laser vs optical urethrotomy for urethral stricture

mahmood shakir abdulkarim karbalaie
{"title":"laser vs optical urethrotomy for urethral stricture","authors":"mahmood shakir abdulkarim karbalaie","doi":"10.33762/bsurg.2021.131829.1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is to compare the two options of treating urethral stricture; the cold knife and the LASER. The prospective study conducted in the Department of urology of Basrah Teaching Hospital. Patients were divided in two groups, all patients had urethral strictures one group treated with optical urethrotomy and the second group treated with laser urethrotomy. Patients were evaluated both pre and post operatively for flow rate and for symptoms and complications. The number of patients studied was 30, divided in to 15 in each group (cold knife and laser). The mean peak flow rate in laser group was (12.9 ml/min), and the cold knife group was (15.4 ml/min) after 14 days post operatively. Both cold knife and laser urethrotomy improves the peak flow rate significantly two weeks after surgery but the improvement was more noticed in the cold knife group. Bleeding was more (against our expectations), while infection was less, and the operative time was more in the laser group. In conclusion, the cold knife treatment for urethal stricture is more effective with less complications than laser treatment.","PeriodicalId":52765,"journal":{"name":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33762/bsurg.2021.131829.1013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is to compare the two options of treating urethral stricture; the cold knife and the LASER. The prospective study conducted in the Department of urology of Basrah Teaching Hospital. Patients were divided in two groups, all patients had urethral strictures one group treated with optical urethrotomy and the second group treated with laser urethrotomy. Patients were evaluated both pre and post operatively for flow rate and for symptoms and complications. The number of patients studied was 30, divided in to 15 in each group (cold knife and laser). The mean peak flow rate in laser group was (12.9 ml/min), and the cold knife group was (15.4 ml/min) after 14 days post operatively. Both cold knife and laser urethrotomy improves the peak flow rate significantly two weeks after surgery but the improvement was more noticed in the cold knife group. Bleeding was more (against our expectations), while infection was less, and the operative time was more in the laser group. In conclusion, the cold knife treatment for urethal stricture is more effective with less complications than laser treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光与光学尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄
本研究比较两种治疗尿道狭窄的方法;冷刀和激光。这项前瞻性研究在巴士拉教学医院泌尿外科进行。患者被分为两组,所有患者都有尿道狭窄,一组接受光学尿道切开术,第二组接受激光尿道切开术。术前和术后对患者的流速、症状和并发症进行评估。研究的患者人数为30人,每组分为15人(冷刀和激光)。术后14天,激光组的平均峰值流速为(12.9ml/min),冷刀组为(15.4ml/min)。冷刀和激光尿道切开术均能显著改善术后两周的峰值流速,但冷刀组的改善更为明显。激光组出血更多(与我们的预期相反),而感染更少,手术时间更长。总之,冷刀治疗输尿管狭窄比激光治疗更有效,并发症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Thyroid Functions in Females with Anal Diseases Management of diabetic foot in Al-Hussein teaching hospital / Samawa The long term evaluation of the sexual and voiding functions in adolescents with the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias at childhood PREDICTORS OF EARLY AND DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION IN LIVE AND CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION Early rare recurrence of a huge renal solitary fibrous tumor: Case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1