From Extreme Weather Events to ‘Cascading Vulnerabilities’: Participatory Flood Research Methodologies in Brazil During COVID-19

N. Calvillo, Joanne Garde-Hansen, Fernanda Lima-Silva, Rachel Trajber, J. Albuquerque
{"title":"From Extreme Weather Events to ‘Cascading Vulnerabilities’: Participatory Flood Research Methodologies in Brazil During COVID-19","authors":"N. Calvillo, Joanne Garde-Hansen, Fernanda Lima-Silva, Rachel Trajber, J. Albuquerque","doi":"10.1142/s2345737622410020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme weather events are entangled with each other and with other extreme events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-racist protests, drought, a housing crisis, strikes, or climate emergencies, as well as with more general inadequacies due to national, economic, and political upheavals and accreted vulnerabilities from long-term policies or inactions. Effects of extreme weather events are intensified by ongoing social injustices like poverty and structural racism, a housing deficit, and the consequent informal and unplanned occupation of hazardous areas, such as riverbanks, and areas of previous social-environmental disasters. In the context of Brazil, the ongoing deforestation in the Amazon (agribusiness, mining and illegal wood) provoking droughts and energy shortages in the region creates further vulnerabilities that are felt globally. In this paper, our primary contribution to these inter-connected scenarios is to describe methodological interventions that were made in response to COVID-19, and to show how those changes provided new insights into vulnerability processes of both subjects and researchers. During a larger project (Waterproofing Data), focused on the case study research areas of São Paulo and Acre (Brazil) wherein our wider team conducted flood-risk community research, we were forced to rethink our approach. We moved away from the singularity of the flood event and its impacts toward acknowledging the cascading conditions of social vulnerability (caused by weather, health, social and political conditions). In this paper, we directly address the ‘cascade of vulnerabilities’ that the flood-prone communities already encounter when researchers seek to engage with them. We open new avenues to reconsider citizenship, space, and innovation in terms of the key challenges that our methods encountered when conducting participatory flood research methodologies, particularly during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to November 2021. Through flood research in Brazil, we articulate methodological contributions from the arts, humanities, and social sciences for more realistic, just, and caring research practices within and about weather in the context of ‘slow violence’ [Nixon, R (2013). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP].","PeriodicalId":73748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of extreme events","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of extreme events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737622410020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Extreme weather events are entangled with each other and with other extreme events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-racist protests, drought, a housing crisis, strikes, or climate emergencies, as well as with more general inadequacies due to national, economic, and political upheavals and accreted vulnerabilities from long-term policies or inactions. Effects of extreme weather events are intensified by ongoing social injustices like poverty and structural racism, a housing deficit, and the consequent informal and unplanned occupation of hazardous areas, such as riverbanks, and areas of previous social-environmental disasters. In the context of Brazil, the ongoing deforestation in the Amazon (agribusiness, mining and illegal wood) provoking droughts and energy shortages in the region creates further vulnerabilities that are felt globally. In this paper, our primary contribution to these inter-connected scenarios is to describe methodological interventions that were made in response to COVID-19, and to show how those changes provided new insights into vulnerability processes of both subjects and researchers. During a larger project (Waterproofing Data), focused on the case study research areas of São Paulo and Acre (Brazil) wherein our wider team conducted flood-risk community research, we were forced to rethink our approach. We moved away from the singularity of the flood event and its impacts toward acknowledging the cascading conditions of social vulnerability (caused by weather, health, social and political conditions). In this paper, we directly address the ‘cascade of vulnerabilities’ that the flood-prone communities already encounter when researchers seek to engage with them. We open new avenues to reconsider citizenship, space, and innovation in terms of the key challenges that our methods encountered when conducting participatory flood research methodologies, particularly during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to November 2021. Through flood research in Brazil, we articulate methodological contributions from the arts, humanities, and social sciences for more realistic, just, and caring research practices within and about weather in the context of ‘slow violence’ [Nixon, R (2013). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从极端天气事件到“级联脆弱性”:新冠肺炎期间巴西的参与性洪水研究方法
极端天气事件相互交织,与其他极端事件交织在一起,如新冠肺炎大流行、反种族主义抗议、干旱、住房危机、罢工或气候紧急情况,以及由于国家、经济和政治动荡以及长期政策或不作为而增加的脆弱性而导致的更普遍的不足。极端天气事件的影响因持续的社会不公正而加剧,如贫困和结构性种族主义、住房短缺,以及随之而来的对危险地区的非正规和计划外占领,如河岸和以前发生过社会环境灾难的地区。就巴西而言,亚马逊地区持续的森林砍伐(农业综合企业、采矿和非法木材)引发了该地区的干旱和能源短缺,这进一步加剧了全球范围内的脆弱性。在本文中,我们对这些相互关联的情景的主要贡献是描述了为应对新冠肺炎而采取的方法干预措施,并展示了这些变化如何为受试者和研究人员的脆弱性过程提供了新的见解。在一个更大的项目(防水数据)中,我们的更广泛的团队在圣保罗和Acre(巴西)的案例研究区域进行了洪水风险社区研究,我们被迫重新思考我们的方法。我们从洪水事件及其影响的单一性转向承认社会脆弱性的级联条件(由天气、健康、社会和政治条件引起)。在这篇论文中,我们直接解决了当研究人员寻求与洪水易发社区接触时,他们已经遇到的“一连串的脆弱性”。我们开辟了新的途径,根据我们的方法在进行参与性洪水研究方法时遇到的关键挑战,重新考虑公民身份、空间和创新,特别是在2020年3月至2021年11月新冠肺炎大流行的第一阶段。通过在巴西进行的洪水研究,我们阐明了艺术、人文和社会科学在“慢暴力”背景下对天气内部和有关天气的更现实、公正和关爱的研究实践的方法学贡献[Nixon,R(2013)。慢暴力与穷人的环保主义。马萨诸塞州剑桥:哈佛大学UP]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the NMME Rainfall Seasonal Forecasting over Central Africa Are You Watching or Warning? the Role of Comprehension, Warning Lead Time and Prior Experience On Individual Preparation of Tornadic Events “Gentle Disruptions”: A Critical Reflection on Participatory Arts in Expanding the Language System for Meaningful Community Engagement Around Local Climate Adaptation Creating Fire-Adapted Communities Through Recovery: Case Studies from the United States and Australia Planning and Warning as Capacity in Island Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1