The meaningfulness of challenging the controlled drinking discourse. An autoethnographic study

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Qualitative Social Work Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1177/14733250231200499
S. Tønnessen
{"title":"The meaningfulness of challenging the controlled drinking discourse. An autoethnographic study","authors":"S. Tønnessen","doi":"10.1177/14733250231200499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being able to control ones drinking is an expression of attitudes in most western societies towards the act of drinking, and if losing control, one breaks with these attitudes. This is what I call the “controlled drinking discourse.” Loss of control can be understood as any drinking of alcohol which starts a chain of reaction that is felt as a physical and psychological demand for alcohol. This is a description of how I related to alcohol for years until a complete crisis of meaning in my life in 2014. In recovery research, different kinds of “doings” are well documented as meaningful, while meaningful ways of thinking is less explored. Ways of thinking is influenced by available discourses. Through an autoethnographic approach, I explore ways of thinking with use of an analytical framework focusing on the relationship between discourses, narratives, and small stories. I also discuss theories on non-drinking, alcoholism, and recovery. Doing a discursively shift in thinking by accepting that controlled drinking is not possible, is for me a meaningful and self-sustainable way of thinking, which keeps me sober and away from crisis of meaning in my life.","PeriodicalId":47677,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231200499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Being able to control ones drinking is an expression of attitudes in most western societies towards the act of drinking, and if losing control, one breaks with these attitudes. This is what I call the “controlled drinking discourse.” Loss of control can be understood as any drinking of alcohol which starts a chain of reaction that is felt as a physical and psychological demand for alcohol. This is a description of how I related to alcohol for years until a complete crisis of meaning in my life in 2014. In recovery research, different kinds of “doings” are well documented as meaningful, while meaningful ways of thinking is less explored. Ways of thinking is influenced by available discourses. Through an autoethnographic approach, I explore ways of thinking with use of an analytical framework focusing on the relationship between discourses, narratives, and small stories. I also discuss theories on non-drinking, alcoholism, and recovery. Doing a discursively shift in thinking by accepting that controlled drinking is not possible, is for me a meaningful and self-sustainable way of thinking, which keeps me sober and away from crisis of meaning in my life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战控制饮酒话语的意义。民族志研究
在大多数西方社会,能够控制自己的饮酒行为是对饮酒行为的一种态度的表达,如果失去控制,一个人就会打破这些态度。这就是我所说的“控制饮酒话语”。失控可以理解为任何饮酒引发的连锁反应,被认为是生理和心理上对酒精的需求。这是对我多年来与酒精的关系的描述,直到2014年我的生活完全失去了意义。在康复研究中,不同类型的“行为”被记录为有意义的,而有意义的思维方式却很少被探索。思维方式受到可用话语的影响。通过一种自我民族志的方法,我探索了使用分析框架的思维方式,重点关注话语、叙事和小故事之间的关系。我还讨论了不喝酒、酗酒和康复的理论。对我来说,通过接受控制饮酒是不可能的这一事实,来进行一种思维上的话语转变,是一种有意义的、自我持续的思维方式,它让我保持清醒,远离生活中意义的危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Qualitative Social Work provides a forum for those interested in qualitative research and evaluation and in qualitative approaches to practice. The journal facilitates interactive dialogue and integration between those interested in qualitative research and methodology and those involved in the world of practice. It reflects the fact that these worlds are increasingly international and interdisciplinary in nature. The journal is a forum for rigorous dialogue that promotes qualitatively informed professional practice and inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Toward a creative and imaginative research approach: Collage as a method of inquiry in social work Arts-based research with immigrant and racialized older adults: A scoping review. Book review: Time In this issue… How conversations can empower and involve: Building the evidence for Approved Mental Health Professionals’ communicative practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1