{"title":"Oscar Wilde’s Misattributions: A Legacy of Gross Indecency","authors":"Katerina García-Walsh","doi":"10.46911/pyiv5690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on correspondence and periodical advertising as well as paratextual and bibliographic detail, this paper compares editions of the three most prominent texts falsely associated with Oscar Wilde: The Green Carnation (1894), an intimate satire on Wilde’s relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas actually written by Douglas’ friend Robert Smythe Hichens; “The Priest and the Acolyte” (1894), a paedophilic story written by John Francis Bloxam and presented as evidence against Wilde during his libel trial and then privately reprinted; and the erotic novel Teleny (1893), which is still attributed to Wilde today. His name appeared in tandem with these novels over the course of a century, linking him further with sex and scandal. Two separate editions of Teleny in 1984 and 1986 feature introductions by Winston Leyland and John McRae, respectively justifying Wilde’s authorship and describing the work as likely a round-robin pornographic collaboration between Wilde and his young friends. By recognising and exposing these cases of literary impersonation, we can amend Wilde’s legacy.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/pyiv5690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drawing on correspondence and periodical advertising as well as paratextual and bibliographic detail, this paper compares editions of the three most prominent texts falsely associated with Oscar Wilde: The Green Carnation (1894), an intimate satire on Wilde’s relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas actually written by Douglas’ friend Robert Smythe Hichens; “The Priest and the Acolyte” (1894), a paedophilic story written by John Francis Bloxam and presented as evidence against Wilde during his libel trial and then privately reprinted; and the erotic novel Teleny (1893), which is still attributed to Wilde today. His name appeared in tandem with these novels over the course of a century, linking him further with sex and scandal. Two separate editions of Teleny in 1984 and 1986 feature introductions by Winston Leyland and John McRae, respectively justifying Wilde’s authorship and describing the work as likely a round-robin pornographic collaboration between Wilde and his young friends. By recognising and exposing these cases of literary impersonation, we can amend Wilde’s legacy.
本文利用通信和期刊广告以及文本和书目细节,比较了与奥斯卡·王尔德有关的三个最著名的文本的版本:《绿色康乃馨》(1894),这是一部关于王尔德与阿尔弗雷德·道格拉斯勋爵关系的亲密讽刺作品,实际上是道格拉斯的朋友罗伯特·斯迈斯·希金斯写的;《牧师和助手》(The Priest and The Acolyte, 1894)是约翰·弗朗西斯·布洛克森(John Francis Bloxam)写的一个恋童癖故事,在王尔德的诽谤罪审判中被作为指控他的证据,后来被私下转载;以及情色小说《Teleny》(1893),至今仍被认为是王尔德的作品。在一个世纪的时间里,他的名字与这些小说一起出现,进一步将他与性和丑闻联系在一起。1984年和1986年出版的两个版本分别由温斯顿·莱兰和约翰·麦克雷介绍,分别为王尔德的作者身份辩护,并将这部作品描述为王尔德和他的年轻朋友之间的轮番色情合作。通过认识和揭露这些文学模仿的案例,我们可以修正王尔德的遗产。