Teacher-Tool Relationship of Maldivian ESL Teachers: A Multiple Case Study

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International and Comparative Education Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.14425/jice.2020.9.1.0704
Aishath Wadheefa, M. Tee
{"title":"Teacher-Tool Relationship of Maldivian ESL Teachers: A Multiple Case Study","authors":"Aishath Wadheefa, M. Tee","doi":"10.14425/jice.2020.9.1.0704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major curriculum reform was implemented in Maldives in 2015. Little is known about how the new curriculum has been used and implemented in classroom teaching. This qualitative multiple-case study aims to examine the teacher-tool relationship of six teachers teaching sixth grade English and the factors that shape the teacher-tool relationship. The teachers were situated in four schools with distinct contexts – a densely populated urban context, a sparsely populated island with multi-grade classrooms, an island dependent on fishing and an island dependent on tourism. Data collected include three video-recorded observations of each teacher as well as post and pre-observation interviews. Brown’s Design Capacity for Enactment Framework (DCEF) was used as a basis to see whether teachers offload, adapt or improvise the curriculum. In addition, an analysis of the descriptive data, across and within the cases was done to identify factors that shape the way teachers use the curriculum. The analysis revealed that teachers use the curriculum in distinctive ways and included multiple layers of offloading, adapting, improvising and omitting. The way teachers use the curriculum varies from one teacher to another, from one lesson to another, and from one activity to another. Curriculum tool features, individual characteristics as well as the island context played significant roles in shaping how teachers use the curriculum in their teaching. The results of the study can provide curriculum developers with a different perspective in designing curriculum tools, particularly to create flexible affordances within the curriculum to allow for differing teacher and locational characteristics.","PeriodicalId":42500,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International and Comparative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International and Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2020.9.1.0704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A major curriculum reform was implemented in Maldives in 2015. Little is known about how the new curriculum has been used and implemented in classroom teaching. This qualitative multiple-case study aims to examine the teacher-tool relationship of six teachers teaching sixth grade English and the factors that shape the teacher-tool relationship. The teachers were situated in four schools with distinct contexts – a densely populated urban context, a sparsely populated island with multi-grade classrooms, an island dependent on fishing and an island dependent on tourism. Data collected include three video-recorded observations of each teacher as well as post and pre-observation interviews. Brown’s Design Capacity for Enactment Framework (DCEF) was used as a basis to see whether teachers offload, adapt or improvise the curriculum. In addition, an analysis of the descriptive data, across and within the cases was done to identify factors that shape the way teachers use the curriculum. The analysis revealed that teachers use the curriculum in distinctive ways and included multiple layers of offloading, adapting, improvising and omitting. The way teachers use the curriculum varies from one teacher to another, from one lesson to another, and from one activity to another. Curriculum tool features, individual characteristics as well as the island context played significant roles in shaping how teachers use the curriculum in their teaching. The results of the study can provide curriculum developers with a different perspective in designing curriculum tools, particularly to create flexible affordances within the curriculum to allow for differing teacher and locational characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尔代夫ESL教师与教师工具关系的多元个案研究
马尔代夫于2015年实施了一项重大课程改革。人们对新课程是如何在课堂教学中使用和实施的知之甚少。本研究以六位六年级英语教师为研究对象,采用质的多元个案研究方法,考察教师与工具的关系,以及影响教师与工具关系的因素。教师们分布在四所不同背景的学校——人口稠密的城市背景、人口稀少的多年级教室岛屿、依赖渔业的岛屿和依赖旅游业的岛屿。收集的数据包括对每位教师的三次视频观察,以及观察后和观察前的访谈。布朗的颁布能力设计框架(DCEF)被用作判断教师是否卸载、调整或即兴制定课程的基础。此外,还对案例中的描述性数据进行了分析,以确定影响教师使用课程方式的因素。分析显示,教师以独特的方式使用课程,包括多层卸载、改编、即兴创作和省略。教师使用课程的方式因教师而异,因课程而异,因活动而异。课程工具特征、个人特征以及岛屿背景在塑造教师在教学中如何使用课程方面发挥了重要作用。研究结果可以为课程开发人员在设计课程工具时提供不同的视角,特别是在课程中创造灵活的可供性,以适应不同的教师和地点特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International and Comparative Education
Journal of International and Comparative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Designing World Language Curriculum for Intercultural Communicative Competence Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications Private Tuition in Cambodia: Evidence from Urban and Rural Upper Secondary Schools Test Anxiety: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Test Anxiety Among form Four School Students in Malaysia Key Issues and “Push/Pull” Messaging on South East Asian Education Agency Websites Book Review: Shadow Education in the Middle East: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1