IS CHRIST REALLY CONTRADICTORY? SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Manuscrito Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.mo
María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz
{"title":"IS CHRIST REALLY CONTRADICTORY? SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","authors":"María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.mo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Two of the most important outcomes of The Contradictory Christ include: (i) identifying Christ as an unproblematically contradictory being as well as (ii) laying the foundations of an 1 This research was supported by the Programa Nacional de Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES (Brazil) and by the UNAM-PAPIIT Project IN403719 “Intensionalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevancia lógica”. This work is the result of the book symposium on Jc Beall's The Contradictory Christ . investigation of the logical consequences of the existence of Christ, qua contradictory, within a particular 'theory'. In light of the enormous relevance of Beall’s The contradictory Christ for the study of inconsistency, my main concern here is to explore the effect of some methodological choices behind Beall’s proposal - this in order to recognize in more detail the scope of Beall’s contribution. To do so, I will focus on three main questions: 1. What is required for the identification of a contradiction? 2. How can we recognize a true contradiction from either an apparent or a temporal contradiction? 3. If we identify a true contradiction within a theory, where can we actually go from there?","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscrito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.mo","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Two of the most important outcomes of The Contradictory Christ include: (i) identifying Christ as an unproblematically contradictory being as well as (ii) laying the foundations of an 1 This research was supported by the Programa Nacional de Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES (Brazil) and by the UNAM-PAPIIT Project IN403719 “Intensionalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevancia lógica”. This work is the result of the book symposium on Jc Beall's The Contradictory Christ . investigation of the logical consequences of the existence of Christ, qua contradictory, within a particular 'theory'. In light of the enormous relevance of Beall’s The contradictory Christ for the study of inconsistency, my main concern here is to explore the effect of some methodological choices behind Beall’s proposal - this in order to recognize in more detail the scope of Beall’s contribution. To do so, I will focus on three main questions: 1. What is required for the identification of a contradiction? 2. How can we recognize a true contradiction from either an apparent or a temporal contradiction? 3. If we identify a true contradiction within a theory, where can we actually go from there?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基督真的自相矛盾吗?来自科学哲学的一些方法论问题
矛盾的基督的两个最重要的成果包括:(i)确定基督是一个毫无疑问的矛盾的存在,以及(ii)奠定了一个基础。这项研究得到了国家计划Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES(巴西)和UNAM-PAPIIT项目IN403719“intenonalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevanca lógica”的支持。这部作品是关于Jc Beall的《矛盾的基督》的书籍研讨会的结果。在一个特定的“理论”中,对基督存在的逻辑结果的调查,是矛盾的。鉴于比尔的《矛盾的基督》对不一致性研究的巨大相关性,我在这里主要关注的是探讨比尔的建议背后的一些方法论选择的影响——这是为了更详细地认识比尔贡献的范围。为此,我将集中讨论三个主要问题:1。识别矛盾需要什么?2. 我们如何从表面矛盾或时间矛盾中识别出真正的矛盾呢?3.如果我们在一个理论中发现了一个真正的矛盾,那么我们能从那里得到什么呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manuscrito
Manuscrito PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
“Believing at will is possible”−or is it? Some remarks on Peels’s “truth depends on belief” cases and voluntariness THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD ON THE ALLEGED ERROR OF FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO NORMATIVE ERROR THEORY Korsgaard's Expanded Regress Argument The Definition and Typological Model of a Dogwhistle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1