Who Feels the Bern? An Analysis of Support for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic Primary

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Politics Research Pub Date : 2022-07-02 DOI:10.1177/1532673X221112390
Christopher Altamura, B. Oliver
{"title":"Who Feels the Bern? An Analysis of Support for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic Primary","authors":"Christopher Altamura, B. Oliver","doi":"10.1177/1532673X221112390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers remain divided over the cause of Bernie Sanders’ strong appeal in recent Democratic primaries, alternately positing identity or ideology as decisive drivers of Sanders support. Using data from 2020 Nationscape, we conduct linear probability models that show how identity, ideology, and their interaction all explain Sanders support. Demographically, we find that Sanders voters are disproportionately young, Hispanic, and Independent. Sanders voters also differ significantly from other Democratic primary voters across several ideology variables, and are especially supportive of policies that were central to Sanders’ campaign, such as providing government-run health insurance to all Americans. Finally, we demonstrate that age cohort, the most important predictor of Sanders support, has an effect that is highly dependent upon key ideology variables. Overall, those who did not vote for Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary are quite demographically and ideologically distinct from those voters that “felt the Bern.”","PeriodicalId":51482,"journal":{"name":"American Politics Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"643 - 656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221112390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers remain divided over the cause of Bernie Sanders’ strong appeal in recent Democratic primaries, alternately positing identity or ideology as decisive drivers of Sanders support. Using data from 2020 Nationscape, we conduct linear probability models that show how identity, ideology, and their interaction all explain Sanders support. Demographically, we find that Sanders voters are disproportionately young, Hispanic, and Independent. Sanders voters also differ significantly from other Democratic primary voters across several ideology variables, and are especially supportive of policies that were central to Sanders’ campaign, such as providing government-run health insurance to all Americans. Finally, we demonstrate that age cohort, the most important predictor of Sanders support, has an effect that is highly dependent upon key ideology variables. Overall, those who did not vote for Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary are quite demographically and ideologically distinct from those voters that “felt the Bern.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁感受到了伯尔尼?2020年民主党初选对伯尼·桑德斯的支持分析
对于伯尼·桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)在最近的民主党初选中获得强烈吸引力的原因,研究人员仍然存在分歧,有人认为身份或意识形态是支持桑德斯的决定性因素。使用2020年Nationscape的数据,我们进行了线性概率模型,显示身份、意识形态及其相互作用如何解释桑德斯的支持。从人口统计学上看,我们发现桑德斯的选民大多是年轻人、西班牙裔和无党派人士。桑德斯的选民在几个意识形态变量上也与其他民主党初选选民有很大不同,他们尤其支持桑德斯竞选的核心政策,比如向所有美国人提供政府运营的医疗保险。最后,我们证明,年龄队列是桑德斯支持率最重要的预测指标,其影响高度依赖于关键的意识形态变量。总的来说,那些在2020年民主党初选中没有投票给桑德斯的人在人口统计学和意识形态上与那些“感受到伯尔尼”的选民截然不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Politics Research
American Politics Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The purpose of Amercian Politics Research is to promote and disseminate high-quality research in all areas of American politics, including local, state, and national. American Politics Research will publish significant studies concerning American political behavior, political parties, public opinion, legislative behavior, courts and the legal process, executive and administrative politics, public policy, and all other topics appropriate to our understanding of American government and politics. Manuscripts from all social science disciplines are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
When Do Voters Punish Politicians Who Violate Democratic Norms? Access or Experience? Determinants of Distrust in US Elections More Choices, More Problems? Ranked Choice Voting Errors in New York City How College Students React to COVID Vaccine PSAs: An Experimental Investigation Do Violations of Democratic Norms Change Political Attitudes? Evidence From the January 6th Insurrection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1