Restructuring the European VAT tax system: advantages and disadvantages of the adoption of a single-rate model - a study based on the Portuguese case

Ricardo de Moraes e Soares, João Ricardo Catarino
{"title":"Restructuring the European VAT tax system: advantages and disadvantages of the adoption of a single-rate model - a study based on the Portuguese case","authors":"Ricardo de Moraes e Soares, João Ricardo Catarino","doi":"10.17979/ejge.2019.8.2.5478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The common VAT system adopted by EU member states comprises a set of various rates, which differentiate the goods and services subject to this tax. However, from a technical and management point of view, it would be preferable to adopt a single tax rate as it reduces distortions and facilitates tax compliance and management. This research seeks to analyse the benefits and disadvantages of adopting a single VAT as a means of simplifying the European VAT model. It takes Portugal as a case study. The main objective of this research is to contribute to the academic debate around the theme of the single rate of VAT versus differentiated rates, through the achievement of a series of analyses and statistical tests to revenues and percentages of GDP that they correspond, in the three scenarios considered in the study: differentiated rates, single rate of 17% and single rate of 21%.In the empirical part, hypotheses were developed, the effects on tax revenue of a differential collection system were analyzed and compared to a possible single rate regime on consumption to verify which one would be more efficient. data comparison permits to verify that the estimated revenue of the single rate of VAT is higher than the values ​​obtained by the system of differentiated rates, in any of the proposed models (17% or 21%). The results of this research are valid for all countries that adopt VAT or general tax transactions.","PeriodicalId":37945,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Government and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2019.8.2.5478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The common VAT system adopted by EU member states comprises a set of various rates, which differentiate the goods and services subject to this tax. However, from a technical and management point of view, it would be preferable to adopt a single tax rate as it reduces distortions and facilitates tax compliance and management. This research seeks to analyse the benefits and disadvantages of adopting a single VAT as a means of simplifying the European VAT model. It takes Portugal as a case study. The main objective of this research is to contribute to the academic debate around the theme of the single rate of VAT versus differentiated rates, through the achievement of a series of analyses and statistical tests to revenues and percentages of GDP that they correspond, in the three scenarios considered in the study: differentiated rates, single rate of 17% and single rate of 21%.In the empirical part, hypotheses were developed, the effects on tax revenue of a differential collection system were analyzed and compared to a possible single rate regime on consumption to verify which one would be more efficient. data comparison permits to verify that the estimated revenue of the single rate of VAT is higher than the values ​​obtained by the system of differentiated rates, in any of the proposed models (17% or 21%). The results of this research are valid for all countries that adopt VAT or general tax transactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲增值税税制改革:采用单一税率模式的利弊——基于葡萄牙案例的研究
欧盟成员国采用的共同增值税制度包括一套不同的税率,以区分受此税影响的商品和服务。但是,从技术和管理的角度来看,最好采用单一税率,因为它可以减少扭曲现象,并促进税收遵守和管理。本研究旨在分析采用单一增值税作为简化欧洲增值税模式的手段的好处和缺点。它以葡萄牙为例进行研究。本研究的主要目的是促进围绕增值税单一税率与差异税率这一主题的学术辩论,通过在研究中考虑的三种情况下,对其对应的收入和GDP百分比进行一系列分析和统计测试:差异税率,单一税率为17%和单一税率为21%。在实证部分,提出了假设,分析了差别征税制度对税收的影响,并将其与可能的单一税率制度对消费的影响进行了比较,以验证哪一种制度更有效。数据比较可以验证,在任何提议的模型(17%或21%)中,单一税率增值税的估计收入高于差别税率制度获得的价值。本研究结果适用于所有采用增值税或一般税收交易的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Government and Economics
European Journal of Government and Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE) is an international academic journal for peer reviewed research on all aspects of government and economics. EJGE is particularly interested in current issues regarding the interrelationship between the fields of government and economics, from the influence of government on the economy (economic policy) to economic explanations of government (public choice). It is also particularly interested in questions directly or indirectly related to Europe.
期刊最新文献
Democracy, governance, and environmental policy effectiveness: a cross-country analysis with Sustainable Governance Indicators Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales Exploring citizen participation in fiscal control: insights from Manizales, Colombia Tourism, growth, and carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa: a balancing act Impact of government quality on post-COVID subjective well-being in Pakistan: the mediating role of financial stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1