As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? The role of parental versus own education for openness towards globalisation

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1177/14651165221140230
S. Kunst, Theresa Kuhn, H. G. van de Werfhorst
{"title":"As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? The role of parental versus own education for openness towards globalisation","authors":"S. Kunst, Theresa Kuhn, H. G. van de Werfhorst","doi":"10.1177/14651165221140230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizens with higher levels of education are consistently found to be more open to immigration and European integration than those with less education. However, the literature has neglected the issue of whether educational divides in anti-globalisation sentiment result from people's own educational attainment or whether they are a consequence of deep-rooted positions of disadvantage across generations. In this article, we address the question to what extent the attitudes towards globalisation of intergenerationally mobile citizens, that is, those who obtain a different educational outcome than one's parents, adapt to the newly acquired social position or remain attached to the parental milieu. We apply diagonal reference models to study the influence of one's own and parental education level on attitudes to globalisation in 26 European countries using the European Social Survey between 2008 and 2018. Our results indicate that while mobile citizens adjust their attitudes to the achieved education level, there remains an enduring influence of the education level of origin. In addition, we find that the importance of parental educational attainment does not depend on the social fluidity between education levels within countries. Consequently, this study has important implications for studying political socialisation and the future of the educational divide over globalisation.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"264 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Union Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221140230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Citizens with higher levels of education are consistently found to be more open to immigration and European integration than those with less education. However, the literature has neglected the issue of whether educational divides in anti-globalisation sentiment result from people's own educational attainment or whether they are a consequence of deep-rooted positions of disadvantage across generations. In this article, we address the question to what extent the attitudes towards globalisation of intergenerationally mobile citizens, that is, those who obtain a different educational outcome than one's parents, adapt to the newly acquired social position or remain attached to the parental milieu. We apply diagonal reference models to study the influence of one's own and parental education level on attitudes to globalisation in 26 European countries using the European Social Survey between 2008 and 2018. Our results indicate that while mobile citizens adjust their attitudes to the achieved education level, there remains an enduring influence of the education level of origin. In addition, we find that the importance of parental educational attainment does not depend on the social fluidity between education levels within countries. Consequently, this study has important implications for studying political socialisation and the future of the educational divide over globalisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树枝弯了,树就倾斜了?父母教育与自身教育在全球化开放中的作用
与受教育程度较低的公民相比,受教育程度较高的公民始终对移民和欧洲一体化持更开放的态度。然而,这些文献忽视了反全球化情绪中的教育差异是由人们自己的教育程度造成的,还是由几代人之间根深蒂固的劣势地位造成的。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了代际流动公民对全球化的态度在多大程度上的问题,即那些获得与父母不同的教育成果,适应新获得的社会地位或仍然依附于父母环境的人。我们采用对角线参考模型,利用2008年至2018年的欧洲社会调查,研究了26个欧洲国家的个人和父母的教育水平对全球化态度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,虽然流动公民会调整他们对已达到的教育水平的态度,但原籍教育水平仍然存在持久的影响。此外,我们发现父母受教育程度的重要性并不取决于国家内部教育水平之间的社会流动性。因此,这项研究对研究政治社会化和全球化教育鸿沟的未来具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Union Politics
European Union Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European Union Politics is an international academic journal for advanced peer-reviewed research and scholarship on all aspects of the process of government, politics and policy in the European Union. It aims to stimulate debate and provide a forum to bridge the theoretical and empirical analysis on the political unification of Europe. It represents no particular school or approach, nor is it wedded to any particular methodology. In particular it welcomes articles that offer a new theoretical argument, analyze original data in a novel fashion or present an innovative methodological approach. The Editors invite submissions from all sub-fields of contemporary political science, including international relations, comparative politics, public administration, public policy and political theory.
期刊最新文献
The Eurodisappointed: On the disenchantment with the EU's limited response to democratic backsliding Europe around the corner? How border proximity and quality of government explains European identity Free to move, reluctant to share: Unequal opposition to transnational rights under the EU's free movement principle The EU Commission: Supplying enforcement and demanding compliance Mission partly accomplished: European Union Politics at 25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1