Skyline Tensile Forces in Cable Logging

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.5552/CROJFE.2021.722
Omar Mologni, L. Marchi, K. Lyons, S. Grigolato, R. Cavalli, D. Röser
{"title":"Skyline Tensile Forces in Cable Logging","authors":"Omar Mologni, L. Marchi, K. Lyons, S. Grigolato, R. Cavalli, D. Röser","doi":"10.5552/CROJFE.2021.722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skyline tensile forces have been shown to frequently exceed the recommended safety limits during ordinary cable logging operations. Several models for skyline engineering analyses have been proposed. Although skyline tensile forces assume a dynamic behaviour, practical solutions are based on a static approach without consideration of the dynamic nature of the cable systems.The aim of this study was to compare field data of skyline tensile forces with the static calculations derived by dedicated available software such as SkylineXL. To overcome the limitation of static calculation, this work also aimed to simulate the actual response of the tensile fluctuations measured in the real environment by mean of a finite element model (FEM).Field observations of skyline tensile forces included 103 work cycles, recorded over four different cable lines in standing skyline configuration. Payload estimations, carriages positions, and time study of the logging operations were also collected in the field. The ground profiles and the cable line geometries were analysed using digital elevation models. The field data were then used to simulate the work cycles in SkylineXL. The dynamic response of six fully-suspended loads in a single-span cable line was also simulated by a dedicated FEM built through ANSYS®. The observed data and the software calculations were then compared.SkylineXL resulted particularly reliable in the prediction of the actual tensile forces, with RMSE ranging between 7.5 and 13.5 KN, linked to an average CV(RMSE) of 7.24%. The reliability in predicting the peak tensile forces was lower, reporting CV(RMSE) of 10.12%, but still not likely resulting in a safety or performance problem. If properly set-up and used, thus, SkylineXL could be considered appropriate for operational and practical purposes. This work, however, showed that finite element models could be successfully used for detailed analysis and simulation of the skyline tensile forces, including the dynamic oscillations due to the motion of the carriage and payload along the cable line. Further developments of this technique could also lead to the physical simulation and analysis of the log-to-ground interaction and the investigation of the breakout force during lateral skidding.","PeriodicalId":55204,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"227-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5552/CROJFE.2021.722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Skyline tensile forces have been shown to frequently exceed the recommended safety limits during ordinary cable logging operations. Several models for skyline engineering analyses have been proposed. Although skyline tensile forces assume a dynamic behaviour, practical solutions are based on a static approach without consideration of the dynamic nature of the cable systems.The aim of this study was to compare field data of skyline tensile forces with the static calculations derived by dedicated available software such as SkylineXL. To overcome the limitation of static calculation, this work also aimed to simulate the actual response of the tensile fluctuations measured in the real environment by mean of a finite element model (FEM).Field observations of skyline tensile forces included 103 work cycles, recorded over four different cable lines in standing skyline configuration. Payload estimations, carriages positions, and time study of the logging operations were also collected in the field. The ground profiles and the cable line geometries were analysed using digital elevation models. The field data were then used to simulate the work cycles in SkylineXL. The dynamic response of six fully-suspended loads in a single-span cable line was also simulated by a dedicated FEM built through ANSYS®. The observed data and the software calculations were then compared.SkylineXL resulted particularly reliable in the prediction of the actual tensile forces, with RMSE ranging between 7.5 and 13.5 KN, linked to an average CV(RMSE) of 7.24%. The reliability in predicting the peak tensile forces was lower, reporting CV(RMSE) of 10.12%, but still not likely resulting in a safety or performance problem. If properly set-up and used, thus, SkylineXL could be considered appropriate for operational and practical purposes. This work, however, showed that finite element models could be successfully used for detailed analysis and simulation of the skyline tensile forces, including the dynamic oscillations due to the motion of the carriage and payload along the cable line. Further developments of this technique could also lead to the physical simulation and analysis of the log-to-ground interaction and the investigation of the breakout force during lateral skidding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电缆测井中的Skyline拉力
在普通电缆测井作业中,Skyline的拉力经常超过推荐的安全限制。提出了几种用于天际线工程分析的模型。虽然天际线拉力假设为动态行为,但实际的解决方案是基于静态方法,而不考虑索系统的动态特性。本研究的目的是将天际线拉力的现场数据与由SkylineXL等专用可用软件得出的静态计算结果进行比较。为了克服静态计算的局限性,本工作还旨在通过有限元模型(FEM)模拟在真实环境中测量的拉伸波动的实际响应。天际线拉伸力的现场观测包括103个工作周期,记录在四种不同的电缆线在站立的天际线配置。在现场还收集了有效载荷估计、车厢位置和测井作业时间研究。使用数字高程模型分析了地面轮廓和电缆线的几何形状。然后使用现场数据来模拟SkylineXL中的工作周期。利用ANSYS®建立的专用有限元软件,模拟了单跨缆索线路中6个全悬载的动力响应。然后将观测数据与软件计算结果进行比较。SkylineXL对实际拉伸力的预测结果特别可靠,RMSE范围在7.5到13.5 KN之间,平均CV(RMSE)为7.24%。预测峰值拉力的可靠性较低,报告CV(RMSE)为10.12%,但仍然不太可能导致安全或性能问题。因此,如果正确设置和使用,SkylineXL可以被认为适用于操作和实际目的。然而,这项工作表明,有限元模型可以成功地用于详细分析和模拟天际线张力,包括由于车厢和有效载荷沿电缆线运动而产生的动态振荡。该技术的进一步发展也可能导致原木与地面相互作用的物理模拟和分析,以及横向滑动过程中破裂力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering (CROJFE) is a refereed journal distributed internationally, publishing original research articles concerning forest engineering, both theoretical and empirical. The journal covers all aspects of forest engineering research, ranging from basic to applied subjects. In addition to research articles, preliminary research notes and subject reviews are published. Journal Subjects and Fields: -Harvesting systems and technologies- Forest biomass and carbon sequestration- Forest road network planning, management and construction- System organization and forest operations- IT technologies and remote sensing- Engineering in urban forestry- Vehicle/machine design and evaluation- Modelling and sustainable management- Eco-efficient technologies in forestry- Ergonomics and work safety
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Simulators into a Training Curriculum for Forestry Equipment Operators Comparing Different Replacement Policies for Logging Machines in Brazil Effects of Boom-Corridor and Selective Thinnings on Harvester Productivity in Dense Small Diameter Pyrenean Oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) Coppices in Spain Soil Characteristics in Oak Lowland Stand Assessment of Tractor Tires Used in Forest Conditions in Terms of Traction Performance and Impact on Ground
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1