The space between the rock and the hard place: personality disorder diagnosis in people with intellectual disabilities

C. Downs, Kelly Rayner-Smith
{"title":"The space between the rock and the hard place: personality disorder diagnosis in people with intellectual disabilities","authors":"C. Downs, Kelly Rayner-Smith","doi":"10.1108/amhid-11-2021-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe assessment for and diagnosis of personality disorder (PD) continue to be contentious, with many prominent practitioner psychologists arguing against this specific label and providing a credible alternative framework to psychiatric diagnosis more generally. This paper aims to summarise the literature and support practitioners identifying PD in people with intellectual disabilities (ID).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nRelevant National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance and literature were reviewed to provide a service position on the assessment and diagnosis of PD in people with ID.\n\n\nFindings\nFor people with intellectual disabilities, the PD label can be even less robustly applied and may be even more pejorative and obstructive. That said, there are people for whom a PD diagnosis has clear clinical utility and opens access to suitable specialist services.\n\n\nPractical implications\nEvidence suggests that a diagnosis of PD can be both facilitative and obstructive, and the assessment and diagnosis process should, therefore, be undertaken with caution.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper presents an account of NICE guidance and evidence on the assessment and diagnosis of PD in people with intellectual disabilities.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-11-2021-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The assessment for and diagnosis of personality disorder (PD) continue to be contentious, with many prominent practitioner psychologists arguing against this specific label and providing a credible alternative framework to psychiatric diagnosis more generally. This paper aims to summarise the literature and support practitioners identifying PD in people with intellectual disabilities (ID). Design/methodology/approach Relevant National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance and literature were reviewed to provide a service position on the assessment and diagnosis of PD in people with ID. Findings For people with intellectual disabilities, the PD label can be even less robustly applied and may be even more pejorative and obstructive. That said, there are people for whom a PD diagnosis has clear clinical utility and opens access to suitable specialist services. Practical implications Evidence suggests that a diagnosis of PD can be both facilitative and obstructive, and the assessment and diagnosis process should, therefore, be undertaken with caution. Originality/value This paper presents an account of NICE guidance and evidence on the assessment and diagnosis of PD in people with intellectual disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩石和坚硬的地方之间的空间:智障人士的人格障碍诊断
目的人格障碍(PD)的评估和诊断一直存在争议,许多著名的执业心理学家反对这个特定的标签,并为更普遍的精神病学诊断提供一个可信的替代框架。本文旨在总结文献和支持从业者识别与智障人士(ID) PD。设计/方法/方法回顾了国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)的相关指南和文献,为ID患者PD的评估和诊断提供了服务地位。研究结果对于智障人士来说,PD的标签可能更不可靠,甚至可能更具贬义和阻碍性。也就是说,对有些人来说,PD诊断具有明确的临床效用,并可以获得合适的专业服务。实际意义证据表明,PD的诊断可能是促进性的,也可能是阻碍性的,因此,评估和诊断过程应谨慎进行。原创性/价值本文介绍了NICE在评估和诊断智障患者PD方面的指导和证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Kind minds: using the ‘compassionate kitbag’ in a compassion focused therapy group for adults with intellectual disabilities To say (sexual fetish)… or not to say (sexual fetish). That is the question Assessing adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence dementia assessment and diagnosis guidelines in adults with intellectual disability: a retrospective cohort study Project ECHO-AIDD: recommendations for care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities Forensic mental health intellectual and developmental disability service: an analysis of referral patterns and comparison with community mental health intellectual disability (MHID) services in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1