New Forms of Fascism

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.8
R. T. Pada
{"title":"New Forms of Fascism","authors":"R. T. Pada","doi":"10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper covers the idea of fascism in the light of new and emerging technologies as well as the current ubiquity of its use. I draw my inspiration for this paper from the constant use of the word \"fascist\" to denote opposition to a group or personal stance on socio-political issues. My attempt to look at new forms of fascism is guided by the original concept of fascism espoused by Mussolini's Doctrine of Fascism. I also attempt to frame the conditions of the new forms of fascism in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This context undergirds the current propaganda model of media institutions that have shifted their operations to the Internet. I argue in this paper that current media platforms that operate under the BUMMER principle provide a potent breeding pool for new forms of fascism that are reliant on ideologies as opposed to authoritarian figures. These conditions, as I argue in this paper, force us to rethink our current entanglement with democratic systems that are entrenched in representative iterations. As a conclusion to this paper, I argue the strong need for exploring an increased degree of participation of individuals through direct forms of democracy, increased scrutiny of media institutions, and the exploration of current and existing technologies to undergird direct democratic participation.","PeriodicalId":40692,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.24.2.a.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper covers the idea of fascism in the light of new and emerging technologies as well as the current ubiquity of its use. I draw my inspiration for this paper from the constant use of the word "fascist" to denote opposition to a group or personal stance on socio-political issues. My attempt to look at new forms of fascism is guided by the original concept of fascism espoused by Mussolini's Doctrine of Fascism. I also attempt to frame the conditions of the new forms of fascism in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This context undergirds the current propaganda model of media institutions that have shifted their operations to the Internet. I argue in this paper that current media platforms that operate under the BUMMER principle provide a potent breeding pool for new forms of fascism that are reliant on ideologies as opposed to authoritarian figures. These conditions, as I argue in this paper, force us to rethink our current entanglement with democratic systems that are entrenched in representative iterations. As a conclusion to this paper, I argue the strong need for exploring an increased degree of participation of individuals through direct forms of democracy, increased scrutiny of media institutions, and the exploration of current and existing technologies to undergird direct democratic participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新形式的法西斯主义
本文从新技术和新兴技术的角度介绍了法西斯主义的概念,以及目前法西斯主义普遍使用的情况。我写这篇论文的灵感来源于不断使用“法西斯”一词来表示在社会政治问题上反对一个团体或个人立场。我试图观察新形式的法西斯主义,其指导思想是墨索里尼的法西斯学说所倡导的法西斯派的原始概念。我还试图将新形式的法西斯主义的条件置于第四次工业革命的背景下。这种背景支撑了目前媒体机构将业务转移到互联网上的宣传模式。我在这篇论文中认为,目前在BUMMER原则下运作的媒体平台为新形式的法西斯主义提供了一个强大的滋生库,这些法西斯主义依赖于意识形态而不是威权人物。正如我在本文中所说,这些条件迫使我们重新思考我们目前与民主制度的纠缠,这些制度在代表性的迭代中根深蒂固。作为本文的结论,我认为,迫切需要通过直接的民主形式,加强对媒体机构的审查,以及探索当前和现有的技术来加强个人的参与,以支持直接的民主参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Discounting Utility Without Complaints: Avoiding the Demandingness of Classical Utilitarianism The Assemble of Olympism and Nationalism: Social Philosophical Analysis of Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games as Case Study Distinguishing Models of Kierkegaard’s Indirect Communication: Toward a Clearer View of a Multivalent Discourse Technique Ubuntu as an Ethical Framework in Business Ethics for African Socio-Economic Development Spinoza: Desire and Supreme Good, from Philosophizing to Wise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1