The effect of aging on short- and long-term results after esophagectomy: an international multicenter retrospective analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1093/dote/doad057
Valentina Mengardo, Jacopo Weindelmayer, Giovanni Ceccherini, Michelle Wilkinson, Giovanni de Manzoni, William Allum, Simone Giacopuzzi
{"title":"The effect of aging on short- and long-term results after esophagectomy: an international multicenter retrospective analysis.","authors":"Valentina Mengardo, Jacopo Weindelmayer, Giovanni Ceccherini, Michelle Wilkinson, Giovanni de Manzoni, William Allum, Simone Giacopuzzi","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal treatment for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is still debated and data on postoperative results are limited. This retrospective international study aims to clarify the impact of age on clinical and oncological outcomes after esophagectomy. All patients that underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2016 at two European high-volume Centers have been included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-age group (YAG) (18-69), middle-age group (70-74) and old-age group (>74). Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes considered were 5-year disease free survival and disease related survival, 90-day morbidity and mortality, readmission rate and radicality. A total of 575 patients were included. No differences emerged in terms of morbidity and length of stay, while mortality increased with aging from 2% in YAG to 4.8% in old-aged (P = 0.003). Old-age patients had less neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), a less aggressive mediastinal lymphadenectomy and presented a more advanced pathological stage. As expected, OS decreased significantly for older patients compared with the other two age groups (P = 0.044) but, on the other hand, disease free and disease related survival were comparable between the groups. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication to esophagectomy. Although in patients older than 75 years postoperative mortality is significantly increased, esophagectomy could be still an option in selected patients, favoring the use of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal treatment for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is still debated and data on postoperative results are limited. This retrospective international study aims to clarify the impact of age on clinical and oncological outcomes after esophagectomy. All patients that underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2016 at two European high-volume Centers have been included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-age group (YAG) (18-69), middle-age group (70-74) and old-age group (>74). Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes considered were 5-year disease free survival and disease related survival, 90-day morbidity and mortality, readmission rate and radicality. A total of 575 patients were included. No differences emerged in terms of morbidity and length of stay, while mortality increased with aging from 2% in YAG to 4.8% in old-aged (P = 0.003). Old-age patients had less neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), a less aggressive mediastinal lymphadenectomy and presented a more advanced pathological stage. As expected, OS decreased significantly for older patients compared with the other two age groups (P = 0.044) but, on the other hand, disease free and disease related survival were comparable between the groups. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication to esophagectomy. Although in patients older than 75 years postoperative mortality is significantly increased, esophagectomy could be still an option in selected patients, favoring the use of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衰老对食管切除术后短期和长期疗效的影响:一项国际多中心回顾性分析
老年食管癌患者的最佳治疗方法仍有争议,术后结果数据有限。这项回顾性国际研究旨在阐明年龄对食管切除术后临床和肿瘤预后的影响。2007年至2016年期间在两个欧洲大容量中心接受食管癌切除术的所有患者都被纳入该研究。患者按年龄分为青壮年组(YAG)(18 ~ 69岁)、中年组(70 ~ 74岁)和老年组(> ~ 74岁)。主要结局是5年总生存期(OS),次要结局是5年无病生存期和疾病相关生存期、90天发病率和死亡率、再入院率和根治性。共纳入575例患者。发病率和住院时间方面没有差异,而死亡率随着年龄的增长而增加,从青年组的2%增加到老年组的4.8% (P = 0.003)。老年患者的新辅助治疗较少(P < 0.001),纵隔淋巴结切除术的侵袭性较小,病理分期更晚。正如预期的那样,与其他两个年龄组相比,老年患者的OS显着下降(P = 0.044),但另一方面,两组之间的无病生存率和疾病相关生存率具有可比性。年龄本身不应被视为食道切除术的禁忌症。尽管75岁以上的患者术后死亡率显著增加,但在某些患者中,食管切除术仍然是一种选择,更倾向于使用微创技术和增强恢复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1