Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors

IF 0.9 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung Cancer Management Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.2217/lmt-2018-0016
M. Afzal, K. Dragnev, Tayyaba Sarwar, K. Shirai
{"title":"Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors","authors":"M. Afzal, K. Dragnev, Tayyaba Sarwar, K. Shirai","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To study the clinical benefits of concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Materials & methods: This is a retrospective review of 50 non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving ICIs with metformin (cohort A) or without metformin (cohort B). Patients were also stratified by ICIs as second-/third-line therapy. Results: Overall response rate and disease control rate were higher in cohort A (41.1 vs 30.7%, p = 0.4 and 70.5 vs 61.6%, p = 0.5, respectively). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A (11.5 vs 7.6 months, p = 0.5 and 4.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.6, respectively). On subset analysis (second-/third-line ICIs), overall response rate, disease control rate, median overall survival, progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A. Conclusion: Despite the small-sample size, we observed improved clinical outcomes in patients who received ICIs in combination with metformin.","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2018-0016","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2018-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Aim: To study the clinical benefits of concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Materials & methods: This is a retrospective review of 50 non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving ICIs with metformin (cohort A) or without metformin (cohort B). Patients were also stratified by ICIs as second-/third-line therapy. Results: Overall response rate and disease control rate were higher in cohort A (41.1 vs 30.7%, p = 0.4 and 70.5 vs 61.6%, p = 0.5, respectively). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A (11.5 vs 7.6 months, p = 0.5 and 4.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.6, respectively). On subset analysis (second-/third-line ICIs), overall response rate, disease control rate, median overall survival, progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A. Conclusion: Despite the small-sample size, we observed improved clinical outcomes in patients who received ICIs in combination with metformin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时接受二甲双胍和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结果
目的:研究二甲双胍联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗非小细胞肺癌癌症的临床疗效。材料与方法:这是一项对50例非小细胞肺癌癌症患者进行的回顾性综述,这些患者接受了含二甲双胍的ICIs(a组)或不含二甲双胍的ICIs(B组)。患者也按照ICIs进行分层,作为二线/三线治疗。结果:队列A的总有效率和疾病控制率较高(分别为41.1%和30.7%,p=0.4和70.5%和61.6%,p=0.5)。队列A的中位总生存期和无进展生存期也较高(分别为11.5个月和7.6个月,p=0.5和4.0个月和3.0个月,p=0.6)。在亚组分析(二线/三线ICIs)中,队列A的总有效率、疾病控制率、中位总生存率、无进展生存率也较高。结论:尽管样本量较小,但我们观察到接受ICIs联合二甲双胍治疗的患者的临床结果有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer Management
Lung Cancer Management RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Survival and quality-of-life outcomes in early-stage NSCLC patients: a literature review of real-world evidence. Alectinib for treating patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC: systematic review and network metanalysis. Real-world outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC: a single-center experience. Implementing physician education to increase lung cancer screening uptake. Proportion of biopsy specimens containing a tumor when compared to all biopsy specimens by transbronchial biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1