The impact of the COVID-19 enforced lockdown and fiscal package on the South African economy and environment: a preliminary analysis

IF 2.2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Environment and Development Economics Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.1017/S1355770X21000243
M. Chitiga‐Mabugu, M. Henseler, R. Mabugu, H. Maisonnave
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 enforced lockdown and fiscal package on the South African economy and environment: a preliminary analysis","authors":"M. Chitiga‐Mabugu, M. Henseler, R. Mabugu, H. Maisonnave","doi":"10.1017/S1355770X21000243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper offers a quantitative assessment of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic-induced lockdown and government fiscal plan, containing ‘green’ elements on the economy and the environment of South Africa. The analysis uses a dynamic computable general equilibrium model operationalised using a social accounting matrix coupled with a greenhouse gas balance and emissions data. We find that while the economy is harshly impacted by the pandemic in the short term, the government fiscal package ameliorates and cushions the negative effects on poor households. Importantly, an adaptation of the fiscal package towards a ‘greener’ policy achieves the same economic outcome and reduces unemployment. Carbon dioxide emissions decrease in the short run due to economic slowdown. This improvement persists until 2030. These results can be used as decision support for policy makers on how to orient the post COVID-19 policies to be pro-poor and pro-environment, and thus, ‘build back better and fairer’.","PeriodicalId":47751,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Development Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X21000243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This paper offers a quantitative assessment of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic-induced lockdown and government fiscal plan, containing ‘green’ elements on the economy and the environment of South Africa. The analysis uses a dynamic computable general equilibrium model operationalised using a social accounting matrix coupled with a greenhouse gas balance and emissions data. We find that while the economy is harshly impacted by the pandemic in the short term, the government fiscal package ameliorates and cushions the negative effects on poor households. Importantly, an adaptation of the fiscal package towards a ‘greener’ policy achieves the same economic outcome and reduces unemployment. Carbon dioxide emissions decrease in the short run due to economic slowdown. This improvement persists until 2030. These results can be used as decision support for policy makers on how to orient the post COVID-19 policies to be pro-poor and pro-environment, and thus, ‘build back better and fairer’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎强制封锁和财政一揽子计划对南非经济和环境的影响:初步分析
摘要本文对新冠肺炎疫情引发的封锁和政府财政计划的影响进行了定量评估,其中包含“绿色”元素对南非经济和环境的影响。该分析使用了一个动态可计算的一般均衡模型,该模型使用社会核算矩阵与温室气体平衡和排放数据相结合进行操作。我们发现,尽管经济在短期内受到疫情的严重影响,但政府的财政方案改善并缓解了对贫困家庭的负面影响。重要的是,将财政方案调整为“更环保”的政策可以实现同样的经济结果,并降低失业率。由于经济放缓,二氧化碳排放量在短期内减少。这种改善将持续到2030年。这些结果可以作为决策者如何将新冠肺炎后政策定位为有利于环境和有利于环境的决策支持,从而“重建得更好、更公平”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Environment and Development Economics is positioned at the intersection of environmental, resource and development economics. The Editor and Associate Editors, supported by a distinguished panel of advisors from around the world, aim to encourage submissions from researchers in the field in both developed and developing countries. The Journal is divided into two main sections, Theory and Applications, which includes regular academic papers and Policy Options, which includes papers that may be of interest to the wider policy community. Environment and Development Economics also publishes occasional Policy Fora (discussions based on a focal paper). From time to time the journal publishes special issues based on a particular theme.
期刊最新文献
What determines respondents’ valuation uncertainty? Impact of subjective perceptions from the demand and supply sides The impact of water quality on children's education: evidence from 39 districts in the Ganges Basin of India Trade liberalization and the choice of pollution abatement Effect of foreign direct investment on firms' pollution intensity: evidence from a natural experiment in China Institutions' quality and environmental pollution in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1