«Fra tvang til dialog» – en kvalitativ casestudie om ny praksis i en psykiatrisk sikkerhetsavdeling [“From coercion to dialogue” – A qualitative case study about a new practice in one forensic mental health unit]

Q3 Psychology Scandinavian Psychologist Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.5.E12
R. Jacobsen, Bengt Karlsson
{"title":"«Fra tvang til dialog» – en kvalitativ casestudie om ny praksis i en psykiatrisk sikkerhetsavdeling [“From coercion to dialogue” – A qualitative case study about a new practice in one forensic mental health unit]","authors":"R. Jacobsen, Bengt Karlsson","doi":"10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.5.E12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A forensic mental health unit in Norway has developed a new treatment approach that emphasizes not only relational and communicative aspects but also reflective processes and socializing. The idea behind this new approach was to facilitate the transformation of standard services characterized by isolation and coercion. The aim of this case study is to explore and describe how a patient and his clinicians experienced this new practice. The method is qualitative, applying a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach with an explorative and descriptive design. Two focus group interviews with the clinicians and one individual interview with a patient were conducted in developing data. Thematic analysis was used and three major themes were identified: 1) New academic positions and practices were developed. Humanity, togetherness, and not being alone were important aspects of this theme. 2) Professionalism took a new form. Reflecting team, thematic violence, and strengthening the patient’s responsibility were main issues. 3) New forms of collaboration were developed. Training in independency, togetherness, and collaboration served as subthemes here. The study indicates opportunities and relevance for a more humanistic and inclusive treatment approach in forensic mental health units, one that focuses on strengthening the user involvement.","PeriodicalId":37593,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.5.E12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A forensic mental health unit in Norway has developed a new treatment approach that emphasizes not only relational and communicative aspects but also reflective processes and socializing. The idea behind this new approach was to facilitate the transformation of standard services characterized by isolation and coercion. The aim of this case study is to explore and describe how a patient and his clinicians experienced this new practice. The method is qualitative, applying a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach with an explorative and descriptive design. Two focus group interviews with the clinicians and one individual interview with a patient were conducted in developing data. Thematic analysis was used and three major themes were identified: 1) New academic positions and practices were developed. Humanity, togetherness, and not being alone were important aspects of this theme. 2) Professionalism took a new form. Reflecting team, thematic violence, and strengthening the patient’s responsibility were main issues. 3) New forms of collaboration were developed. Training in independency, togetherness, and collaboration served as subthemes here. The study indicates opportunities and relevance for a more humanistic and inclusive treatment approach in forensic mental health units, one that focuses on strengthening the user involvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“从强迫到对话”-精神安全部门新做法的定性案例研究[“从胁迫到对话”——一个法医精神卫生部门新做法定性案例研究]
挪威的一个法医心理健康部门开发了一种新的治疗方法,不仅强调关系和沟通方面,还强调反思过程和社交。这种新方法背后的理念是促进以孤立和强制为特征的标准服务的转变。本案例研究的目的是探索和描述患者和他的临床医生是如何体验这种新做法的。该方法是定性的,采用现象学解释学的方法和探索性和描述性的设计。在开发数据时,对临床医生进行了两次焦点小组访谈,对患者进行了一次个人访谈。采用了专题分析,确定了三个主要专题:1)制定了新的学术立场和做法。人性、团结和不孤独是这个主题的重要方面。2) 专业化呈现出一种新的形式。反思团队、主题暴力和加强患者责任是主要问题。3) 开发了新的合作形式。独立性、团结性和协作性方面的培训是这里的次要内容。这项研究表明,在法医心理健康部门采取更人性化和包容性的治疗方法的机会和相关性,这种方法侧重于加强用户的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Psychologist
Scandinavian Psychologist Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psykologisk.no – Scandinavian Psychologist (ISSN 1894-5570) is an open-access journal sponsored by the Norwegian Society for Psychological Science. Instructions to authors are available in English and Norwegian. The word «psykologisk» means psychological. Our aim is to disseminate science-based psychological knowledge to the general public in Nordic countries, and to publish original research and professional articles of interest to the research community and the applied fields. In addition to the broader population, our target audiences are researchers and practitioners in psychology and in related fields, users of psychological services, as well as current and future students.
期刊最新文献
Endringer i samtaleemnene i løpet av psykoterapi: En metode for prosessanalyse med funn fra fire kasusstudier [Topic changes during psychotherapy: A process analysis method with findings from four case studies] Reflexive positioning in identity work: When the shoe does not fit… Reliability, factor structure, and validity of the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) in a general bereaved sample in Norway «Fra kebab til intimitet» – dialogisk autoetnografisk utforsking av vennskap [From kebab to intimacy – A dialogical autoethnographic exploration of friendship] Betydningen av individuelle kjennetegn i møte med laissez-faire-ledelse [The importance of individual characteristics in the face of laissez-faire leadership]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1