Impact of a high-touch, collaborative, patient-centric, hepatitis C specialty clinical program on completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir therapy

Melissa Swoope, C. Bertram, Randi Krouskos, G. Peeler, C. Wood
{"title":"Impact of a high-touch, collaborative, patient-centric, hepatitis C specialty clinical program on completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir therapy","authors":"Melissa Swoope, C. Bertram, Randi Krouskos, G. Peeler, C. Wood","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Hepatitis C (Hep C) is a liver infection caused by the Hep C virus. It is the most common, chronic, blood-borne infection in the US. It is estimated to affect as many as 3 million Americans and is the leading cause of liver transplants in the US. Hep C is often curable with newer antiviral therapy that is short in duration of treatment and more tolerable than traditional therapies. Aims: To measure the impact of a high-touch, specialty clinical program on driving therapy completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Hep C patients. Methods: This study was performed from a single center specialty pharmacy (SP). We evaluated patients initiating glecaprevir/pibrentasvir from February to March 2019. The outreach strategy included onboarding new-to-therapy patients by pharmacy technician specialists through the completion of a “Welcome Call”. The technician specialists determined the best time with every patient’s input for the pharmacist to follow up with a “New Start Pharmacist Initial Counseling Call”. A clinical pharmacist completed the Hep C counseling call. Afterward, a nursing refill reminder call was completed. Also, a “Patient Care Coordinator Refill Reminder Call” was coordinated to set up the shipment of the medication. After the patient completed their final refill, a nurse generated an “End of Therapy Call” to determine whether completion of therapy occurred. Results: Of the 46 patients managed by the SP, 44 patients received the cumulative days’ supply required to complete therapy. The SP had a 100% completion rate of therapy for the patients that were eligible to continue therapy. Two patients, due to allergic reactions, were not eligible to complete therapy. As such, this resulted in an overall completion rate of 96%. All patients received an initial counseling call. Thirty of the 46 patients received refill reminder calls from a nurse; 16 patients were not eligible for this call due to the patient reaching out to the pharmacy prior to the refill reminder call for their shipment, refill not applicable or allergies to the medication. Forty-four patients had end-of-therapy calls completed. Conclusions: A collaborative, high-touch SP, managing Hep C patients, drove a high rate of completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir Hep C therapy (100% of patients eligible). Specialty pharmacies that demonstrate improved Hep C completion rate outcomes with robust, coordinated care processes can be more confident in building future value-based reimbursement models with payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers.","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"8 1","pages":"44 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Hepatitis C (Hep C) is a liver infection caused by the Hep C virus. It is the most common, chronic, blood-borne infection in the US. It is estimated to affect as many as 3 million Americans and is the leading cause of liver transplants in the US. Hep C is often curable with newer antiviral therapy that is short in duration of treatment and more tolerable than traditional therapies. Aims: To measure the impact of a high-touch, specialty clinical program on driving therapy completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Hep C patients. Methods: This study was performed from a single center specialty pharmacy (SP). We evaluated patients initiating glecaprevir/pibrentasvir from February to March 2019. The outreach strategy included onboarding new-to-therapy patients by pharmacy technician specialists through the completion of a “Welcome Call”. The technician specialists determined the best time with every patient’s input for the pharmacist to follow up with a “New Start Pharmacist Initial Counseling Call”. A clinical pharmacist completed the Hep C counseling call. Afterward, a nursing refill reminder call was completed. Also, a “Patient Care Coordinator Refill Reminder Call” was coordinated to set up the shipment of the medication. After the patient completed their final refill, a nurse generated an “End of Therapy Call” to determine whether completion of therapy occurred. Results: Of the 46 patients managed by the SP, 44 patients received the cumulative days’ supply required to complete therapy. The SP had a 100% completion rate of therapy for the patients that were eligible to continue therapy. Two patients, due to allergic reactions, were not eligible to complete therapy. As such, this resulted in an overall completion rate of 96%. All patients received an initial counseling call. Thirty of the 46 patients received refill reminder calls from a nurse; 16 patients were not eligible for this call due to the patient reaching out to the pharmacy prior to the refill reminder call for their shipment, refill not applicable or allergies to the medication. Forty-four patients had end-of-therapy calls completed. Conclusions: A collaborative, high-touch SP, managing Hep C patients, drove a high rate of completion of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir Hep C therapy (100% of patients eligible). Specialty pharmacies that demonstrate improved Hep C completion rate outcomes with robust, coordinated care processes can be more confident in building future value-based reimbursement models with payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高接触、协作、以患者为中心的丙型肝炎专科临床项目对完成格列卡韦/皮布伦他韦治疗的影响
摘要背景:丙型肝炎是由丙型肝炎病毒引起的肝脏感染。它是美国最常见的慢性血源性感染。据估计,它影响了多达300万美国人,是美国肝移植的主要原因。丙型肝炎通常可以通过较新的抗病毒疗法治愈,这种疗法治疗时间短,比传统疗法更耐受。目的:测量高接触度、专业临床项目对丙型肝炎患者完成格列卡韦/皮布伦他韦治疗的影响。方法:本研究在一家单中心专业药房(SP)进行。我们评估了2019年2月至3月期间开始使用格列卡韦/皮布伦他韦的患者。外联战略包括通过完成“欢迎电话”,由药学技术专家为新的治疗患者提供服务。技术专家根据每位患者的意见确定最佳时间,让药剂师跟进“新起点药剂师初始咨询电话”。一位临床药剂师完成了丙型肝炎咨询电话。之后,完成了护理补充提醒电话。此外,还协调了“患者护理协调员补充提醒电话”,以安排药物的装运。在患者完成最后一次补充后,护士发出“治疗结束电话”,以确定是否完成了治疗。结果:在SP管理的46名患者中,44名患者获得了完成治疗所需的累计天数供应。对于有资格继续治疗的患者,SP的治疗完成率为100%。两名患者由于过敏反应,没有资格完成治疗。因此,这导致了96%的总体完成率。所有患者都接到了初步咨询电话。46名患者中有30人接到了护士打来的补充提醒电话;16名患者不符合此电话的资格,因为患者在重新填充提醒电话之前联系了药房,要求他们发货、重新填充不适用或对药物过敏。44名患者完成了治疗结束电话。结论:一个协作的、高接触的SP,管理丙型肝炎患者,推动了高完成率的格列卡韦/皮布伦他韦丙型肝炎治疗(100%符合条件的患者)。通过稳健、协调的护理流程,证明丙型肝炎完成率提高的专业药房可以更有信心与付款人和制药商建立未来基于价值的报销模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1