A comparative study on agarose acetate and PDLLA scaffold for rabbit femur defect regeneration

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomedical materials Pub Date : 2019-09-20 DOI:10.1088/1748-605X/ab3c1b
Ruifang Zhao, Zunkai Xu, Bing Li, Tao Chen, Naibin Mei, Chuang Wang, Zongbao Zhou, Lingling You, Chaoxi Wu, Xiaoying Wang, Shunqing Tang
{"title":"A comparative study on agarose acetate and PDLLA scaffold for rabbit femur defect regeneration","authors":"Ruifang Zhao, Zunkai Xu, Bing Li, Tao Chen, Naibin Mei, Chuang Wang, Zongbao Zhou, Lingling You, Chaoxi Wu, Xiaoying Wang, Shunqing Tang","doi":"10.1088/1748-605X/ab3c1b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of degradable polymer scaffolds is a key issue in bone regeneration. Poly(D, L-lactide) (PDLLA) and its derivatives have usually been applied to the construction of degradable scaffolds, but these scaffolds had problems with acidic degradation products and quick loss of mechanic strength during the later degradation, which usually led to scaffold collapse and cavity formation because of the slower rate of bone regeneration. In the present paper, a polysaccharide derivative, agarose acetate (AGA), was synthesized and a novel porous AGA scaffold was successfully developed through a salt-leaching process. The AGA scaffold had over 90% porosity without swelling in water, and compared to collapse and acidic products of PDLLA scaffold during degradation, the AGA scaffold maintained a stable morphology and a nearly neutral pH value over 18 months’ degradation in PBS. A bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) adhesion and proliferation experiment showed that more cells adhered to the AGA scaffold than to the PDLLA scaffold. A subcutaneous implant test showed that the AGA scaffold slowly degraded and did not cause an inflammatory response surrounding the implantation lesion site. AGA scaffold was implanted into femur defects in New Zealand white rabbits to test its in vivo performance. Results indicated that the AGA scaffold accelerated the process of bone regeneration compared to the PDLLA group and, with time, new bone was formed from the margin toward the center of the scaffolds, and the scaffold left in place retained its porous structure without collapsing. Meanwhile, the AGA scaffold showed a low degradation rate and kept its shape during the in vivo degradation compared to the PDLLA scaffold. This performance could have the benefit of integrated regenerative bone being formed instead of cavities due to the quickly degraded scaffold disappearing. These results demonstrate that the AGA scaffold has significant potential in bone regeneration applications.","PeriodicalId":9016,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/1748-605X/ab3c1b","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab3c1b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The development of degradable polymer scaffolds is a key issue in bone regeneration. Poly(D, L-lactide) (PDLLA) and its derivatives have usually been applied to the construction of degradable scaffolds, but these scaffolds had problems with acidic degradation products and quick loss of mechanic strength during the later degradation, which usually led to scaffold collapse and cavity formation because of the slower rate of bone regeneration. In the present paper, a polysaccharide derivative, agarose acetate (AGA), was synthesized and a novel porous AGA scaffold was successfully developed through a salt-leaching process. The AGA scaffold had over 90% porosity without swelling in water, and compared to collapse and acidic products of PDLLA scaffold during degradation, the AGA scaffold maintained a stable morphology and a nearly neutral pH value over 18 months’ degradation in PBS. A bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) adhesion and proliferation experiment showed that more cells adhered to the AGA scaffold than to the PDLLA scaffold. A subcutaneous implant test showed that the AGA scaffold slowly degraded and did not cause an inflammatory response surrounding the implantation lesion site. AGA scaffold was implanted into femur defects in New Zealand white rabbits to test its in vivo performance. Results indicated that the AGA scaffold accelerated the process of bone regeneration compared to the PDLLA group and, with time, new bone was formed from the margin toward the center of the scaffolds, and the scaffold left in place retained its porous structure without collapsing. Meanwhile, the AGA scaffold showed a low degradation rate and kept its shape during the in vivo degradation compared to the PDLLA scaffold. This performance could have the benefit of integrated regenerative bone being formed instead of cavities due to the quickly degraded scaffold disappearing. These results demonstrate that the AGA scaffold has significant potential in bone regeneration applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
琼脂糖醋酸酯与PDLLA支架用于兔股骨缺损再生的比较研究
可降解聚合物支架的开发是骨再生中的一个关键问题。聚(D,L-丙交酯)(PDLLA)及其衍生物通常被应用于可降解支架的构建,但这些支架在后期降解过程中存在酸性降解产物和机械强度快速损失的问题,这通常导致支架坍塌和空腔形成,因为骨再生速率较慢。本文合成了一种多糖衍生物琼脂糖乙酸酯(AGA),并通过盐浸工艺成功开发了一种新型多孔AGA支架。AGA支架具有超过90%的孔隙率,在水中没有溶胀,并且与降解过程中PDLLA支架的塌陷和酸性产物相比,AGA支架在PBS中降解18个月后保持稳定的形态和几乎中性的pH值。骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSC)粘附和增殖实验表明,与PDLLA支架相比,更多的细胞粘附在AGA支架上。皮下植入试验表明,AGA支架缓慢降解,在植入损伤部位周围没有引起炎症反应。将AGA支架植入新西兰大白鼠股骨缺损处,以测试其体内性能。结果表明,与PDLLA组相比,AGA支架加速了骨再生过程,随着时间的推移,新骨从支架的边缘向中心形成,留在原位的支架保持其多孔结构而不会塌陷。同时,与PDLLA支架相比,AGA支架在体内降解过程中表现出较低的降解率并保持其形状。这种性能可能有利于形成完整的再生骨,而不是由于快速降解的支架消失而形成空腔。这些结果表明AGA支架在骨再生应用中具有显著的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical materials
Biomedical materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
294
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the journal is to publish original research findings and critical reviews that contribute to our knowledge about the composition, properties, and performance of materials for all applications relevant to human healthcare. Typical areas of interest include (but are not limited to): -Synthesis/characterization of biomedical materials- Nature-inspired synthesis/biomineralization of biomedical materials- In vitro/in vivo performance of biomedical materials- Biofabrication technologies/applications: 3D bioprinting, bioink development, bioassembly & biopatterning- Microfluidic systems (including disease models): fabrication, testing & translational applications- Tissue engineering/regenerative medicine- Interaction of molecules/cells with materials- Effects of biomaterials on stem cell behaviour- Growth factors/genes/cells incorporated into biomedical materials- Biophysical cues/biocompatibility pathways in biomedical materials performance- Clinical applications of biomedical materials for cell therapies in disease (cancer etc)- Nanomedicine, nanotoxicology and nanopathology- Pharmacokinetic considerations in drug delivery systems- Risks of contrast media in imaging systems- Biosafety aspects of gene delivery agents- Preclinical and clinical performance of implantable biomedical materials- Translational and regulatory matters
期刊最新文献
A low-swelling alginate hydrogel with antibacterial hemostatic and radical scavenging properties for open wound healing. Evaluation of properties for Carbothane™ 3575A-based electrospun vascular grafts in vitro and in vivo. Migration and retention of human osteosarcoma cells in bioceramic graft with open channel architecture designed for bone tissue engineering. Enhancement of induction heating capability of bioactive SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5 glass-ceramics by selective substitution with magnetite nanoparticles Antiproliferative efficacy and mechanism of action of garlic phytochemicals-functionalized gold nanoparticles in triple-negative breast cancer cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1