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries and Their Integration into (and Influence on?) Local Dining Habits Artifacts Associated with the Chemical Arts in the Early Islamic Period in Ramla, Israel 'Imagining Antiquity in Islamic Societies' Stephennie Mulder (ed) (2022) 'The Continuity of Pre-Islamic Motifs in Javanese Mosque Ornamentation, Indonesia' Hee Sook Lee-Niinioja (2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1