Author preferences for open access in Portugal: survey findings

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Management Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1108/lm-10-2022-0090
M. Carvalho, Michael Boock, Tania Y. Todorova, Susana Martins, Ines Braga, Cláudia Pinto
{"title":"Author preferences for open access in Portugal: survey findings","authors":"M. Carvalho, Michael Boock, Tania Y. Todorova, Susana Martins, Ines Braga, Cláudia Pinto","doi":"10.1108/lm-10-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSurveying authors at doctoral-granting institutions of higher education in Portugal, the authors in this paper aim to seek to determine the extent to which Portuguese researchers prefer that their work appears in open access journals or open access repositories resulting in improved access to quality, peer-reviewed scientific information and faster scientific and technological advances. The authors also seek to gauge Portuguese author's familiarity with open access, the importance they attach to open access when choosing a publication outlet, and to determine their preferences for achieving open access.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology adopted in this research is the case study. The case study intends to understand a complex social phenomenon through an in-depth study holistically. In May 2020, the authors distributed a survey to faculty in all academic ranks at 14 Portuguese higher education institutions to learn the extent to which Portuguese authors currently make their research openly available, ascertain their awareness of open access, their support of the European Union (EU) open access goal and their preferences for achieving open access.FindingsResearchers at Portuguese universities overwhelmingly are aware of arguments in favor of open access and believe that open access benefits researchers in their fields. Portuguese researchers regularly publish in open access journals and deposit their papers in institutional or disciplinary repositories.Research limitations/implications16.7% of 740 potential respondents completed the survey. The relatively low response rate prevents extrapolations from being made to the universe. The study was implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, which, due to the disruption created in all sectors, made data collection complex and delayed its subsequent treatment.Originality/valueSimilar studies have been conducted at individual universities and in particular disciplines to determine the degree to which their faculty authors are aware of open access, its benefits, and preferences for achieving it. A similar study of Bulgarian university authors was conducted in 2018. No previous study of Portuguese authors at institutions of higher education has been conducted. The results will be useful to Portuguese institutions of higher education and academic libraries to establish and revise open access outreach and implementation services that may be helpful to their faculty in meeting EU open access and funder open access requirements.","PeriodicalId":46701,"journal":{"name":"Library Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-10-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSurveying authors at doctoral-granting institutions of higher education in Portugal, the authors in this paper aim to seek to determine the extent to which Portuguese researchers prefer that their work appears in open access journals or open access repositories resulting in improved access to quality, peer-reviewed scientific information and faster scientific and technological advances. The authors also seek to gauge Portuguese author's familiarity with open access, the importance they attach to open access when choosing a publication outlet, and to determine their preferences for achieving open access.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology adopted in this research is the case study. The case study intends to understand a complex social phenomenon through an in-depth study holistically. In May 2020, the authors distributed a survey to faculty in all academic ranks at 14 Portuguese higher education institutions to learn the extent to which Portuguese authors currently make their research openly available, ascertain their awareness of open access, their support of the European Union (EU) open access goal and their preferences for achieving open access.FindingsResearchers at Portuguese universities overwhelmingly are aware of arguments in favor of open access and believe that open access benefits researchers in their fields. Portuguese researchers regularly publish in open access journals and deposit their papers in institutional or disciplinary repositories.Research limitations/implications16.7% of 740 potential respondents completed the survey. The relatively low response rate prevents extrapolations from being made to the universe. The study was implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, which, due to the disruption created in all sectors, made data collection complex and delayed its subsequent treatment.Originality/valueSimilar studies have been conducted at individual universities and in particular disciplines to determine the degree to which their faculty authors are aware of open access, its benefits, and preferences for achieving it. A similar study of Bulgarian university authors was conducted in 2018. No previous study of Portuguese authors at institutions of higher education has been conducted. The results will be useful to Portuguese institutions of higher education and academic libraries to establish and revise open access outreach and implementation services that may be helpful to their faculty in meeting EU open access and funder open access requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙开放获取作者偏好:调查结果
通过对葡萄牙高等教育博士学位授予机构的作者进行调查,本文的作者旨在确定葡萄牙研究人员在多大程度上倾向于将他们的工作发表在开放获取期刊或开放获取知识库上,从而提高对质量、同行评审的科学信息的获取,加快科学和技术进步。作者还试图衡量葡萄牙作者对开放获取的熟悉程度,他们在选择出版渠道时对开放获取的重视程度,并确定他们对实现开放获取的偏好。本研究采用的方法是案例研究法。案例研究旨在通过对一个复杂的社会现象的整体深入研究来理解它。2020年5月,作者向14所葡萄牙高等教育机构的所有学术级别的教师分发了一份调查,以了解葡萄牙作者目前将其研究公开获取的程度,确定他们对开放获取的认识,他们对欧盟(EU)开放获取目标的支持以及他们对实现开放获取的偏好。葡萄牙大学的研究人员绝大多数都意识到支持开放获取的论点,并相信开放获取有利于他们领域的研究人员。葡萄牙研究人员定期在开放获取期刊上发表论文,并将论文存放在机构或学科知识库中。研究局限/启示740名潜在受访者中有16.7%完成了调查。相对较低的响应率阻止了对宇宙的推断。该研究是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间开展的,由于所有部门受到干扰,数据收集变得复杂,并延误了后续处理。独创性/价值在个别大学和特定学科中进行了类似的研究,以确定其教师作者对开放获取的认识程度,其好处以及实现开放获取的偏好。2018年对保加利亚大学作者进行了类似的研究。以前没有对高等教育机构的葡萄牙作家进行过研究。研究结果将有助于葡萄牙高等教育机构和学术图书馆建立和修订开放获取外展和实施服务,这可能有助于他们的教师满足欧盟开放获取和基金开放获取的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Management
Library Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: ■strategic management ■HRM/HRO ■cultural diversity ■information use ■managing change ■quality management ■leadership ■teamwork ■marketing ■outsourcing ■automation ■library finance ■charging ■performance measurement ■data protection and copyright As information services become more complex in nature and more technologically sophisticated, managers need to keep pace with innovations and thinking in the field to offer the most professional service with the resources they have.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of department at Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia In the line of disaster: preparedness and effective response of academic libraries in Malaysia Digitalization for enhancing reading habits: the improved hybrid book recommendation system with genre-oriented profiles Overwhelming effects of COVID-19 on public library services and recovery perspectives Evaluating the impact of LIS continuing professional development programmes: a survey of university libraries in Northern India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1