Assessing the bets advertised on Twitter by gambling operators and gambling affiliates – an observational study incorporating simulation data to measure bet success

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Gambling Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/14459795.2022.2114527
Scott Houghton, M. Moss
{"title":"Assessing the bets advertised on Twitter by gambling operators and gambling affiliates – an observational study incorporating simulation data to measure bet success","authors":"Scott Houghton, M. Moss","doi":"10.1080/14459795.2022.2114527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study assessed bets advertised on Twitter by betting operators and affiliates, as well as their success. Bets advertised by 10 Twitter accounts were tracked over two weeks. Information recorded included: bet odds, bet type, number of times advertised, and bet success. The success of bets was calculated based upon placing equal stakes on each bet and running four sets of 10,000 simulations, each of an increasing number of randomly chosen bets with fixed bet stake per bet from those recorded. Both operators and affiliates advertised around 140 bets per day at average decimal odds of 6.0, however affiliates posted each bet three-times more than operators. Only one-in-five bets advertised won. Affiliate bets led to a 12% loss of original stakes, whilst operator bets led to a 20% loss. Only 30% of 10,000 simulations of 14 randomly chosen bets led to profit, decreasing to 19% when the number of bets included in the simulation increased to 140. Findings raise concerns about the volume of bets advertised on social media with large expected losses. Simulation data demonstrates how the chance of making a profit decreases the more advertised bets are bet upon. Future research should explore bettors’ responses to such marketing.","PeriodicalId":47301,"journal":{"name":"International Gambling Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"225 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Gambling Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2114527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study assessed bets advertised on Twitter by betting operators and affiliates, as well as their success. Bets advertised by 10 Twitter accounts were tracked over two weeks. Information recorded included: bet odds, bet type, number of times advertised, and bet success. The success of bets was calculated based upon placing equal stakes on each bet and running four sets of 10,000 simulations, each of an increasing number of randomly chosen bets with fixed bet stake per bet from those recorded. Both operators and affiliates advertised around 140 bets per day at average decimal odds of 6.0, however affiliates posted each bet three-times more than operators. Only one-in-five bets advertised won. Affiliate bets led to a 12% loss of original stakes, whilst operator bets led to a 20% loss. Only 30% of 10,000 simulations of 14 randomly chosen bets led to profit, decreasing to 19% when the number of bets included in the simulation increased to 140. Findings raise concerns about the volume of bets advertised on social media with large expected losses. Simulation data demonstrates how the chance of making a profit decreases the more advertised bets are bet upon. Future research should explore bettors’ responses to such marketing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估博彩运营商和博彩附属公司在推特上发布的投注广告——一项结合模拟数据来衡量投注成功率的观察性研究
摘要本研究评估了博彩运营商和附属公司在推特上发布的博彩广告及其成功率。10个推特账户发布的投注广告在两周内被追踪。记录的信息包括:投注赔率、投注类型、广告次数和投注成功率。赌注的成功率是基于在每次赌注上下注相等,并运行四组10000次模拟来计算的,每一组模拟都是从记录的赌注中随机选择的,每次赌注固定。运营商和附属公司每天都以6.0的平均小数赔率发布约140次投注广告,但附属公司发布的每次投注是运营商的三倍。广告中只有五分之一的赌注赢了。关联方投注导致原始赌注损失12%,而运营商投注导致损失20%。在对14个随机选择的赌注进行的10000次模拟中,只有30%产生了利润,当模拟中包括的赌注数量增加到140时,利润下降到19%。调查结果引发了人们对社交媒体上预计损失巨大的赌注数量的担忧。模拟数据表明,广告中的赌注越多,盈利的机会就越小。未来的研究应该探索投注者对这种营销的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Illegal video game loot boxes with transferable content on steam: a longitudinal study on their presence and non-compliance with and non-enforcement of gambling law Between anti-gambling and masculinity: mahjong playing among Japanese gay men Prognostic Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Pattern and other Clinical Biomarkers in Patients with Stroke Admitted in a Tertiary Hospital in Cebu City from 2015-2022. Balancing conflicting interests: stakeholders’ interpretations of ‘moderation’ in Swedish gambling advertising legislation The effect of exclusion on subjective well-being indicators and problem gambling in Swiss casinos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1