Jane Hardie’s foreword provides a history of the Fisher Collection, draws attention to the plurality of Spanish liturgical traditions, and includes short descriptions of the four processionals and the contents of the book. DavidAndrés, in his preface and intro-
{"title":"Jane Hardie’s foreword provides a history of the Fisher Collection, draws attention to the plurality of Spanish liturgical traditions, and includes short descriptions of the four processionals and the contents of the book. DavidAndrés, in his preface and intro-","authors":"Barbara Haggh-Huglo","doi":"10.1017/S0961137118000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"line. When I discussed this, the one case that puzzled me was the post-communion of Du Fay’s Mass Sancti Iacobi, unique to Bologna Q15, which explicitly states that the missing voice is a fourth below the discantus but which again works musically far better if it is a third above the tenor, with a fifth at cadences. Planchart implicity accepts this: at least, he states (p. 573) that the post-communion, as he and Besseler reconstruct it, has far more jarring dissonances than anything else of Du Fay. But it was for me a relevation to read (pp. 571–2) that there is a plain textual problem with the Alleluia of that Mass, which demonstrably has the text all in the wrong places for that movement, also unique to Bologna Q15. That is to say that in some respects Bologna Q15 is rather less authoritative than we had once thought for the music of Du Fay; and I think we can perhaps trust our musical instincts rather more in suggesting that the written instructions for the post-communion may not be authentic. Briefly, there is plenty more to discuss about Du Fay and his music.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":"28 1","pages":"92 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137118000141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137118000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
line. When I discussed this, the one case that puzzled me was the post-communion of Du Fay’s Mass Sancti Iacobi, unique to Bologna Q15, which explicitly states that the missing voice is a fourth below the discantus but which again works musically far better if it is a third above the tenor, with a fifth at cadences. Planchart implicity accepts this: at least, he states (p. 573) that the post-communion, as he and Besseler reconstruct it, has far more jarring dissonances than anything else of Du Fay. But it was for me a relevation to read (pp. 571–2) that there is a plain textual problem with the Alleluia of that Mass, which demonstrably has the text all in the wrong places for that movement, also unique to Bologna Q15. That is to say that in some respects Bologna Q15 is rather less authoritative than we had once thought for the music of Du Fay; and I think we can perhaps trust our musical instincts rather more in suggesting that the written instructions for the post-communion may not be authentic. Briefly, there is plenty more to discuss about Du Fay and his music.
线当我讨论这一点时,令我困惑的一个案例是杜菲的《弥撒圣歌》(Mass Sancti Iacobi)的后期交流,这是博洛尼亚Q15独有的作品,它明确指出,缺失的声音比discantus低四分之一,但如果它比男高音高三分之一,在节奏上有五分之一,那么它的音乐效果会好得多。平面图的隐含性接受了这一点:至少,他说(第573页),正如他和贝塞勒重建的那样,后圣餐比杜法的任何其他东西都有更不和谐的不和谐。但对我来说,这是一种重新认识(第571-2页),即弥撒中的阿勒路亚有一个明显的文本问题,它显然把文本放在了错误的地方,这也是博洛尼亚Q15独有的。也就是说,在某些方面,博洛尼亚Q15的权威性不如我们曾经认为的杜菲的音乐;我认为我们也许可以更相信我们的音乐本能,认为圣餐后的书面指示可能不真实。简言之,关于杜菲和他的音乐还有很多值得讨论的地方。
期刊介绍:
Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.