Neo-Ottomanism – Emergence, Ideology and Political Doctrine

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Evolution & History Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.30884/seh/2019.01.08
I. Hristov
{"title":"Neo-Ottomanism – Emergence, Ideology and Political Doctrine","authors":"I. Hristov","doi":"10.30884/seh/2019.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to examine the conceptual platform and political doctrines of neo-Ottomanism. In particular, the text aims to study the essence and positioning of neo-Ottomanism, its emergence and gradual assertion against the backdrop of the Turkish elite's doctrines that have taken shape throughout history, mostly at the contemporary stage of the decline of the Kemalist ideology. The paper holds the view that neoOttomanism is the validating ideology and policy of the new class of entrepreneurship in Turkey, which since the end of Cold War I has been relying on its new economic power, accumulated capital and military supremacy in the region in its attempt to expand its role in international relations. This policy is an attempt to combine values that are incompatible in essence, character and content. In particular, this means that the new ideology, which revives Islamism, aims to get incorporated within the political system of the secular state, and the final result is the Islamization of statehood; the ideology of neo-Ottomanism adheres to the Kemalist slogan of ‘zero problems’ with the neighbouring states, yet from the perspective of ‘strategic depth’, it inevitably leads to a political and possibly military expansion, which in turn ultimately gives rise to the contemporary form of revanchism (foreign policy aimed at revenge and regaining lost territories); the neo-Ottomanist ideology adheres to its ‘Western orientation’, displaying its aspirations at freeing Turkey from its dependence on the United States, which basically constitutes a claim for taking on the role of a global leader.","PeriodicalId":42677,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2019.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the conceptual platform and political doctrines of neo-Ottomanism. In particular, the text aims to study the essence and positioning of neo-Ottomanism, its emergence and gradual assertion against the backdrop of the Turkish elite's doctrines that have taken shape throughout history, mostly at the contemporary stage of the decline of the Kemalist ideology. The paper holds the view that neoOttomanism is the validating ideology and policy of the new class of entrepreneurship in Turkey, which since the end of Cold War I has been relying on its new economic power, accumulated capital and military supremacy in the region in its attempt to expand its role in international relations. This policy is an attempt to combine values that are incompatible in essence, character and content. In particular, this means that the new ideology, which revives Islamism, aims to get incorporated within the political system of the secular state, and the final result is the Islamization of statehood; the ideology of neo-Ottomanism adheres to the Kemalist slogan of ‘zero problems’ with the neighbouring states, yet from the perspective of ‘strategic depth’, it inevitably leads to a political and possibly military expansion, which in turn ultimately gives rise to the contemporary form of revanchism (foreign policy aimed at revenge and regaining lost territories); the neo-Ottomanist ideology adheres to its ‘Western orientation’, displaying its aspirations at freeing Turkey from its dependence on the United States, which basically constitutes a claim for taking on the role of a global leader.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新奥斯曼主义——兴起、意识形态和政治学说
本文旨在考察新奥斯曼主义的概念平台和政治学说。特别是,本文旨在研究新奥斯曼主义的本质和定位,它的出现和逐渐主张的背景下,土耳其精英的学说已经形成了整个历史,主要是在当代凯末尔主义意识形态的衰落阶段。本文认为,新奥斯曼主义是土耳其新企业家阶级的有效意识形态和政策,自第一次冷战结束以来,土耳其一直依靠其在该地区的新经济实力、积累的资本和军事优势,试图扩大其在国际关系中的作用。这一政策试图将本质、性质和内容都不相容的价值观结合起来。特别是,这意味着复兴伊斯兰主义的新意识形态旨在融入世俗国家的政治体系,其最终结果是国家的伊斯兰化;新奥斯曼主义的意识形态坚持与邻国“零问题”的凯末尔主义口号,但从“战略纵深”的角度来看,它不可避免地导致政治和可能的军事扩张,这反过来又最终导致当代形式的复仇主义(旨在报复和收复失地的外交政策);新奥斯曼主义意识形态坚持其“西方取向”,表现出其将土耳其从对美国的依赖中解放出来的愿望,这基本上构成了承担全球领导者角色的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Dois Tempos, Periférica Agenda Breve debate historiográfico sobre a evolução da filosofia da história: uma revisão de literatura Reforma agrária do Brasil e Peru da década de 60, sobre a ótica comparativa dos regimes militares The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism Egypt: From Upper Egyptian Rural Petty Polities to Unitary State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1