When Haste Shakes the Scholar’s Pen: Some Scholarly Works on Dagbon after the Regicide of Yaa-Naa Yakubu Andani II, King of Dagbon, Ghana

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIOLOGY African Sociological Review Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.57054/asr.v25i2.3981
M. Bolaji
{"title":"When Haste Shakes the Scholar’s Pen: Some Scholarly Works on Dagbon after the Regicide of Yaa-Naa Yakubu Andani II, King of Dagbon, Ghana","authors":"M. Bolaji","doi":"10.57054/asr.v25i2.3981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until the regicide of Yaa-Naa Yakubu Andani II, the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict – which has been intractable since the colonial era – was largely understudied. Nevertheless, the gruesome “murder” of the king provoked some scholarly interest in the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict. This article reviews significant scholarly works on the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict after the regicide.Also, it explores and interrogates the diverse perspectives which scholars have employed to explain the complexities of the conflict. Furthermore, it critiques some scholars’ uncritical acceptance that the rotational system of succession between the Abudu and Andani has been the tradition and presents the extent of its operation in Dagbon dynastic politics. Additionally, this article unearths some misrepresentations of historical facts and personalities and important dates. This article concludes that since historical truths play crucial roles in prosecuting intractablery to get the historical facts right in documenting them for posterity.","PeriodicalId":43163,"journal":{"name":"African Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/asr.v25i2.3981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until the regicide of Yaa-Naa Yakubu Andani II, the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict – which has been intractable since the colonial era – was largely understudied. Nevertheless, the gruesome “murder” of the king provoked some scholarly interest in the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict. This article reviews significant scholarly works on the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict after the regicide.Also, it explores and interrogates the diverse perspectives which scholars have employed to explain the complexities of the conflict. Furthermore, it critiques some scholars’ uncritical acceptance that the rotational system of succession between the Abudu and Andani has been the tradition and presents the extent of its operation in Dagbon dynastic politics. Additionally, this article unearths some misrepresentations of historical facts and personalities and important dates. This article concludes that since historical truths play crucial roles in prosecuting intractablery to get the historical facts right in documenting them for posterity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当Haste摇动学者的笔:加纳达邦国王Yaa Naa Yakubu Andani II被杀后关于达邦的一些学术著作
在Yaa Naa Yakubu Andani II被杀之前,自殖民时代以来一直难以解决的Dagbon酋长国冲突在很大程度上没有得到充分的研究。然而,对国王的可怕“谋杀”激起了一些学者对达邦酋长国冲突的兴趣。本文综述了关于弑君后达邦酋长国冲突的重要学术著作。此外,它还探讨和质疑了学者们用来解释冲突复杂性的不同视角。此外,它还批评了一些学者不加批判地接受阿布杜和安达尼之间的轮换继承制度是传统,并展示了其在达邦王朝政治中的运作程度。此外,本文还揭露了一些对历史事实、人物和重要日期的歪曲。本文的结论是,由于历史真相在起诉棘手案件中起着至关重要的作用,因此,在为子孙后代记录历史事实时,要正确处理历史事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Devenir un.e résident.e privilégié.e au . Migrations depuis l’Occident, ascensions subversions locales L’État face au phénomène de la migration irrégulière vers l’Europe : à la recherche de la migratoire du Sénégal La protection des réfugiés en Afrique. sile au Sénégal. Le pastoralisme transfrontalier et le droit à la nationalité : quelles perspectives en Afrique Ouest ? Introduction. Post et dé-colonialité dans les champs du droit international et des migrations liées à l’Afrique : comment produire d’autres connaissances?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1