Social and Legal Prerequisites for Protecting the Property Interests of the Suspect and the Accused in the Application of Coercive Measures

T. T. Bayazitov
{"title":"Social and Legal Prerequisites for Protecting the Property Interests of the Suspect and the Accused in the Application of Coercive Measures","authors":"T. T. Bayazitov","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-2-189-202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern development of social relations cannot be considered in isolation from the economic basis of human life. Taking into account the consistent formation of the institution of private property and the property sphere, new rules for the relationship between the state and the individual are being formed. On this background, issues related to the implementation of the repressive function of the state are of great importance. The process of investigating criminal activity often affects the property interests of the participants in the criminal process. At the same time, the rules of this type of state activity enshrined in the legislation do not always take into account the changed format of economic relations between individuals and legal entities. The article deals with the problem of the lack of adaptation of the criminal procedural legislation to the actual relations in the area of public life. Questions of interaction between criminal procedure and civil legislation are described here. There is a lack of an integrated approach to regulating the issues of protecting the property interests of the suspect, the accused in the application of measures of procedural coercion. Despite the general approach in this area of relations formulated in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which is favorable for the suspect and for the accused, there are multiple contradictions at the level of intersectoral regulation. The paper states the need for a comprehensive regulation of the features of the application of coercive measures of a property nature to the specified participants in the criminal process. Judicial practice contributes to this process. The decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation studied in the article forces the legislator to new reforms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Some of the programmatic political statements of the country's top leadership noted in the work contributes this process. The analysis of the scientific problem under study is carried out taking into account the existing norms of international law, as well as on the basis of the formed historical experience of the domestic procedure for regulating the rules of investigation and trial in criminal cases. The study focuses on the application of such measures of property impact on a person as bail, custody, seizure of property and others. The conclusions are made taking into account statistical indicators and the results of a survey of practical employees of the investigative departments of various departments and the lawyer corps.","PeriodicalId":33294,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-2-189-202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern development of social relations cannot be considered in isolation from the economic basis of human life. Taking into account the consistent formation of the institution of private property and the property sphere, new rules for the relationship between the state and the individual are being formed. On this background, issues related to the implementation of the repressive function of the state are of great importance. The process of investigating criminal activity often affects the property interests of the participants in the criminal process. At the same time, the rules of this type of state activity enshrined in the legislation do not always take into account the changed format of economic relations between individuals and legal entities. The article deals with the problem of the lack of adaptation of the criminal procedural legislation to the actual relations in the area of public life. Questions of interaction between criminal procedure and civil legislation are described here. There is a lack of an integrated approach to regulating the issues of protecting the property interests of the suspect, the accused in the application of measures of procedural coercion. Despite the general approach in this area of relations formulated in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which is favorable for the suspect and for the accused, there are multiple contradictions at the level of intersectoral regulation. The paper states the need for a comprehensive regulation of the features of the application of coercive measures of a property nature to the specified participants in the criminal process. Judicial practice contributes to this process. The decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation studied in the article forces the legislator to new reforms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Some of the programmatic political statements of the country's top leadership noted in the work contributes this process. The analysis of the scientific problem under study is carried out taking into account the existing norms of international law, as well as on the basis of the formed historical experience of the domestic procedure for regulating the rules of investigation and trial in criminal cases. The study focuses on the application of such measures of property impact on a person as bail, custody, seizure of property and others. The conclusions are made taking into account statistical indicators and the results of a survey of practical employees of the investigative departments of various departments and the lawyer corps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制措施适用中保护犯罪嫌疑人和被告人财产利益的社会法律前提
社会关系的现代发展不能脱离人类生活的经济基础来看待。考虑到私人财产制度和财产领域的一致形成,国家与个人关系的新规则正在形成。在这种背景下,与国家镇压职能的实施有关的问题具有重要意义。调查犯罪活动的过程往往会影响犯罪过程参与者的财产利益。与此同时,立法中关于这类国家活动的规则并不总是考虑到个人和法律实体之间经济关系形式的变化。本文论述了刑事诉讼立法缺乏与公共生活领域实际关系相适应的问题。刑事诉讼与民事立法之间的相互作用问题在这里作了说明。在适用程序胁迫措施时,缺乏一种综合办法来规范保护嫌疑人和被告人财产利益的问题。尽管《俄罗斯联邦宪法》在这一关系领域制定了有利于嫌疑人和被告的一般做法,但在部门间监管层面存在多重矛盾。该文件指出,有必要对刑事诉讼中特定参与者适用财产性强制措施的特点作出全面规定。司法实践有助于这一进程。该条研究的俄罗斯联邦宪法法院的裁决迫使立法者对《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》进行新的改革。工作中提到的该国最高领导层的一些纲领性政治声明有助于这一进程。对所研究的科学问题的分析考虑到了现有的国际法准则,并以规范刑事案件调查和审判规则的国内程序的历史经验为基础。该研究的重点是保释、监护、扣押财产和其他财产措施对个人财产影响的适用。这些结论是根据统计指标和对各部门调查部门和律师团实际雇员的调查结果得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Administrative Discretion: Questions and Answers (Part 3) Some Features of the Criminal Procedural Status of a Witness On the Origins of Administrative and Judicial Discretion in Russian Administrative and Jurisdictional Activities The Legal Concept of “Source of Increased Danger” Exhaustion of Exclusive Rights to Computer Programs Under the Laws of Russia, the USA, the EU, China and India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1