{"title":"Processing of German noun plurals: Evidence for first- and second-order schemata","authors":"K. Köpcke, Sarah Schimke, Verena Wecker","doi":"10.3366/WORD.2021.0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the question of how morphologically complex words are represented in the mental grammar of monolingual adult speakers of German. We contend that in perception, speakers assign a plural or singular meaning according to the degree of reliability to which a given shape is associated with the function singular or plural. In this article, we present the results of two lexical decision experiments with nonce words. In experiment 1, the nonce words presented are preceded by the article form die, and, in experiment 2, the same nonce words are presented as bare nouns. It turns out that the results for experiment 1 and 2 differ. Nevertheless, we argue that the results for both experiments can straightforwardly be explained by a schema account. More precisely, we distinguish between firstand second-order schemata. First-order schemata rely on the pure word form onto which a specific function is mapped. But, recent developments of the schema approach argue that in the speaker’s representation of word forms not only single schemata are stored and mapped onto specific functions, but rather schema-pairs, e.g. a singular and its most likely plural partner, referred to as *We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this article. Our thanks are also due to Linda Thornburg and Klaus Panther for correcting our English, and to Katie von Holzen for her help with statistics. Word Structure 14.1 (2021): 1–24 DOI: 10.3366/word.2021.0173 © Edinburgh University Press www.euppublishing.com/word ‘second-order schema’. The results of our experiments support the assumption of firstand second-order schemata and their interaction.","PeriodicalId":43166,"journal":{"name":"Word Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/WORD.2021.0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
德语名词复数的加工:一阶和二阶图式的证据
本文探讨了单语成年德语使用者的心理语法如何表征词形复杂的词。我们认为,在感知中,说话者根据一个给定形状与单数或复数功能相关联的可靠性程度来分配复数或单数意义。在这篇文章中,我们给出了两个关于临时词的词汇决策实验的结果。在实验1中,nonce单词的前面有冠词die,而在实验2中,相同的nonce单词以裸名词的形式呈现。实验1和实验2的结果是不同的。然而,我们认为两个实验的结果都可以直接用图式解释。更准确地说,我们区分一阶和二阶模式。一阶模式依赖于特定函数映射到的纯单词形式。但是,模式方法的最新发展表明,在说话者对单词形式的表示中,不仅存储了单个模式并将其映射到特定的功能上,而且还存储了模式对,例如,一个单数和它最有可能的复数伙伴,称为*。我们要感谢两位匿名评论者对本文早期版本的非常有帮助的评论。我们还要感谢琳达·索恩伯格和克劳斯·黑豹纠正我们的英语,感谢凯蒂·冯·霍尔岑在统计方面的帮助。Word Structure 14.1 (2021): 1-24 DOI: 10.3366/ Word .2021.0173©爱丁堡大学出版社www.euppublishing.com/word“二阶模式”。我们的实验结果支持一阶和二阶图式的假设及其相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。