Flexible endoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for localising impacted pharyngeal foreign bodies in emergency department: A randomised cross-over manikin pilot study

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1177/10249079211033373
Chi-Kit Sin, Bun Young
{"title":"Flexible endoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for localising impacted pharyngeal foreign bodies in emergency department: A randomised cross-over manikin pilot study","authors":"Chi-Kit Sin, Bun Young","doi":"10.1177/10249079211033373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Direct laryngoscopy is often poorly tolerated in patients with foreign body ingestion. The use of flexible endoscopes, which are reported to be better tolerated, was described. However, studies on endoscopy usage by emergency physicians are lacking. Objective: This study evaluates whether using a bronchoscope is as effective as the direct laryngoscopy for localising pharyngeal foreign bodies by emergency physicians. Methods: This was a randomised cross-over manikin study conducted on 32 emergency physicians. Four foreign bodies were placed at the oropharynx, vallecula, arytenoid and post-cricoid area of a manikin. Participants, being randomised into two groups, examined the pharynx with a bronchoscope and a direct laryngoscope in designated orders. The primary outcome was the complete visualisation rate defined as visualising all the four foreign bodies within the time limit. Secondary outcomes included participants-rated difficulty scores, device preferences, the time needed for complete visualisation and cumulative success rates. Results: Complete visualisation rate was significantly higher using the bronchoscope (93.8%) than the direct laryngoscope (62.5%) p = 0.02. The overall difficulty score was lower using the bronchoscope (median 4, interquartile range: 3–5) than the direct laryngoscope (median 6, interquartile range: 5–8), p < 0.001. The bronchoscope was the preferred method for overall examination (71.9%) over the direct laryngoscope (28.1%), p = 0.001. There were no significant differences in times needed for complete examination for the bronchoscope (median 73.6 s, interquartile range: 54.7–97.7 s) and the direct laryngoscope (median 82.2 s, interquartile range: 40.1–120 s), p = 0.9, and cumulative success rates, p = 0.081. Conclusion: The bronchoscope was associated with an increased complete visualisation rate and was the easier and preferred method for pharyngeal examination.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10249079211033373","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10249079211033373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Direct laryngoscopy is often poorly tolerated in patients with foreign body ingestion. The use of flexible endoscopes, which are reported to be better tolerated, was described. However, studies on endoscopy usage by emergency physicians are lacking. Objective: This study evaluates whether using a bronchoscope is as effective as the direct laryngoscopy for localising pharyngeal foreign bodies by emergency physicians. Methods: This was a randomised cross-over manikin study conducted on 32 emergency physicians. Four foreign bodies were placed at the oropharynx, vallecula, arytenoid and post-cricoid area of a manikin. Participants, being randomised into two groups, examined the pharynx with a bronchoscope and a direct laryngoscope in designated orders. The primary outcome was the complete visualisation rate defined as visualising all the four foreign bodies within the time limit. Secondary outcomes included participants-rated difficulty scores, device preferences, the time needed for complete visualisation and cumulative success rates. Results: Complete visualisation rate was significantly higher using the bronchoscope (93.8%) than the direct laryngoscope (62.5%) p = 0.02. The overall difficulty score was lower using the bronchoscope (median 4, interquartile range: 3–5) than the direct laryngoscope (median 6, interquartile range: 5–8), p < 0.001. The bronchoscope was the preferred method for overall examination (71.9%) over the direct laryngoscope (28.1%), p = 0.001. There were no significant differences in times needed for complete examination for the bronchoscope (median 73.6 s, interquartile range: 54.7–97.7 s) and the direct laryngoscope (median 82.2 s, interquartile range: 40.1–120 s), p = 0.9, and cumulative success rates, p = 0.081. Conclusion: The bronchoscope was associated with an increased complete visualisation rate and was the easier and preferred method for pharyngeal examination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科应用柔性内窥镜与直接喉镜定位咽部异物:一项随机交叉人体模型的初步研究
背景:直接喉镜检查在异物摄入患者中通常耐受性较差。据报道,柔性内窥镜的使用具有更好的耐受性。然而,关于急诊医生使用内窥镜检查的研究却很少。目的:本研究评估急诊医生使用支气管镜定位咽部异物是否与直接喉镜检查一样有效。方法:这是一项对32名急诊医生进行的随机交叉人体模型研究。将四个异物放置在人体模型的口咽、vallecula、杓状突和环状突后区域。参与者被随机分为两组,按照指定的顺序用支气管镜和直接喉镜检查咽部。主要结果是完全可视化率,定义为在时限内可视化所有四个异物。次要结果包括参与者的难度评分、设备偏好、完成可视化所需的时间和累积成功率。结果:支气管镜的完全可视化率(93.8%)明显高于直接喉镜(62.5%) = 0.02.使用支气管镜(中位数4,四分位间距:3-5)的总体难度得分低于直接喉镜(中位数6,四分位数间距:5-8),p < 0.001。支气管镜是进行全面检查的首选方法(71.9%),而不是直接喉镜(28.1%),p = 0.001。支气管镜(中位数73.6 s,四分位间距:54.7–97.7 s)和直接喉镜(中位数82.2 s,四分位间距:40.1–120 s)的完全检查所需时间没有显著差异,p = 0.9,累积成功率,p = 结论:支气管镜检查可提高咽部的完全显像率,是一种更容易和首选的检查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical ventilation management and airway pressure release ventilation practice in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey of intensive care unit clinicians in mainland China Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments Questionnaire survey on point‐of‐care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest among emergency physicians in Hong Kong Burnout in emergency physicians in Hong Kong—A cross‐sectional study on its prevalence, associated factors, and impact Factors for predicting 28‐day mortality in older patients with suspected of having sepsis in the emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1