The Dynamics of University-Industry Interactions in Peripheral Contexts: Evidence from Brazil

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS Foresight and STI Governance Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.59.69
Paulo Aparecido-Tomaz, B. Fischer, D. Meissner, Paola Rücker Schaeffer
{"title":"The Dynamics of University-Industry Interactions in Peripheral Contexts: Evidence from Brazil","authors":"Paulo Aparecido-Tomaz, B. Fischer, D. Meissner, Paola Rücker Schaeffer","doi":"10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.59.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at addressing the factors that constrain the flow of knowledge between universities and industry when these players are embedded in peripheral contexts. A multiple-case study was carried out in order to describe and understand the limitations of universities as agents of innovation in peripheral ecosystems. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the coordinators of five Technological Innovation Centers (entities equivalent to TTO) of all Federal Institutes (five) located in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The findings show that there are constraining elements associated with the socioeconomic environment (the lack of economic dynamism and low absorptive capacity at firms), with universities (a lack of infrastructure, resources, and available researchers) and intermediary agents (the lack of staff and institutional legitimacy). The observed conditions lead to challenges in fostering dense knowledge flows, thus perpetuating regional economic asymmetries and hindering the institutional evolution of academic institutions toward the notion of entrepreneurial universities. Our research contributes to literature by addressing in detail the limitations of universities in spurring dense innovation networks in laggard ecosystems. Instead, more complex co-evolutionary processes seem to be at play – and “silver bullet” policies are likely to offer disappointing results.","PeriodicalId":45026,"journal":{"name":"Foresight and STI Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foresight and STI Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.59.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aims at addressing the factors that constrain the flow of knowledge between universities and industry when these players are embedded in peripheral contexts. A multiple-case study was carried out in order to describe and understand the limitations of universities as agents of innovation in peripheral ecosystems. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the coordinators of five Technological Innovation Centers (entities equivalent to TTO) of all Federal Institutes (five) located in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The findings show that there are constraining elements associated with the socioeconomic environment (the lack of economic dynamism and low absorptive capacity at firms), with universities (a lack of infrastructure, resources, and available researchers) and intermediary agents (the lack of staff and institutional legitimacy). The observed conditions lead to challenges in fostering dense knowledge flows, thus perpetuating regional economic asymmetries and hindering the institutional evolution of academic institutions toward the notion of entrepreneurial universities. Our research contributes to literature by addressing in detail the limitations of universities in spurring dense innovation networks in laggard ecosystems. Instead, more complex co-evolutionary processes seem to be at play – and “silver bullet” policies are likely to offer disappointing results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周边环境下大学-产业互动的动态:来自巴西的证据
这项研究旨在解决当这些参与者嵌入外围环境时,限制大学和行业之间知识流动的因素。为了描述和理解大学作为外围生态系统创新推动者的局限性,进行了一项多案例研究。对位于巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的所有联邦研究院(五个)的五个技术创新中心(相当于TTO的实体)的协调员进行了22次半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,存在与社会经济环境(缺乏经济活力和企业吸收能力低)、大学(缺乏基础设施、资源和可用的研究人员)和中介机构(缺乏员工和机构合法性)相关的制约因素。观察到的条件导致了在促进密集的知识流动方面的挑战,从而使区域经济不对称永久化,并阻碍了学术机构向创业大学概念的制度演变。我们的研究通过详细解决大学在落后生态系统中刺激密集创新网络的局限性,为文献做出了贡献。相反,更复杂的协同进化过程似乎正在发挥作用——“银弹”政策可能会带来令人失望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Foresight and STI Governance is an international interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open-access journal. It publishes original research articles, offering new theoretical insights and practical knowledge related to the following areas: strategic planning, science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy, foresight and other future studies. The journal considers articles on the following themes: - Foresight methods and best practices; - Long-term social and economic priorities for strategic planning and policy making; - Innovation strategies at the national, regional, sectoral, and corporate levels; - The development of National Innovation Systems; - The analysis of the innovation lifecycle from idea to the market; - Technological trends, breakthroughs, and grand challenges; - Technological changes and their implications for economy, policy-making, and society; - Corporate innovation management; - Human capital in STI.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for the New Paradigm of Business: The Metaverse The Impact of Consumer Culture on Innovation Adoption in Developing Countries Modeling Challenges for Building Technological Capacities to Achieve Sustainability in the Food Industry Cybersecurity and Strategic Management Assessment of Interorganizational Technology Transfer Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1