{"title":"Status Hukum Perjanjian Beli Kembali (Buy-Back Guarantee) yang Diberikan oleh Developer Pailit kepada Bank","authors":"Hesti Ning Tyas, Sukarmi Sukarmi, Patricia Audrey","doi":"10.17977/um019v7i2p438-446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the contract disputes in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1013K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016 and the legal status of the buy-back guarantee agreement obtained from the bankrupt developer. This study used a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The contract dispute in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1013K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016 related to submitting several claims based on the buy-back guarantee agreement between PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. as a creditor with PT. Rizky Jaya Sentosa Ladang was the developer who was declared bankrupt when the debtor defaulted. The legal status of the buy-back guarantee agreement obtained by the bank from the bankrupt developer remained binding on the parties who have agreed. The contents of the buy-back guarantee agreement remained valid as law for the parties because one of the bankrupt parties was not included in the conditions for the termination of engagements and agreements.","PeriodicalId":31344,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v7i2p438-446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study analyzed the contract disputes in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1013K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016 and the legal status of the buy-back guarantee agreement obtained from the bankrupt developer. This study used a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The contract dispute in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1013K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016 related to submitting several claims based on the buy-back guarantee agreement between PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. as a creditor with PT. Rizky Jaya Sentosa Ladang was the developer who was declared bankrupt when the debtor defaulted. The legal status of the buy-back guarantee agreement obtained by the bank from the bankrupt developer remained binding on the parties who have agreed. The contents of the buy-back guarantee agreement remained valid as law for the parties because one of the bankrupt parties was not included in the conditions for the termination of engagements and agreements.