Decolonising research with black communities: developing equitable and ethical relationships between academic and community stakeholders

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Relationships and Societies Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1332/204674321X16104823811079
Sadie K. Goddard-Durant, J. Sieunarine, A. Doucet
{"title":"Decolonising research with black communities: developing equitable and ethical relationships between academic and community stakeholders","authors":"Sadie K. Goddard-Durant, J. Sieunarine, A. Doucet","doi":"10.1332/204674321X16104823811079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this International Decade for People of African Descent,1 the spotlight in Canada and in other Western countries has turned to understanding and documenting the lived experiences of black communities. This interest by scholars is perhaps even greater over the last few months with the heightened attention around the world as the Black Lives Matter movements have highlighted anti-black racism in North America. However, reflective of the wider social injustices against black persons, there have been harmful relationships between researchers and black communities historically that has led to black communities mistrusting researchers (Davis et al, 2010; Scharff et al, 2010). These histories have parallels with critiques of the sustained damages of white settler scholarship on, but not with, Indigenous communities where, as Linda Tuhaiwi Smith famously noted that ‘“research” is probably one of the dirtiest words in the indigenous world’s vocabulary’ (Smith, 2012: 1). Moreover, more and more attention has been given to ethical research practices that go beyond simply getting ethical approval from research ethics boards (Tuck and Guishard, 2013; Doucet, 2018a). In particular, Indigenous communities and scholars who conduct research with them, and to a lesser extent black communities and scholars, have been calling for more attention to be paid to the nature and quality of the relationships that researchers are building with communities who have historically been oppressed in research and in society generally (Gibbs, 2001; Semali et al, 2007; Napoli, 2019). Specifically, Families, Relationships and Societies","PeriodicalId":45141,"journal":{"name":"Families Relationships and Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Relationships and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204674321X16104823811079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this International Decade for People of African Descent,1 the spotlight in Canada and in other Western countries has turned to understanding and documenting the lived experiences of black communities. This interest by scholars is perhaps even greater over the last few months with the heightened attention around the world as the Black Lives Matter movements have highlighted anti-black racism in North America. However, reflective of the wider social injustices against black persons, there have been harmful relationships between researchers and black communities historically that has led to black communities mistrusting researchers (Davis et al, 2010; Scharff et al, 2010). These histories have parallels with critiques of the sustained damages of white settler scholarship on, but not with, Indigenous communities where, as Linda Tuhaiwi Smith famously noted that ‘“research” is probably one of the dirtiest words in the indigenous world’s vocabulary’ (Smith, 2012: 1). Moreover, more and more attention has been given to ethical research practices that go beyond simply getting ethical approval from research ethics boards (Tuck and Guishard, 2013; Doucet, 2018a). In particular, Indigenous communities and scholars who conduct research with them, and to a lesser extent black communities and scholars, have been calling for more attention to be paid to the nature and quality of the relationships that researchers are building with communities who have historically been oppressed in research and in society generally (Gibbs, 2001; Semali et al, 2007; Napoli, 2019). Specifically, Families, Relationships and Societies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非殖民化黑人社区研究:在学术和社区利益相关者之间发展公平和道德关系
在非洲人后裔国际十年中,加拿大和其他西方国家的焦点已转向了解和记录黑人社区的生活经历。在过去的几个月里,随着“黑人的命也是命”运动在北美突出了反黑人种族主义,全世界对这一问题的关注度越来越高,学者们的兴趣可能更加浓厚。然而,历史上研究人员和黑人社区之间存在有害的关系,导致黑人社区不信任研究人员,这反映了对黑人更广泛的社会不公正(Davis et al, 2010;Scharff et al, 2010)。这些历史与白人定居者奖学金对土著社区的持续损害的批评有相似之处,而不是与土著社区,正如琳达·图海维·史密斯(Linda Tuhaiwi Smith)著名的指出的那样,“研究”可能是土著世界词汇中最肮脏的词之一”(Smith, 2012: 1)。此外,越来越多的人关注伦理研究实践,而不仅仅是获得研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(Tuck and Guishard, 2013;下去,2018)。特别是,土著社区和与他们一起进行研究的学者,以及较小程度上的黑人社区和学者,一直在呼吁更多地关注研究人员与历史上在研究和社会中普遍受到压迫的社区建立的关系的性质和质量(Gibbs, 2001;Semali et al, 2007;那不勒斯,2019)。具体来说,家庭,关系和社会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Families, Relationships and Societies (FRS) is a vibrant social science journal advancing scholarship and debates in the field of families and relationships. It explores family life, relationships and generational issues across the life course. Bringing together a range of social science perspectives, with a strong policy and practice focus, it is also strongly informed by sociological theory and the latest methodological approaches. The title ''Families, Relationships and Societies'' encompasses the fluidity, complexity and diversity of contemporary social and personal relationships and their need to be understood in the context of different societies and cultures. International and comprehensive in scope, FRS covers a range of theoretical, methodological and substantive issues, from large scale trends, processes of social change and social inequality to the intricacies of family practices. It welcomes scholarship based on theoretical, qualitative or quantitative analysis. High quality research and scholarship is accepted across a wide range of issues. Examples include family policy, changing relationships between personal life, work and employment, shifting meanings of parenting, issues of care and intimacy, the emergence of digital friendship, shifts in transnational sexual relationships, effects of globalising and individualising forces and the expansion of alternative ways of doing family. Encouraging methodological innovation, and seeking to present work on all stages of the life course, the journal welcomes explorations of relationships and families in all their different guises and across different societies.
期刊最新文献
An unbalancing act: gender and parental division in childcare in South Africa Alone and together in domestic space: navigating spatial and conceptual relationship boundaries in Finnish small-scale communes Intimacy, relationality and interdependencies: relationships in families dealing with gambling harms during COVID-19 ‘Family doesn’t have to be mom and dad’: an exploration of the meaning of family for care-experienced young people Complex marital paradigms: divergence between the importance of getting married and being married
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1