Weighting National Survey Data in Bangladesh: Why, How and Which weight?

Ferdous Hakim, Rijwan Bhuiyan, Mst. Khaleda Akter, Md. Abdul Mohit, M. Alam, Md Rizwanul Karim, M. Zaman
{"title":"Weighting National Survey Data in Bangladesh: Why, How and Which weight?","authors":"Ferdous Hakim, Rijwan Bhuiyan, Mst. Khaleda Akter, Md. Abdul Mohit, M. Alam, Md Rizwanul Karim, M. Zaman","doi":"10.3329/bmrcb.v47i2.57769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Weighting of national survey data enables the sample to be more representative of the target population. Weighting procedure is a thorough exercise and yields several types of weights. However, considerable variation exists among authors on which weight to use leaving the researchers baffled. As a result, survey data are often used by researchers without the weights leading to erroneous conclusions. In addition, despite availability of powerful yet costly statistical software•• researchers from developing countries are mostly unable to use those due to high cost. In this article, we share our experience on weighting for recent national surveys in Bangladesh using Microsoft Excel.\nObjectives: Overall objective was to perform sample weighting of a national survey of Bangladesh using Excel. As specific objective, the study was aimed at creating different weighting variables, describe their features and identify the appropriate weight to be used for analysis.\nMethods: We generated four types of weights: the base weight calculated from probabilities of selection, and non-response adjusted, population calibration adjusted, and trimmed weights. We compared the distribution of the population by sex and age by unweighted and four types of weighted numbers. Finally, we calculated weighted means, medians, ranges, standard errors, confidence intervals, variances, multiplicative effects and design effects with these four weights. In addition, we compared the weighted prevalence of a key variable of the survey using these four weights.\nResults: We compared unweighted distribution with weighted ones and identified that weighting makes the sample distribution to conform to the target population. Among the four calculated weights, the trimmed weight had narrow standard error and variance, and smallest design and multiplicative effects. It yielded an acceptable prevalence and distribution of prevalence of mental disorder.\nConclusion: Among the four weights, we show that the trimmed weight met all parameters of good quality and precision. We performed this complex exercise using Microsoft Excel which is largely available to researchers in Bangladesh. Therefore, we recommend using the trimmed weight for national level surveys in Bangladesh in a similar context.\nBangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2021; 47(2): 118-126","PeriodicalId":8704,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v47i2.57769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Weighting of national survey data enables the sample to be more representative of the target population. Weighting procedure is a thorough exercise and yields several types of weights. However, considerable variation exists among authors on which weight to use leaving the researchers baffled. As a result, survey data are often used by researchers without the weights leading to erroneous conclusions. In addition, despite availability of powerful yet costly statistical software•• researchers from developing countries are mostly unable to use those due to high cost. In this article, we share our experience on weighting for recent national surveys in Bangladesh using Microsoft Excel. Objectives: Overall objective was to perform sample weighting of a national survey of Bangladesh using Excel. As specific objective, the study was aimed at creating different weighting variables, describe their features and identify the appropriate weight to be used for analysis. Methods: We generated four types of weights: the base weight calculated from probabilities of selection, and non-response adjusted, population calibration adjusted, and trimmed weights. We compared the distribution of the population by sex and age by unweighted and four types of weighted numbers. Finally, we calculated weighted means, medians, ranges, standard errors, confidence intervals, variances, multiplicative effects and design effects with these four weights. In addition, we compared the weighted prevalence of a key variable of the survey using these four weights. Results: We compared unweighted distribution with weighted ones and identified that weighting makes the sample distribution to conform to the target population. Among the four calculated weights, the trimmed weight had narrow standard error and variance, and smallest design and multiplicative effects. It yielded an acceptable prevalence and distribution of prevalence of mental disorder. Conclusion: Among the four weights, we show that the trimmed weight met all parameters of good quality and precision. We performed this complex exercise using Microsoft Excel which is largely available to researchers in Bangladesh. Therefore, we recommend using the trimmed weight for national level surveys in Bangladesh in a similar context. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2021; 47(2): 118-126
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国全国调查数据的权重:为什么、如何以及哪个权重?
背景:国家调查数据的加权使样本更能代表目标人群。称重程序是一项彻底的练习,可产生多种重量。然而,作者之间的体重差异很大,这让研究人员感到困惑。因此,研究人员经常在没有权重的情况下使用调查数据,从而得出错误的结论。此外,尽管有强大而昂贵的统计软件,但发展中国家的研究人员由于成本高昂,大多无法使用这些软件。在这篇文章中,我们分享了我们使用Microsoft Excel对孟加拉国最近的全国调查进行加权的经验。目标:总体目标是使用Excel对孟加拉国的全国调查执行样本加权。作为具体目标,该研究旨在创建不同的权重变量,描述其特征,并确定用于分析的适当权重。方法:我们生成了四种类型的权重:根据选择概率计算的基本权重,以及无反应调整的、群体校准调整的和修剪的权重。我们通过未加权和四种类型的加权数字比较了按性别和年龄划分的人口分布。最后,我们用这四个权重计算了加权平均值、中位数、范围、标准误差、置信区间、方差、乘法效应和设计效应。此外,我们使用这四个权重比较了调查中一个关键变量的加权患病率。结果:我们比较了未加权分布和加权分布,发现加权使样本分布符合目标人群。在四个计算权重中,修剪后的权重具有较小的标准误差和方差,设计和乘法效应最小。它得出了可接受的精神障碍的患病率和患病率分布。结论:在四个权重中,我们发现修剪后的权重满足所有质量和精度良好的参数。我们使用Microsoft Excel进行了这项复杂的练习,孟加拉国的研究人员基本上可以使用该软件。因此,我们建议在类似情况下,在孟加拉国的国家一级调查中使用修剪后的权重。2021年孟加拉医学研究会;47(2):118-126
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The official publication of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Spinal Fusion in Degenerated Spinal Stenosis, proposing a hybrid scoring system for Bangladesh people in law Sack pain Preoperative Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a predictor of malignant ovarian tumor Overview of Journals in Developing Countries Cell phone use and Self-reported wellbeing among teenage students of Bangladesh Association of Interleukin-10 Gene Polymorphism with Susceptibility and Severity of Axial Spondyloarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1