Optimization of Random Forest Model for Assessing and Predicting Geological Hazards Susceptibility in Lingyun County

C. Kong, Junzuo Wang, Xiaogang Ma, Yiping Tian, Zhiting Zhang, Kai Xu
{"title":"Optimization of Random Forest Model for Assessing and Predicting Geological Hazards Susceptibility in Lingyun County","authors":"C. Kong, Junzuo Wang, Xiaogang Ma, Yiping Tian, Zhiting Zhang, Kai Xu","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-231323/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The random forest (RF) model is improved by the optimization of unbalanced geological hazards dataset, differentiation of continuous geological hazards evaluation factors, sample similarity calculation, and iterative method for finding optimal random characteristics by calculating out-of-bagger errors. The geological hazards susceptibility evaluation model based on optimized RF (OPRF) was established and used to assess the susceptibility for Lingyun County. Then, ROC curve and field investigation were performed to verify the efficiency for different geological hazards susceptibility assessment models. The AUC values for five models were estimated as 0.766, 0.814, 0.842, 0.846 and 0.934, respectively, which indicated that the prediction accuracy of the OPRF model can be as high as 93.4%. This result demonstrated that the geological hazards susceptibility assessment model based on OPRF has the highest prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the OPRF model could be extended to other regions with similar geological environment backgrounds for geological hazards susceptibility assessment and prediction.","PeriodicalId":72673,"journal":{"name":"Computer science & information technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer science & information technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-231323/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The random forest (RF) model is improved by the optimization of unbalanced geological hazards dataset, differentiation of continuous geological hazards evaluation factors, sample similarity calculation, and iterative method for finding optimal random characteristics by calculating out-of-bagger errors. The geological hazards susceptibility evaluation model based on optimized RF (OPRF) was established and used to assess the susceptibility for Lingyun County. Then, ROC curve and field investigation were performed to verify the efficiency for different geological hazards susceptibility assessment models. The AUC values for five models were estimated as 0.766, 0.814, 0.842, 0.846 and 0.934, respectively, which indicated that the prediction accuracy of the OPRF model can be as high as 93.4%. This result demonstrated that the geological hazards susceptibility assessment model based on OPRF has the highest prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the OPRF model could be extended to other regions with similar geological environment backgrounds for geological hazards susceptibility assessment and prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凌云县地质灾害易感评价与预测的随机森林模型优化
通过优化不平衡地质灾害数据集、区分连续地质灾害评价因子、样本相似性计算以及通过计算袋外误差来寻找最佳随机特征的迭代方法,对随机森林模型进行了改进。建立了基于优化RF(OPRF)的地质灾害易感评价模型,并将其应用于凌云县地质灾害的易感评价。然后,进行ROC曲线和现场调查,以验证不同地质灾害易感性评估模型的有效性。五个模型的AUC值分别估计为0.766、0.814、0.842、0.846和0.934,表明OPRF模型的预测准确率可高达93.4%。这一结果表明,基于OPRF的地质灾害易感性评估模型具有最高的预测准确度。此外,OPRF模型可以扩展到具有相似地质环境背景的其他地区,用于地质灾害易感性评估和预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis. Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Lattice Based Group Key Exchange Protocol in the Standard Model The 5 Dimensions of Problem Solving using DINNA Diagram: Double Ishikawa and Naze Naze Analysis Appraisal Study of Similarity-Based and Embedding-Based Link Prediction Methods on Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1