{"title":"IS CHRIST REALLY CONTRADICTORY? SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","authors":"María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz","doi":"10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.mo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Two of the most important outcomes of The Contradictory Christ include: (i) identifying Christ as an unproblematically contradictory being as well as (ii) laying the foundations of an 1 This research was supported by the Programa Nacional de Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES (Brazil) and by the UNAM-PAPIIT Project IN403719 “Intensionalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevancia lógica”. This work is the result of the book symposium on Jc Beall's The Contradictory Christ . investigation of the logical consequences of the existence of Christ, qua contradictory, within a particular 'theory'. In light of the enormous relevance of Beall’s The contradictory Christ for the study of inconsistency, my main concern here is to explore the effect of some methodological choices behind Beall’s proposal - this in order to recognize in more detail the scope of Beall’s contribution. To do so, I will focus on three main questions: 1. What is required for the identification of a contradiction? 2. How can we recognize a true contradiction from either an apparent or a temporal contradiction? 3. If we identify a true contradiction within a theory, where can we actually go from there?","PeriodicalId":42903,"journal":{"name":"Manuscrito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscrito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.mo","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
: Two of the most important outcomes of The Contradictory Christ include: (i) identifying Christ as an unproblematically contradictory being as well as (ii) laying the foundations of an 1 This research was supported by the Programa Nacional de Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES (Brazil) and by the UNAM-PAPIIT Project IN403719 “Intensionalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevancia lógica”. This work is the result of the book symposium on Jc Beall's The Contradictory Christ . investigation of the logical consequences of the existence of Christ, qua contradictory, within a particular 'theory'. In light of the enormous relevance of Beall’s The contradictory Christ for the study of inconsistency, my main concern here is to explore the effect of some methodological choices behind Beall’s proposal - this in order to recognize in more detail the scope of Beall’s contribution. To do so, I will focus on three main questions: 1. What is required for the identification of a contradiction? 2. How can we recognize a true contradiction from either an apparent or a temporal contradiction? 3. If we identify a true contradiction within a theory, where can we actually go from there?
矛盾的基督的两个最重要的成果包括:(i)确定基督是一个毫无疑问的矛盾的存在,以及(ii)奠定了一个基础。这项研究得到了国家计划Pós-Doutorado PNPD CAPES(巴西)和UNAM-PAPIIT项目IN403719“intenonalidad hasta el final: un nuevo plan para la relevanca lógica”的支持。这部作品是关于Jc Beall的《矛盾的基督》的书籍研讨会的结果。在一个特定的“理论”中,对基督存在的逻辑结果的调查,是矛盾的。鉴于比尔的《矛盾的基督》对不一致性研究的巨大相关性,我在这里主要关注的是探讨比尔的建议背后的一些方法论选择的影响——这是为了更详细地认识比尔贡献的范围。为此,我将集中讨论三个主要问题:1。识别矛盾需要什么?2. 我们如何从表面矛盾或时间矛盾中识别出真正的矛盾呢?3.如果我们在一个理论中发现了一个真正的矛盾,那么我们能从那里得到什么呢?