Efficacy of a Multi-Level Pilot Intervention (“Harmony”) to Reduce Discrimination Faced by Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Public Hospitals in India: Findings from a Pre- and Post-Test Quasi-Experimental Trial among Healthcare Workers

Venkatesan Chakrapani, S. Nair, S. Subramaniam, K. Ranade, Biji Mohan, Ruban Nelson, Sajeesh T. Sivaraman, M. Shunmugam, J. Kaur, S. Rawat, Theranirajan Ethirajan, Chinmoyee Das, Shobini Rajan, A. Puri, Bhawani Singh Kushwaha, Bhawna Rao, Utpal Das, V. Verma, Neha Kapoor
{"title":"Efficacy of a Multi-Level Pilot Intervention (“Harmony”) to Reduce Discrimination Faced by Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Public Hospitals in India: Findings from a Pre- and Post-Test Quasi-Experimental Trial among Healthcare Workers","authors":"Venkatesan Chakrapani, S. Nair, S. Subramaniam, K. Ranade, Biji Mohan, Ruban Nelson, Sajeesh T. Sivaraman, M. Shunmugam, J. Kaur, S. Rawat, Theranirajan Ethirajan, Chinmoyee Das, Shobini Rajan, A. Puri, Bhawani Singh Kushwaha, Bhawna Rao, Utpal Das, V. Verma, Neha Kapoor","doi":"10.3390/venereology2030009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing the stigma and discrimination faced by men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in healthcare settings is key to improving health outcomes. Using a one-group pre- and post-test design, we tested the efficacy of a theory-informed, multi-level pilot intervention (“Harmony”) among 98 healthcare workers (HCWs) to reduce sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI)-related stigma and discrimination faced by MSM and TGW in two public hospitals. The intervention contained group-level (a half-day workshop) and individual-level (four videos) components. Using multi-level modelling, we compared knowledge, attitudes, and comfort level among HCWs across three timepoints: pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up (2 months after the intervention). Client surveys were conducted among 400 MSM/TGW (two independent samples of 200 MSM/TGW) attending the intervention hospitals, before the intervention among HCWs and three months after the intervention. Generalised estimating equations assessed service users’ satisfaction with hospital services, discrimination experiences, and positive interactions with HCWs. Significant changes were observed in primary outcomes: 30% increase in positive attitude scores (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.30, 95% CI 1.13–1.49) and 23% increase in the proportion of HCWs reporting being comfortable in providing care to MSM/TGW (IRR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.03–1.68). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in secondary outcomes (scores): support for non-discriminatory hospital policies (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.004–1.15), the importance of asking SOGI questions in clinical history (IRR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.29), and perceived self-efficacy in providing clinical care (IRR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01–1.27). Service users’ data provided corroborative evidence for intervention efficacy: e.g., 14% increase in the proportion of MSM reporting overall satisfaction with hospital services and 6% and 15% increase in the scores of positive interactions with HCWs in the combined sample of MSM/TGW and TGW, respectively. The Harmony intervention showed preliminary evidence for improving positive attitudes, comfort level, and understanding of the healthcare issues of MSM/TGW among HCWs, warranting large-scale implementation research.","PeriodicalId":75296,"journal":{"name":"Venereology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Venereology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology2030009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing the stigma and discrimination faced by men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in healthcare settings is key to improving health outcomes. Using a one-group pre- and post-test design, we tested the efficacy of a theory-informed, multi-level pilot intervention (“Harmony”) among 98 healthcare workers (HCWs) to reduce sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI)-related stigma and discrimination faced by MSM and TGW in two public hospitals. The intervention contained group-level (a half-day workshop) and individual-level (four videos) components. Using multi-level modelling, we compared knowledge, attitudes, and comfort level among HCWs across three timepoints: pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up (2 months after the intervention). Client surveys were conducted among 400 MSM/TGW (two independent samples of 200 MSM/TGW) attending the intervention hospitals, before the intervention among HCWs and three months after the intervention. Generalised estimating equations assessed service users’ satisfaction with hospital services, discrimination experiences, and positive interactions with HCWs. Significant changes were observed in primary outcomes: 30% increase in positive attitude scores (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.30, 95% CI 1.13–1.49) and 23% increase in the proportion of HCWs reporting being comfortable in providing care to MSM/TGW (IRR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.03–1.68). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in secondary outcomes (scores): support for non-discriminatory hospital policies (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.004–1.15), the importance of asking SOGI questions in clinical history (IRR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.29), and perceived self-efficacy in providing clinical care (IRR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01–1.27). Service users’ data provided corroborative evidence for intervention efficacy: e.g., 14% increase in the proportion of MSM reporting overall satisfaction with hospital services and 6% and 15% increase in the scores of positive interactions with HCWs in the combined sample of MSM/TGW and TGW, respectively. The Harmony intervention showed preliminary evidence for improving positive attitudes, comfort level, and understanding of the healthcare issues of MSM/TGW among HCWs, warranting large-scale implementation research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层次试点干预(“和谐”)减少印度公立医院男男性行为者和变性女性面临歧视的效果:在医护人员中进行的测试前和测试后准实验试验的结果
减少与男性发生性关系的男性(MSM)和跨性别女性(TGW)在医疗环境中面临的耻辱和歧视是改善健康状况的关键。使用一组测试前和测试后设计,我们在两家公立医院的98名医护人员中测试了基于理论的多层次试点干预(“和谐”)的有效性,以减少MSM和TGW面临的与性取向和性别认同(SOGI)相关的污名和歧视。干预措施包括小组层面(半天研讨会)和个人层面(四个视频)。使用多层次模型,我们比较了干预前、干预后和随访(干预后2个月)三个时间点的HCW的知识、态度和舒适度。在干预前和干预后三个月,对在干预医院就诊的400名MSM/TGW(200名MSM/TGW的两个独立样本)进行了客户调查。广义估计方程评估了服务用户对医院服务的满意度、歧视经历以及与HCW的积极互动。主要结果发生了显著变化:积极态度得分增加了30%(发病率比率(IRR)=1.30,95%CI 1.13-1.49),报告对MSM/TGW提供护理感到满意的HCW比例增加了23%(IRR=1.23,95%CI 0.03-1.68)。同样,次要结果(得分)有显著改善:支持非歧视性医院政策(IRR=1.08,95%CI 1.004-1.15),在临床病史中询问SOGI问题的重要性(IRR=1.17,95%CI 1.06-1.29),以及在提供临床护理方面的感知自我效能感(IRR=1.13,95%CI 1.01-1.27)。服务用户的数据为干预效果提供了确证:例如,在MSM/TGW和TGW的联合样本中,MSM报告对医院服务总体满意度的比例分别增加了14%,与HCW的积极互动得分分别增加了6%和15%。Harmony干预显示了改善HCW中MSM/TGW的积极态度、舒适度和对医疗保健问题的理解的初步证据,值得进行大规模的实施研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Screening for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer in Gay and Bisexual Men: Acceptability and Predicting Possible Use of "Oral Selfies" by Smartphone as a Secondary Prevention Approach. Racial Disparities Associated with Increased Burden of Sexually Transmitted Infections in North Carolina, Southeastern United States Seroprevalence of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection among HIV Patients in Edo State, Southern Nigeria Advancing Syphilis Research: Exploring New Frontiers in Immunology and Pharmacological Interventions Pangenome Analysis Reveals a High Degree of Genetic Diversity in Gardnerella vaginalis: An In Silico Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1